Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

floyd mayweather jr- what more could he have done?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by larry x.. View Post
    I dont get how people slam floyd and have favorite current fighters..no one is taking the challenges he did, fighters are not taking risks and yet you slam Floyd?? What fighter is even close to being lineal in 4 different divisions?? what fighters are fighting p4p fighters on a regular basis?? what fighters are even fighting other champions fight after fight?
    im in agreement larry. Mayweather didnt fight killer after killer every fight but who else does? Pretty much every fighter he fought was of world level, most fighters at the moment do well to fight someone with a pulse every two years, and 99 percent of fighters follow the pattern of fighting a good fight then a bum or two after. Rare that he fought someone completely useless. I want to know who these supposed killers mayweather was dodging were? Pacquiao still had plenty in the tank when they fought, he lost to marquez but arguably he lost to marquez earlier in his career too. The job he did on bradley shows he wasnt a shot fighter, and mayweather was no spring chicken when they fought. How mayweather can be called a cherry picker with the guys he fought i dont know. Every fighter going must be a cherry picker then...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by larry x.. View Post
      I dont get how people slam floyd and have favorite current fighters..no one is taking the challenges he did, fighters are not taking risks and yet you slam Floyd?? What fighter is even close to being lineal in 4 different divisions?? what fighters are fighting p4p fighters on a regular basis?? what fighters are even fighting other champions fight after fight?
      if you cherry pick long enough you can build up a nice little resume and thats what he did. no one is saying hes a bum but to act like he was trying to take on all challegers is laughable. he constantly came up with excuses not to fight people(unless they were guys like baldomir) didn't see the excuses flying then.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by daggum View Post
        if you cherry pick long enough you can build up a nice little resume and thats what he did. no one is saying hes a bum but to act like he was trying to take on all challegers is laughable. he constantly came up with excuses not to fight people(unless they were guys like baldomir) didn't see the excuses flying then.
        True, Floyd just is nt known to be risk taker. He's famous for his cautiousness in fact.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by daggum View Post
          if you cherry pick long enough you can build up a nice little resume and thats what he did. no one is saying hes a bum but to act like he was trying to take on all challegers is laughable. he constantly came up with excuses not to fight people(unless they were guys like baldomir) didn't see the excuses flying then.
          Brain Kenny said he was ducking Baldomir and Hatton

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            True, Floyd just is nt known to be risk taker. He's famous for his cautiousness in fact.
            what risks should he have taken?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              True, Floyd just is nt known to be risk taker. He's famous for his cautiousness in fact.
              Moved from 130 to 154 winning titles along the way.

              That's not even possible without taking risks....but what would you know...you're a ****ing Brit

              Comment


              • #37
                I think his carefully managed career really gave a false impression. A guy that arguably lost to Castillo and Maidana can't be as good as what some would have you believe Mayweather is. He did well to avoid prime, hungry atg's.

                Wins like Mosley, Marquez mean next to nothing under the circumstances Mayweather won them. Hell, look at the Hatton fight, as a fight to compare to look at the Kovalev Ward fight and tell me that wouldn't have been a different fight if the ref constantly broke them up after Ward worked to get inside, he'd have never scored most of his points and Kovalev would have been fresher, aswell as on the outside to get tagged more. These are the circumstances Mayweather wins under, and no the Maidana rematch wasn't convincing, the the scores were pretty much the same except this time the difference was the uncalled for point deduction. That fight would also have been very different without Mayweather's tampering with the refereeing. The guy is as much a fraud as they come and I really don't like using that word.

                He has admitted to paying Alex Ariza to not work with Garcia's fighters for the rematch with Maidana. Effectively sabotaging a camp. Is this considered cool? When I'm watching boxing I want to see who can win at their best, I don't want a guy showing up outta shape because a fighter took his S&C from him. Like I said, fraud.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
                  I think his carefully managed career really gave a false impression. A guy that arguably lost to Castillo and Maidana can't be as good as what some would have you believe Mayweather is. He did well to avoid prime, hungry atg's.

                  Wins like Mosley, Marquez mean next to nothing under the circumstances Mayweather won them. Hell, look at the Hatton fight, as a fight to compare to look at the Kovalev Ward fight and tell me that wouldn't have been a different fight if the ref constantly broke them up after Ward worked to get inside, he'd have never scored most of his points and Kovalev would have been fresher, aswell as on the outside to get tagged more. These are the circumstances Mayweather wins under, and no the Maidana rematch wasn't convincing, the the scores were pretty much the same except this time the difference was the uncalled for point deduction. That fight would also have been very different without Mayweather's tampering with the refereeing. The guy is as much a fraud as they come and I really don't like using that word.

                  He has admitted to paying Alex Ariza to not work with Garcia's fighters for the rematch with Maidana. Effectively sabotaging a camp. Is this is cool? When I'm watching boxing I want to see who can win at their best, I don't want a guy showing up outta shape because a fighter took his S&C from him. Like I said, fraud.
                  Mayweather beat Hatton up on the inside what are you talkign about?? and carefully managed?? he had fighting for a title in his 17th fight and the Maidana fight was when he was 37..tell me other great fighters who were still p4p #1 at 37...ILL WAIT!!!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by larry x.. View Post
                    Brain Kenny said he was ducking Baldomir and Hatton

                    Oh how soon they forget.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      never thot pacquiao could beat mayweather;

                      jmm always troubled pacquiao

                      i always wanted to see mayweather vs prime sergio martinez at 154

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP