Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whos career suffers more with a loss, Garcia or Thurmans?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by SkillspayBills View Post
    It all depends on how they respond to a loss. The loser can come back and become champion once again since they are both that good.
    This right here. Not only that it would show that the winner beat a quality opponent

    Comment


    • #22
      Thurman's obviously

      He's a much more respectable champ right now, especially compared to someone whos been established as a cherry picker

      If Garcia loses all everyones gonna say is some **** like SEE I TOLD YOU HE WAS A PAPER CHAMP NO WONDER HE WAS AVOIDING REAL COMPETITION THIS WHOLE TIME

      If Thurman loses though everybody basically gonna say he got exposed and lost to a cherry picker who doesnt even look when he throws the left hook
      Last edited by HtotheZ; 01-19-2017, 05:36 PM.

      Comment


      • #23
        Neither fighter loses anything but the fight. Fans need to grow up and realize that when top tier men fight each other someone has a loss. Big deal you move on to your next fight!
        Ray

        Comment


        • #24
          Garcia probably, because I think if he wins He could get the Floyd payday.

          I don't think if Thurman wins Floyd Would give him the fight, so Thurman doesn't really gain or lose much, unless a fight with PAC is possible which also doesn't seem like the case.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by AddiX View Post
            Garcia probably, because I think if he wins He could get the Floyd payday.

            I don't think if Thurman wins Floyd Would give him the fight, so Thurman doesn't really gain or lose much, unless a fight with PAC is possible which also doesn't seem like the case.
            Yeah i think Thurman will be force fed Spence.

            Comment


            • #26
              But why does a career have to suffer with a loss? That's the problem with all you casuals - ya'll think this is a zero-sum game.

              The fighters fight on - so what if they lose? They come back and win the next one.

              Comment


              • #27
                If you are an idiot and think a loss makes a career suffer, then Thurman. Garcie is moving up and he the naturally smaller guy. IMO, whoever loses is still a great fighter in my book. It will take a great one to beat either of them so yeah

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Boxfan83 View Post
                  Yeah i think Thurman will be force fed Spence.
                  I don't know if force fed Would be the way I'd put it but its possible I guess.

                  I'd expect Haymon to continue taking spence along extremely slow. Just look at how he brought up his other prospects who didn't have anywhere near his upside as far as talent and possible star power.

                  Look how babied wilder is, he was an Olympian 9 years ago, still hasn't done ****.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Ray Corso View Post
                    Neither fighter loses anything but the fight. Fans need to grow up and realize that when top tier men fight each other someone has a loss. Big deal you move on to your next fight!
                    Ray
                    ^^^^^ true^^^^^

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      NEITHER if it is a Great Fight! Some rivals in boxing wouldn't hurt, if they end up fighting 2-3 times that is great for the sport!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP