OK, I just saw Hatton/Collazo..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Easy-E
    Gotta want it
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 22686
    • 865
    • 1,739
    • 32,777

    #11
    Originally posted by JuicyJuice
    Anybody who takes this fight seriously, is a dummy.

    Hatton clearly just looks like a blown-up light-welterweight in there, a useless lump of lard!

    Quite honestly, this fight is ridiculous. Hatton was weighing 160 on the night according to Billy Graham, there is no way he could of moved anywhere near as sharp as he usually does (he usually weighs 152-154 on the night) and clearly doesn't - it's almost hideous. Hatton looks slow, sloppy, and laughable. He put on unneccasary weight, it was a silly mistake to move up to 147. He should of let Mayweather come back down (remember that Mayweather had to start using weights for the first time ever to build his body up towards 140, whereas Hatton has always used weights since he was a kid).

    If Hatton has an ounce of sense, he won't ever fight at 147 again. He makes 140 comfortably, absolutely no problem at all. Infact, he often had to eat up to seven meals a day to keep the weight on when aiming for 140.

    This fight is a laughing stock. I don't think Hatton could show much because he probably could barely climb off his stool between rounds - he was that much like a useless lump of lard in there, and it was Obviously due to carrying the extra weight (and shaken up by the naturally heavier punches than what he's used to - struggling for concentration in there because of the heavier punches). The whole fight Hatton literally just walked straight in, threw a few sloppy shots and then clinched.. it was laughable (seeing as this was RICKY HATTON). All Hatton could show really was that he had a rock-solid chin and determination.

    Collazo isn't world-class, IMO, he was a paper champion. Sure, his hands looked a little quick at times here and there.. but he wasn't all that effective against such a useless lump of lard. Any world-class, natural 147lber would of beaten Hatton easily last night. Collazo didn't impress me much, really, he just couldn't take advantage enough of Hatton's silly 'blown-upness' and desperate lack of any sharpness.
    I thought the fight was exciting as hell.

    Comment

    • Super Cruiserweight
      Banned
      • May 2005
      • 298
      • 18
      • 24
      • 376

      #12
      Hbo Said Hatton Weighed 158 On The Night, Collazo Was 156.

      I Agree That Hatton Looked Bigger And Blobbier Than Usual And Was Not Ripped.

      Poor Performance But Mainly Because He Was Too Heavy Imo.

      Comment

      • Super Cruiserweight
        Banned
        • May 2005
        • 298
        • 18
        • 24
        • 376

        #13
        Originally posted by !! Mr. Soprano
        Hatton was 156 I do believe... just 2-3 pounds over his usual..
        HBO SAID HATTON WAS 158. THEY SAID COLLAZO WAS 156.

        158 IS TOO HEAVY FOR A 5'6" GUY IMO.

        Comment

        • Left2body
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 6200
          • 269
          • 277
          • 13,212

          #14
          Originally posted by Smokin'
          no he did not need to move up, he comfortably makes 140 regularly. He does not belong at 147, he is too small, and even his frame is probably too small.

          DLT, you're just as bias as the rest of them, it's obvious you have only seen 3 of Hatton's fights and are critisizing him based on those. Maussa- very tricky and awkward
          Collazo- SOUTHPAW, tricky, awkward
          Zoo- Only way he could of fought Zoo is to rough him up, because he can't outbox him.

          get the **** out of here if you're not going to think of the big picture. at least hatton has fought for 3 straight belts. enough we can say for pretty girl.
          LOL...here is what you said before the fight:

          Floydmayweather-
          no but anyone who sees Hatton blow up between fights know this is gonna help him. Just watch the fight and we will see. Peace


          Then on the very next post you say:

          That's a seriously good point FloydMayweather. Hatton also has a size advatnage of 15 pounds evne with all the draining down and such by fight time. This is going to help him so much.

          So which is it? Is he to small or does he have a size advantage

          I like Hatton, he's an exciting fighter, but its comical on how some guys can take the same facts and flip them a few hours later.

