Originally posted by Dr Rumack
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Danny Jacobs still not enrolled to Vada?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by KillaCamNZ View PostIt's not a stretch to say that most fighters are on something. Why the hell wouldn't they be? Testing is so lax, the could piss gasoline and no one would know.
When there's this much money and fame on the line, you've gotta get that extra 5% from somewhere.
I completely understand that fighters body shapes and composition change over time, and can be improved upon. But Jacobs transformation is incredible - it's not like he was giving half-effort in the gym beforehand..now he's a specimen.
It's not really a question of who is juiced up - it's a question of who is juicing up most effectively.
Have to give credit to the WBC and Mauricio Sulaiman in particular for getting behind this. His old man would never have done it.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by larry x.. View PostHe doesnt have to enroll...he is not ranked by the WBC
but ive never really looked that deep into it so.............
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostIt doesnt matter if hes ranked. He's fighting for the WBC title so my understanding is that in order for the WBC to sanction it each fighter must comply.
but ive never really looked that deep into it so.............
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Rumack View PostYear round testing would help. It doesn't stop doping completely, but it makes it a lot more difficult and expensive.
Have to give credit to the WBC and Mauricio Sulaiman in particular for getting behind this. His old man would never have done it.
It's fair to be critical of the WBC and Sulaiman for a number of reasons, but they definitely deserve a tip of the cap for leading the charge against doping in boxing.
It instantly reminds me of a radio interview I heard last night, I think it was the head of the WTA - one of the tennis organizations. He was questioned about what tennis is doing to clean up the sport, and it was pointed out to him that at the latest Shangai Masters tournament - effectively the biggest non-major tournament, zero testing was done on the athletes. His response? "It's beneficial to be infrequent with testing, to discourage the systematic cheating". This shows me that even though it's 2017, basic principles of testing aren't even common.
Comment
-
-
Comment