Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[p4p-champ]

Pacquiao:" In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather"

[ADP02]

DUDE, THEY ****ING TOLD YOU SPECIFICALLY THAT A RETROACTIVE TUE IS ALLOWED. WADA TOLD YOU ALSO. WHY ARE YOU SO ****ING DENSE???? DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE WORD RETROACTIVE MEANS? THERE IS NO WAY YOU ARE THIS ******!




HE WAS DRUG TESTED AFTER THE IV, MAN. IF THERE WAS SOMETHING IN HIS SYSTEM, THEY WOULD FIND IT. DID IT MAGICALLY DISAPPEAR IN 2 MINUTES???? PLEASE STOP WITH YOUR ******ED BULLSHlT!




HE APPLIED FOR A TUE. WHAT PART OF THIS ARE YOU NOT UNDERSTANDING?



LMAOOO. THANKS, SHERLOCK.



THERE IS NO REASON FOR ME TO EVER DUCK ANYTHING YOU SAY. You don't make any sense at all. Show me where WADA/USADA said that in all circumstances, an IV will not be allowed for mild to moderate dehydration. Tell me where it says it will only be allowed for emergencies. If you can't find it.....you take another L.



You still don't understand the difference, do you? There is a big difference between being present and monitoring all activity and NOT ****ING BEING THERE AT ALL AND BEING TOLD AT A LATER TIME.



What the actual **** is wrong with you? Did you really just make up imaginary dialogues to fit your agenda? Saying that you know what service he called for the IV? Dude, you are really going off the deep end now.




Dude, you have no idea what you are talking about. You don't know when he gave the 1st partial sample, and you failed in your SG bullshlt. I'm sure you know that by now with how easily your "over 2 hour" theory was destroyed. You failed miserably, so don't ever bring up Diaz again, or the SG test.



You still comparing this to Lance? I already told you that an IV is used for blood tests. For a urine test, it can only dilute. Mayweather's samples were not diluted, and your bs about SG didn't fly. Game over.




Enter the ABP. You know what that is, right? DUDE, GAME OVERRRRR! JUST STOP!




WHOOOOAAAA.. A VITAMIN LACED IV. I'M SURE THAT MADE HIM WIN DAMN NEAR EVERY ROUND.



DID HE EVEN HAVE HYPONATREMIA? HOW SERIOUS WAS IT? DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIS MEDICAL CONDITION? GIVE THE **** UP.





LMAOOOOO. ADP02 CAN BEAT THE TUEC DOCTORS! LMAOOOOO. DUDE. YOU ARE BEYOND DELUSIONAL. I DON'T EVEN WANT TO TALK TO YOU ANYMORE. SERIOUSLY... YOU'RE SO DELUSIONAL THAT YOU ARE MORONIC!



FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS NO EVIDENCE AT ALL, YOU SURE DO ASK FOR A LOT. LOOK, USADA AND WADA HAVE CONFIRMED THAT AN IV CAN BE USED FOR REHYDRATION. ISN'T THAT RIGHT?

THE TUEC APPROVED IT. ISN'T THAT RIGHT.

ALL INFORMATION WAS UPLOADED TO WADA, ISN'T THAT RIGHT?


STOP ****ING SPECULATING THAT THIS PERSON DIDN'T DO THEIR JOB CORRECTLY, THIS PERSON WAS BOUGHT OFF, THIS TEST IS INVALID....SHUT THE **** UP.

YOUR DELUSIONAL BULLSHlT IS OLD NOW. YOUR CONSPIRACY THEORY DOESN'T HOLD UP. LOOK HOW MUCH YOU NEED:

1. Some en****** were paid off
2. Some en****** are inept at their job
3. some drug testing techniques are not up to ADP02 standards.

YOU ARE SO ****ING SAD. BUZZ THE **** OFF!

So much BS and deflections from your side, its not even funny anymore.

Come back with concrete information not what you keep on doing.


Why did they investigate other athletes but not Floyd's case in which I even presented to you an article from Australian NADO that says beware that its fishy if the athlete requests an IV just before giving a sample.


Summary of YOUR TYPE OF RESPONSES:
Well you can because they say you can so its all good.

