Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Danny Jacobs still not enrolled to Vada?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Freedom. View Post
    Who's alt is this?

    If Povetkin really were on PEDs and ONLY Wilder was tested, then of course it would be unfair.

    Different situation entirely. Both were tested, both challenger and titleholder.

    So similarly, both Jacobs and Golovkin should be tested.
    that's not what i'm highlighting esse, and that is not the point holmes

    the point is you blasted wilder for canceling a fight with a cheat and wanted him to conitnue with the fight anyway

    so in kind i'm telling you let the fight continue on ggg's a real "warrior" right? oh and pedvetkin is really on peds, their's no excuse for ostarine to show up in his system, let alone from "tainted meat"

    Consequences!

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Donnie Herrera View Post
      that's not what i'm highlighting esse, and that is not the point holmes

      the point is you blasted wilder for canceling a fight with a cheat and wanted him to conitnue with the fight anyway

      so in kind i'm telling you let the fight continue on ggg's a real "warrior" right? oh and pedvetkin is really on peds, their's no excuse for ostarine to show up in his system, let alone from "tainted meat"
      Who's alt is this?

      Povetkin's result was a microscopic trace, later deemed by the WBC to be too tiny to be a positive result.

      I imagine if someone were REALLY roiding, they'd not agree to do VADA testing, right? Because of the consequences?

      Because Golovkin is being tested, Jacobs should be tested.

      Comment


      • #53
        Danny Jacobs needs all the help he can get. Vada and GGG probably spared him the testing.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Freedom. View Post
          Who's alt is this?

          Povetkin's result was a microscopic trace, later deemed by the WBC to be too tiny to be a positive result.

          I imagine if someone were REALLY roiding, they'd not agree to do VADA testing, right? Because of the consequences?

          Because Golovkin is being tested, Jacobs should be tested.
          known as microdosing even Gabe Montoya and Dan Rafael called pedvetkin out on it

          Gabriel Montoya™ ‏@Gabriel_Montoya 2h2 hours ago
          The problem with Povetkin's alleged story is that I'm also told Povetkin's 3 prior samples came back negative. #boxing #microdosing


          so you were saying?

          Consequences!

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Donnie Herrera View Post
            known as microdosing even Gabe Montoya and Dan Rafael called pedvetkin out on it

            Gabriel Montoya™ ‏@Gabriel_Montoya 2h2 hours ago
            The problem with Povetkin's alleged story is that I'm also told Povetkin's 3 prior samples came back negative. #boxing #microdosing


            so you were saying?

            Consequences!
            Liposoluble drugs are stored in fat. They get into the blood once the fat is burnt in training. This explains why some prior tests can be negative before. Besides that, he was cleaned by WADA because the amount was too small and it was consistent with use before the substance was banned.

            Then you have the second time he failed, for ostarine. I won't defend him for that. I'm giving him the benefit of doubt in the first case but clearly he took something the second time, whether he knew he was taking ir or it was contained on a supplement, but he took it.

            Both situations are very different.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
              Liposoluble drugs are stored in fat. They get into the blood once the fat is burnt in training. This explains why some prior tests can be negative before. Besides that, he was cleaned by WADA because the amount was too small and it was consistent with use before the substance was banned.

              Then you have the second time he failed, for ostarine. I won't defend him for that. I'm giving him the benefit of doubt in the first case but clearly he took something the second time, whether he knew he was taking ir or it was contained on a supplement, but he took it.

              Both situations are very different.

              Blah, 3 straight tests negative, 4th test positive = cheat

              get's slap on the wrist

              with stiverne he tested pos a 2nd time for ostarine, excuse was "tainted meat" if you're in the know...you know that that is not plausible!

              Consequences!

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Freedom. View Post
                One is being tested, the other is not.

                Is that fair? Do you want one fighter to have an unfair advantage over the other?

                If you had any sense of sportsmanship or honor, you'd agree they BOTH should be tested so it will be a FAIR FIGHT.
                What's your opinion of Pascal being tested in the first Kovalev-Pascal fight while Kovalev chose not to be tested? Was that fair? Did Kovalev have honor?

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Donnie Herrera View Post
                  known as microdosing even Gabe Montoya and Dan Rafael called pedvetkin out on it

                  Gabriel Montoya™ ‏@Gabriel_Montoya 2h2 hours ago
                  The problem with Povetkin's alleged story is that I'm also told Povetkin's 3 prior samples came back negative. #boxing #microdosing


                  so you were saying?
                  Montoya is a jackass who is as prejudiced against Russians as you are. I don't believe anything he tweets.

                  Who's alt are you?

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View Post
                    What's your opinion of Pascal being tested in the first Kovalev-Pascal fight while Kovalev chose not to be tested? Was that fair? Did Kovalev have honor?
                    Do you have any proof of that? I'm asking seriously. No BS please, this forum is full of BS already.

                    What I'm reading is that there wasn't an agreement and VADA was not used for either fighter in the first fight.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                      Do you have any proof of that? I'm asking seriously. No BS please, this forum is full of BS already.

                      What I'm reading is that there wasn't an agreement and VADA was not used for either fighter in the first fight.
                      BS. Pascal refused vada testing and therefore kovalev said vada or nothing. Pascal wanted to use some agency based in canada lol. Once again more disinfo on nsb. LOL.

                      http://www.boxingscene.com/kovalev-r...-attack--86584

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP