Danny Jacobs still not enrolled to Vada?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Donnie Herrera
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2016
    • 2373
    • 287
    • 254
    • 40,297

    #51
    Originally posted by Freedom.
    Who's alt is this?

    If Povetkin really were on PEDs and ONLY Wilder was tested, then of course it would be unfair.

    Different situation entirely. Both were tested, both challenger and titleholder.

    So similarly, both Jacobs and Golovkin should be tested.
    that's not what i'm highlighting esse, and that is not the point holmes

    the point is you blasted wilder for canceling a fight with a cheat and wanted him to conitnue with the fight anyway

    so in kind i'm telling you let the fight continue on ggg's a real "warrior" right? oh and pedvetkin is really on peds, their's no excuse for ostarine to show up in his system, let alone from "tainted meat"

    Consequences!

    Comment

    • The Hammer
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 50797
      • 3,416
      • 8,704
      • 58,851

      #52
      Originally posted by Donnie Herrera
      that's not what i'm highlighting esse, and that is not the point holmes

      the point is you blasted wilder for canceling a fight with a cheat and wanted him to conitnue with the fight anyway

      so in kind i'm telling you let the fight continue on ggg's a real "warrior" right? oh and pedvetkin is really on peds, their's no excuse for ostarine to show up in his system, let alone from "tainted meat"
      Who's alt is this?

      Povetkin's result was a microscopic trace, later deemed by the WBC to be too tiny to be a positive result.

      I imagine if someone were REALLY roiding, they'd not agree to do VADA testing, right? Because of the consequences?

      Because Golovkin is being tested, Jacobs should be tested.

      Comment

      • casheddie
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2015
        • 667
        • 22
        • 16
        • 7,366

        #53
        Danny Jacobs needs all the help he can get. Vada and GGG probably spared him the testing.

        Comment

        • Donnie Herrera
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2016
          • 2373
          • 287
          • 254
          • 40,297

          #54
          Originally posted by Freedom.
          Who's alt is this?

          Povetkin's result was a microscopic trace, later deemed by the WBC to be too tiny to be a positive result.

          I imagine if someone were REALLY roiding, they'd not agree to do VADA testing, right? Because of the consequences?

          Because Golovkin is being tested, Jacobs should be tested.
          known as microdosing even Gabe Montoya and Dan Rafael called pedvetkin out on it

          Gabriel Montoya™ ‏@Gabriel_Montoya 2h2 hours ago
          The problem with Povetkin's alleged story is that I'm also told Povetkin's 3 prior samples came back negative. #boxing #microdosing


          so you were saying?

          Consequences!

          Comment

          • _Maxi
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2015
            • 8978
            • 509
            • 718
            • 91,740

            #55
            Originally posted by Donnie Herrera
            known as microdosing even Gabe Montoya and Dan Rafael called pedvetkin out on it

            Gabriel Montoya™ ‏@Gabriel_Montoya 2h2 hours ago
            The problem with Povetkin's alleged story is that I'm also told Povetkin's 3 prior samples came back negative. #boxing #microdosing


            so you were saying?

            Consequences!
            Liposoluble drugs are stored in fat. They get into the blood once the fat is burnt in training. This explains why some prior tests can be negative before. Besides that, he was cleaned by WADA because the amount was too small and it was consistent with use before the substance was banned.

            Then you have the second time he failed, for ostarine. I won't defend him for that. I'm giving him the benefit of doubt in the first case but clearly he took something the second time, whether he knew he was taking ir or it was contained on a supplement, but he took it.

            Both situations are very different.

            Comment

            • Donnie Herrera
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2016
              • 2373
              • 287
              • 254
              • 40,297

              #56
              Originally posted by _Maxi
              Liposoluble drugs are stored in fat. They get into the blood once the fat is burnt in training. This explains why some prior tests can be negative before. Besides that, he was cleaned by WADA because the amount was too small and it was consistent with use before the substance was banned.

              Then you have the second time he failed, for ostarine. I won't defend him for that. I'm giving him the benefit of doubt in the first case but clearly he took something the second time, whether he knew he was taking ir or it was contained on a supplement, but he took it.

              Both situations are very different.

              Blah, 3 straight tests negative, 4th test positive = cheat

              get's slap on the wrist

              with stiverne he tested pos a 2nd time for ostarine, excuse was "tainted meat" if you're in the know...you know that that is not plausible!

              Consequences!

              Comment

              • DoktorSleepless
                DoktorWakeless
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 11473
                • 440
                • 186
                • 27,349

                #57
                Originally posted by Freedom.
                One is being tested, the other is not.

                Is that fair? Do you want one fighter to have an unfair advantage over the other?

                If you had any sense of sportsmanship or honor, you'd agree they BOTH should be tested so it will be a FAIR FIGHT.
                What's your opinion of Pascal being tested in the first Kovalev-Pascal fight while Kovalev chose not to be tested? Was that fair? Did Kovalev have honor?

                Comment

                • The Hammer
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 50797
                  • 3,416
                  • 8,704
                  • 58,851

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Donnie Herrera
                  known as microdosing even Gabe Montoya and Dan Rafael called pedvetkin out on it

                  Gabriel Montoya™ ‏@Gabriel_Montoya 2h2 hours ago
                  The problem with Povetkin's alleged story is that I'm also told Povetkin's 3 prior samples came back negative. #boxing #microdosing


                  so you were saying?
                  Montoya is a jackass who is as prejudiced against Russians as you are. I don't believe anything he tweets.

                  Who's alt are you?

                  Comment

                  • _Maxi
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 8978
                    • 509
                    • 718
                    • 91,740

                    #59
                    Originally posted by DoktorSleepless
                    What's your opinion of Pascal being tested in the first Kovalev-Pascal fight while Kovalev chose not to be tested? Was that fair? Did Kovalev have honor?
                    Do you have any proof of that? I'm asking seriously. No BS please, this forum is full of BS already.

                    What I'm reading is that there wasn't an agreement and VADA was not used for either fighter in the first fight.

                    Comment

                    • satiev1
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 4658
                      • 573
                      • 0
                      • 78,492

                      #60
                      Originally posted by _Maxi
                      Do you have any proof of that? I'm asking seriously. No BS please, this forum is full of BS already.

                      What I'm reading is that there wasn't an agreement and VADA was not used for either fighter in the first fight.
                      BS. Pascal refused vada testing and therefore kovalev said vada or nothing. Pascal wanted to use some agency based in canada lol. Once again more disinfo on nsb. LOL.

                      On Tuesday, former champion Jean Pascal (29-2-1, 17KOs) lashed out over his inability to finalize a random drug testing protocol for his upcoming fight with WBO/IBF/WBA light heavyweight king Sergey Kovalev (26-0-1, 23KOs). The HBO televised fight take place on March 14th at the Bell Centre in Montreal, Canada. According to Pascal, his demand for random testing was rejected due to the high cost. A counter-demand was sent to him, where he was asked to pay for the entire drug testing protocol. Pascal agreed, and assumed the two sides were going move forward with the testing, but the boxer claims the testing terms were then modified by Main Events - which Pascal rejected.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP