Comments Thread For: Stiverne Says Team Povetkin's Claim of Low Ratio is Irrelevant

[firstborn]

[QUOTEStiverne should have fought the fight][/QUOTE]

Because after he tested dirty, Povetkin was still willing to go forward with the fight.

Why? Riddle me that?

If "rules are rules" as he says, then why after he tested dirty, was he more than willing to proceed with the fight?

Hahah - gonna love to hear this response.

Apparently Stiverne wasn't hard up for money and was only interested in the fight because it could lead to a title shot. I wouldn't have minded if he went through with it anyway but can't knock him for declining a "stay busy" fight.

[Clegg]

Povetkin's ratio is always so low is because he only uses new diet coke steroids.

[Tobi.G]

Stiverne has old-man flab on him he should train harder.

[JWHardin]

Does this fat bytch have any idea how ****** he sounds?

This MF popped dirty too! But yet you weren't "disqualified" from the fight going forward, were you?

WHY? Because Povetkin is a real man, with balls; you are a chubby bytch with a vagina.

If "rules are rules," and you tested dirty for a banned substance, why were you more than willing to proceed with the fight when Povetkin said "we're gonna knock this fat bytch out anyway, who cares"?


I hope to never see your fat, slow, plodding, worthless ass on my television screen again. FoH you hypocritical, fat, emasculated hoe.

Stiverne's "dirty" test was from a 5 hr energy drink he took right in front of the tester. It was quickly investigated and confirmed. It was not a steriod type drug like Povetkin took, and is the reason why they fined Stiverne and decided to still sanction the fight.

[Kigali]

Stiverne should have fought the fight

Povetkin should not have cheated...again.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Stiverne should have fought the fight

If Povetkin was black or signed to Haymon you wouldn't be saying that

[joe strong]

Because after he tested dirty, Povetkin was still willing to go forward with the fight.

Why? Riddle me that?

If "rules are rules" as he says, then why after he tested dirty, was he more than willing to proceed with the fight?

Hahah - gonna love to hear this response.

I think Stiverne failed for a energy drink which was confirmed & he paid a $75000 fine. Povetkin failed for a PED. I like Povetkin & was pretty impressed with his comeback from the Klitschko loss. He beat 5 good fighters but unfortunately it looks like he did it cheating. 2 failed tests not one. 2 different PEDS & I don't care about the first failed test. He got a mulligan after the investigation but the 2nd failed test is what it is. So if Stiverne fights anyway & gets hurt regardless of winning or losing he would be out his opportunity. He could still get paid if a lawsuit happens as that seems to be what follows a Ryabinsky card that is cancelled due to a failed drug test. He would also not lose his ranking or shot at another final eliminator. He was advised not to fight by his lawyer & promoter.

[Robbie Barrett]

Wasn't Stiverne going to get $1.75 mil for this fight? He should have gone through with it. I doubt he ever gets a pay day like that the rest of his career.

[Kigali]

If Povetkin was black or signed to Haymon you wouldn't be saying that

[Robbie Barrett]

Stiverne's "dirty" test was from a 5 hr energy drink he took right in front of the tester. It was quickly investigated and confirmed. It was not a steriod type drug like Povetkin took, and is the reason why they fined Stiverne and decided to still sanction the fight.

Stiverne says that doesn't matter. He had a banned substance and he should be automatically disqualified.