Whos career suffers more with a loss, Garcia or Thurmans?
Collapse
-
Thurman's obviously
He's a much more respectable champ right now, especially compared to someone whos been established as a cherry picker
If Garcia loses all everyones gonna say is some **** like SEE I TOLD YOU HE WAS A PAPER CHAMP NO WONDER HE WAS AVOIDING REAL COMPETITION THIS WHOLE TIME
If Thurman loses though everybody basically gonna say he got exposed and lost to a cherry picker who doesnt even look when he throws the left hookLast edited by HtotheZ; 01-19-2017, 05:36 PM.Comment
-
Garcia probably, because I think if he wins He could get the Floyd payday.
I don't think if Thurman wins Floyd Would give him the fight, so Thurman doesn't really gain or lose much, unless a fight with PAC is possible which also doesn't seem like the case.Comment
-
Yeah i think Thurman will be force fed Spence.Comment
-
But why does a career have to suffer with a loss? That's the problem with all you casuals - ya'll think this is a zero-sum game.
The fighters fight on - so what if they lose? They come back and win the next one.Comment
-
If you are an idiot and think a loss makes a career suffer, then Thurman. Garcie is moving up and he the naturally smaller guy. IMO, whoever loses is still a great fighter in my book. It will take a great one to beat either of them so yeahComment
-
I don't know if force fed Would be the way I'd put it but its possible I guess.
I'd expect Haymon to continue taking spence along extremely slow. Just look at how he brought up his other prospects who didn't have anywhere near his upside as far as talent and possible star power.
Look how babied wilder is, he was an Olympian 9 years ago, still hasn't done ****.Comment
-
Comment
Comment