So TRAVESTYNY is right and the NADO who brings up a valid point is not ..... they are delusional according to TRAV


I keep on telling you, there is a mountain of evidence for Floyd. We have information before and after the IV on Floyd. There is so much information that there is just about nothing left that could change it. WHY? Floyd told us why he had the IV. You cannot start with that because as I pointed out, its a no-starter because the excuses are BS LIES!!! So you are stuck.

Secondly, WADA brings up this but because you have no comeback, you deflect to a word that I said which you naturally took out of context .... I didn't say emergency. I said emergency type situation. Just ask yourself this. If it was not so severe, then why the heck would you advise to give Floyd an IV which is a banned method and you don not even have a TUE for?

Did Floyd call up USADA to make sure that there would be no problems? "USADA, can you do me a favor,....."

Whatever it is, it was a huge risk if it was anyone but Floyd.

" It must be understood that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific evidence
to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than IV infusion."


Just like with Nick Diaz, with what we both know, should Floyd have been given the RETRO TUE when requested 3 weeks after the fact?

The answer is no but you are too coward to answer my questions from my previous posts so you deflect.

Of course, even with Diaz you had nothing so I do see a trend.



You need to go back to the basics and learn. SG tests can be beat. They have their limitations. You can dilute many FOLDs. Lots to bring up but this is not the first time. GO LEARN!!!

[travestyny]

so much bs and deflections from your side, its not even funny anymore.

Come back with concrete information not what you keep on doing.


Why did they investigate other athletes but not floyd's case in which i even presented to you an article from australian nado that says beware that its fishy if the athlete requests an iv just before giving a sample.


summary of your type of responses:
well you can because they say you can so its all good.

So travestyny is right and the nado who brings up a valid point is not ..... They are delusional according to trav


I keep on telling you, there is a mountain of evidence for floyd. We have information before and after the iv on floyd. There is so much information that there is just about nothing left that could change it. Why? Floyd told us why he had the iv. you cannot start with that because as i pointed out, its a no-starter because the excuses are bs lies!!! So you are stuck.

secondly, wada brings up this but because you have no comeback, you deflect to a word that i said which you naturally took out of context .... I didn't say emergency. I said emergency type situation. Just ask yourself this. If it was not so severe, then why the heck would you advise to give floyd an iv which is a banned method and you don not even have a tue for?

Did floyd call up usada to make sure that there would be no problems? "usada, can you do me a favor,....."

whatever it is, it was a huge risk if it was anyone but floyd.

" it must be understood that the use of iv fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild to moderate dehydration is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. there is a well-established body of scientific evidence
to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, potentially even more effective than iv infusion."


just like with nick diaz, with what we both know, should floyd have been given the retro tue when requested 3 weeks after the fact?

The answer is no but you are too coward to answer my questions from my previous posts so you deflect.

of course, even with diaz you had nothing so i do see a trend.



you need to go back to the basics and learn. Sg tests can be beat. They have their limitations. You can dilute many folds. Lots to bring up but this is not the first time. Go learn!!!

lmaooo. Dude. Over and over, all these parties that you are mentioning have told you that you are wrong!!! You want to know about tue's? Talk to wada and usada. They told you that you are wrong. Everyone has told you that you are wrong!

1. Wada
2. Usada
3. Nsac
4. Mro's
4. Anti-doping experts.


You are a ****ing loser. Keep crying. It's really sad how delusional you are. Your ****ing lord and savior losttttttt! Deal with it like a ****ing man, chump! Stop blaming everyone for his ****ing loss.

You've blamed:
1. The judges
2. The ref
3. Usada
4. Nsac
5. The labs

do you notice a ****ing trend? Jesus christ. I'm done with you. No matter how much i've destroyed your dumb ass posts, you can't ****ign learn because you can't get over that your lord and savior wasn't good enough!

[travestyny]

I keep on telling you, there is a mountain of evidence for Floyd.

Yet Pacquiao couldn't appeal his loss. He needed ADP02 on his legal team. LMAO. You have some serious delusions of grandeur. Too bad everyone here is 10X smarter than you. Actually, it's not that you're completely an idiot. It's just that you're so blinded by hate that you come across as a complete idiot.

I suggest you take your mountain of evidence to Manny Pacquiao. Let's see if he believes you have something. Maybe then he will stop begging at his conqueror's feet for a rematch!

Nick Diaz:
1. A 20 year vet MRO says you are wrong
2. An anti-doping expert says you are wrong.

ADP02: No, no experts agree with me, but I know more than the experts.

Floyd Mayweather:
a. USADA says you are wrong
b. WADA says you are wrong
c. NSAC says you are wrong
d. Independent labs say you are wrong
e. Independent the****utic use exemption committee says you are wrong

ADP02: They were bought off, biased, or incompetent. I know more than all of them about their own protocol even.

This is all anyone needs to see to expose you. No one with a brain believes you, moron! Keep crying.

[ADP02]

lmaooo. Dude. Over and over, all these parties that you are mentioning have told you that you are wrong!!! You want to know about tue's? Talk to wada and usada. They told you that you are wrong. Everyone has told you that you are wrong!

1. Wada
2. Usada
3. Nsac
4. Mro's
4. Anti-doping experts.


You are a ****ing loser. Keep crying. It's really sad how delusional you are. Your ****ing lord and savior losttttttt! Deal with it like a ****ing man, chump! Stop blaming everyone for his ****ing loss.

You've blamed:
1. The judges
2. The ref
3. Usada
4. Nsac
5. The labs

do you notice a ****ing trend? Jesus christ. I'm done with you. No matter how much i've destroyed your dumb ass posts, you can't ****ign learn because you can't get over that your lord and savior wasn't good enough!

More deflections. You cannot be honest about this. I asked you in simple terms but you still deflect the questions.


Experts did NOT agree with you. Even Diaz's expert said that there is a possibility that 2 results from different abs and protocols can have dramatically different results. Yet you believe that you are right. Talk about delusional!

NSAC: Were you in agreement with them as far as Diaz was concerned? So the truth is, you believe in them only if it helps your case. If it doesn't you are ready to throw them under the bus!

LABS: Did you accept the QUEST and SMRTL results or just the one that fits your case? So the truth is, you believe in them only if it helps your case. If it doesn't you are ready to throw them under the bus!



I provided you with lots of questions and examples. You on the other hand prefer to just deflect and go on a tangent. Reason is simple. You are stuck. You cannot respond so you respond the way you do.

Are the questions just too hard for you?



.

[ADP02]

Yet Pacquiao couldn't appeal his loss. He needed ADP02 on his legal team. LMAO. You have some serious delusions of grandeur. Too bad everyone here is 10X smarter than you. Actually, it's not that you're completely an idiot. It's just that you're so blinded by hate that you come across as a complete idiot.

I suggest you take your mountain of evidence to Manny Pacquiao. Let's see if he believes you have something. Maybe then he will stop begging at his conqueror's feet for a rematch!

Nick Diaz:
1. A 20 year vet MRO says you are wrong
2. An anti-doping expert says you are wrong.

ADP02: No, no experts agree with me, but I know more than the experts.

Floyd Mayweather:
a. USADA says you are wrong
b. WADA says you are wrong
c. NSAC says you are wrong
d. Independent labs say you are wrong
e. Independent the****utic use exemption committee says you are wrong

ADP02: They were bought off, biased, or incompetent. I know more than all of them about their own protocol even.

This is all anyone needs to see to expose you. No one with a brain believes you, moron! Keep crying.

Oh man, more of the same nonsense. Read my previous post. You do the same when they do not jive with your agenda.



2 can play your dumb game:

NSAC stopped the investigation with Manny. Did you just accept NSAC or did you start up a thread and show how Manny was waving a flag on a still picture? Which I showed you that you were WRONG with that picture as it was taken BEFORE the fight not after. Lots of Floyd fans drank your Koolaid but they didn't know the truth.

Then you went on and on about a LEGAL substance and how it would put Manny at an advantage even though we both know that it wouldn't against a defensive fighter that doesn't throw like Mike Tyson and not even frequently. That was on a legal substance. Imagine it wasn't, like Floyd?

NSAC said you were WRONG about DIAZ......



.

[travestyny]

even diaz's expert said that there is a possibility that 2 results from different abs and protocols can have dramatically different results. Yet you believe that you are right. Talk about delusional!

how many times do i have to tell you this, you ****ing moron. Diaz experts said that quest got it wrong. It doesn't matter if 2 labs got different results. That's their point. One got it wrong, idiot! The mro told you that in plain english!

nsac: Were you in agreement with them as far as diaz was concerned? So the truth is, you believe in them only if it helps your case. If it doesn't you are ready to throw them under the bus!

labs: Did you accept the quest and smrtl results or just the one that fits your case? So the truth is, you believe in them only if it helps your case. If it doesn't you are ready to throw them under the bus!

are you slow. Two experts said quest got it wrong. Keep trying

i provided you with lots of questions and examples. You on the other hand prefer to just deflect and go on a tangent. Reason is simple. You are stuck. You cannot respond so you respond the way you do.

Are the questions just too hard for you?
.

you provided me with nothing. What you did was said nothing when i asked why not experts agree with you.

Once again. Where are your experts that agree with you. Bring 'em out.


I didn't think so, clown.

[travestyny]

oh man, more of the same nonsense. Read my previous post. You do the same when they do not jive with your agenda.



2 can play your dumb game:

nsac stopped the investigation with manny. Did you just accept nsac or did you start up a thread and show how manny was waving a flag on a still picture? Which i showed you that you were wrong with that picture as it was taken before the fight not after. Lots of floyd fans drank your koolaid but they didn't know the truth.

Nsac said you were wrong about diaz......

1. You said mayweather was abusing clenbuterol.

AND YOU'VE BEEN WRONG ABOUT A MILLION OTHER THINGS TOO, CLOWN BOY!

What happened mr. Expert ant-doping guy? Shows you know nothing of what you are talking about.

meanwhile: I proved my case about pac and won the poll. You cried that...surprise surprise...the poll was biased. Lmaoooooooo! Just like you always do when you lose. Something or someone is biased. Lmaoooooooo! Clown!

2. You admit being proven wrong about 2 hours to dope.

then 2 experts prove you wrong...and you.....


Crickets chirping. Lmaoooooo

give the **** up.

still waiting for your experts that believe you. Showed you mine. Waitinggggggggggg!!!!! Where yours at, doe?

[travestyny]

nsac said you were wrong about diaz......
.

try harder. Nsac has no anti-doping experts.

Nsac also quickly reversed course when they knew they were gonna get destroyed in court.


that's the best you got? Lmaoooooooo! If you had some guts, that thunderdome thread is still sitting there. You gonna accept that challenge? Your experts against mine. I'll gladly post what my experts have to say against what nsac said. Let's see how quickly you get laughed off this forum, chump

[ADP02]

how many times do i have to tell you this, you ****ing moron. Diaz experts said that quest got it wrong. It doesn't matter if 2 labs got different results. That's their point. One got it wrong, idiot! The mro told you that in plain english!

Your expert never seen QUEST make a mistake as far as incorrectly call out a positive result.

Your expert said that there can be dramatically different results.

Which of the above 2 statements are wrong? I say none and I see you deflecting what I said!

are you slow. Two experts said quest got it wrong. Keep trying

TALK ABOUT SLOW:
a) Your 2 experts are biased and in favor of Diaz. One was Diaz's witness and the other helped Diaz by providing him with lawyers and both used unreliable values. Lets see you deflect the word UNRELIABLE VALUES ....... AGAIN!!!!

b) As I stated above but you like to deflect, Your expert said that there can be dramatically different results.

you provided me with nothing. What you did was said nothing when i asked why not experts agree with you.

Once again. Where are your experts that agree with you. Bring 'em out.


I didn't think so, clown

.


Drrr, ALL 3 experts said that there can be dramatically different results. That is all you really need to know and get. Can you understand that? I doubt it! You will deflect ...... AGAIN!!!


and lets not forget that you cannot get what 8 FOLDS or 10 FOLDS mean. So again, go learn all that and then come back and say THAY YOU WERE WRONG!!!


You couldn't even agree to something as simple as this:
SG and CR have their limitations. I showed you proof that SG can be above the limit yet the sample was still diluted as far as the PEDs in question. Go learn or at least admit that you were WRONG but didn't have the guts to admit it. I would accept that and shake your hand ......................

.