          Here is the thread where you said that:
          Talk about anything boxing related here. Where the boxing discussion is always Non Stop!

          Comment

          • Super Cruiserweight
            Banned
            • May 2005
            • 298
            • 18
            • 24
            • 376

            #15
            Originally posted by DLT
            Dude, this is a excuse. Hatton came in at normal weight for a guy who fights at 147 and he was close to what he comes in at for 140 fights.

            Why does Hatton get a pass? You guys act like he's the only guy who ever moved up. Floyd has fought 2 fights at 147 and has came into the ring at just 146 pounds. If there is a guy who clearly doesnt belong at that weight, its Floyd but he still looks good there so why shouldnt Hatton?

            What makes you think he was blown up? He fought at a higher weight so obviously he weighed more. How can a guy that balloons up after every fight, then gets all the way down to 147 look blown up? Alot of fighters have moved up and some have looked good and some havent but none of them got passes for there performances and e****ally when your a guy as huge as Hatton.

            He needed to move up, just like Cotto does. Sure they can fight at 140 for longer but they are killing themselves to make it. Floyd makes 140 easy but still fights at 147 and will soon fight at 154. I bet he doesnt even come into the ring weighing 150 for a 154 pound fight but he will still go at it against a great fighter in Oscar.

            Hatton looked bad but it wasnt because of weight. It was because he fought the best or easily the 2nd best guy he has ever fought. If they fought at 140, then it wouldve been the same thing
            HATTON HAS A LIGHTWEIGHT FRAME IMO, PBF HAS THE FRAME TO KEEP GOING UP. AND U TRYING TO SAY THAT HATTON DIDN'T LOOK PLUMP AND SLOW? HE DID NOT LOOK RIPPED, DID NOT LOOK FAST LIKE HE NORMALLY DOES. HATTON'S BODY USUALLY LOOKS WAAY TIGHTER THAN THAT BRO, I TAPED HIS FIGHTS THAT WERE ON SHOWTIME AND HE NEVER LOOKED THAT PLUMP AND SOFT

            Comment

            • Smokin'
              Man On Fire
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 10227
              • 427
              • 407
              • 12,939

              #16
              EXIGE, stop the act please.

              Anyways, after the fight of course I'm going to flip it around like that. My original opinion that the move up to 147 was wrong, so what's the big deal. Hatton was at 158 and it didn't help him thus it won't be beneficial to him afterwards.

              *****.

              Comment

              • Easy-E
                Gotta want it
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22686
                • 865
                • 1,739
                • 32,777

                #17
                Originally posted by Smokin'
                EXIGE, stop the act please.

                Anyways, after the fight of course I'm going to flip it around like that. My original opinion that the move up to 147 was wrong, so what's the big deal. Hatton was at 158 and it didn't help him thus it won't be beneficial to him afterwards.

                *****.
                I wasnt sure if you were winning this little debate or not, but when you called him a *****, i knew that you were much smarter, were right in this situation, and know alot more about boxing then he does.

                Comment

                • Smokin'
                  Man On Fire
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 10227
                  • 427
                  • 407
                  • 12,939

                  #18
                  That means alot coming from a Floyd nuthugger.

                  Anyways, Hatton disproved my point. What's the big deal?

                  Comment

                  • Super Cruiserweight
                    Banned
                    • May 2005
                    • 298
                    • 18
                    • 24
                    • 376

                    #19
                    I Have Just Now Watched The Start Of Hatton/kostya Again And Showtime Say That Hatton Weighs 147 And Kostya Weights 149. So Thats 11 Pounds Difference From What Hbo Say Hatton Weighed (158) Against Collazo
                    Last edited by Super Cruiserweight; 05-14-2006, 11:01 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Smokin'
                      Man On Fire
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 10227
                      • 427
                      • 407
                      • 12,939

                      #20
                      I heard Hatton didn't have a proper training camp. It was shorter then usual.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP