Originally posted by risk10
Best Welterweight Ever?
Collapse
-
sorry man...didn`t see your first post.Originally posted by BrooklynBomberU musta be real dumb not to understand sarcasm, and u might have not read my previous posts claiming that Robinson would beat any welter in history.Comment
-
LOL can you think and read straight? I answered this postOriginally posted by Rosewood_htownLike you said, he beat DLH and TOOK HIS belt...so that paper belt **** should have never come up...every boxer started out with no belt playa...come on...paper belt...he took your boy belt and thats that..next!!
tito was lineal champ only when he beat De La Hoya, therefore he held a paper belt longer than anyone else.Originally posted by Rane-Ex54And before that, Tito was KO'ing tons of good fighters in there prime & maintaining his belt for a long time, isn't that "rising to the occasion"? Tito held the belt longer then all those guys.
He was not the lineal champ longer than any champ, because, after robbing De La Hoya, he immediately vacated his belt.
do you get it?
You are ridicolously insinuating that De La Hoya is my boy, while you hugging tito's nuts for 25 pages of thread, without being able of convincing anyone of what you are saying.
by the way, you are still avoiding to answer any post by me or anyone else where it is politely and in detailed fashion explained to you why leonard or hearns would hand your boy his assComment
-
I can only guess its another "welterweight" great Jake LaMottaOriginally posted by wmutewho is Jake L.?
Ok, roflcopter just came to evacuate me from this thread.Comment
-
ok...paper belt...I call a belt a belt...and when you capture the top belt then no one should ever mention the word paper belt and your name in the same sentence ever again..get it now playa??...tito didnt run away from anything. there was nolonger a treat in that division..he went on to bigger and better fighter just like most boxers do...including dlh....dlh was offered a rematch but it was he who declined...as a matter of fact all..were offered a rematch and none excepted....i think it was do to fear...the fear of the big bad tito...read....lol.....what more is it you need me to explain to you..like you say i have been explaining for 25 pages..lol....bottom line i say tito is the best WW ever....how they hell you get offended because i stick to my boxer....lol....you funny playaOriginally posted by wmuteLOL can you think and read straight? I answered this post
tito was lineal champ only when he beat De La Hoya, therefore he held a paper belt longer than anyone else.
He was not the lineal champ longer than any champ, because, after robbing De La Hoya, he immediately vacated his belt.
do you get it?
You are ridicolously insinuating that De La Hoya is my boy, while you hugging tito's nuts for 25 pages of thread, without being able of convincing anyone of what you are saying.
by the way, you are still avoiding to answer any post by me or anyone else where it is politely and in detailed fashion explained to you why leonard or hearns would hand your boy his assComment
-
fantasy fight for you my manOriginally posted by BrooklynBomberI can only guess its another "welterweight" great Jake LaMotta
Ok, roflcopter just came to evacuate me from this thread.
hagler vs la motta at junior welter
how do you see this playing out?Comment
-
Undernourishment ko LaMotta and Hagler.Originally posted by wmutefantasy fight for you my man
hagler vs la motta at junior welter
how do you see this playing out?
Comment
Comment