I think we can All agree Lomachenko dominated a prime fighter more than mayweather.

[Motorcity Cobra]

I guess people forget Manny was top 5 p4p when Floyd beat him last year and he's top 10 p4p now. Marquez was top 5 p4p too. He's beaten 3 top 5 p4p fighters and Loma lost to a journeyman. You people are crazy!!

[champion4ever]

All C'mon man with the Mayweather obsessions and comparisons. The man is retired so let him enjoy the next chapter of his life.

Chances are Lomachenko no matter how good and effective he looks now would not retire undefeated and that's a fact.

[Motorcity Cobra]

bullsheet and you know it

OK of its BS then compare Floyd's resume at age 27 to Loma's resume at 27

[koolkc107]

OK of its BS then compare Floyd's resume at age 27 to Loma's resume at 27

Here is a partial list of fighters Floyd had beat by 2004, when he turned 27:

Genaro Hernandez
Angel Manfredy
Emanuel Augustas
Diego Corrales
Carlos Hernandez
Jesus Chavez
Jose Luis Castillo (twice)

I like Loma too, but comparisons with Floyd right now are very, very, very premature.

[b00g13man]

Floyd on the mind...

[Dip_Slide]

I loved diego but he was a punching bag that could fight back. do you see what Lomo has done 8 fights??? payweather was beating up pizza delivery guys at 8 fights. froid would have gotten KO'd at 8 fights if the fought the level of fighter Lomo has

At 8 fights Floyd was 19 fighting grown ass men, Lomachenko is 28 with a very long amateur career. This has nothing to do with the thread btw, the thread was about Lomachenko's win over Walters and how it is supposedly better than any single win on Floyd's resume and that's what I addressed in my post.

Deigo Corrales was #5 P4P, #1 at 130 pounds, much bigger than Floyd and KOed a string of top fighters at 130 lbs. Diego Corrales recieved that reputation of being a punching bag AFTER he was thoroughly outclassed by Floyd Mayweather, something that nobody ever did to him before or after their fight. Diego Corrales was a betting favorite when the fight got made.

On the other hand u have Walters, very strong puncher at 126, beat a lot of good fighters at 126 but struggled at 130 and took a year off before the fight, never was in the discussion of being P4P rated and was a clear underdog going into the fight.

[nacho daddy]

At 8 fights Floyd was 19 fighting grown ass men, Lomachenko is 28 with a very long amateur career. This has nothing to do with the thread btw, the thread was about Lomachenko's win over Walters and how it is supposedly better than any single win on Floyd's resume and that's what I addressed in my post.

Deigo Corrales was #5 P4P, #1 at 130 pounds, much bigger than Floyd and KOed a string of top fighters at 130 lbs. Diego Corrales recieved that reputation of being a punching bag AFTER he was thoroughly outclassed by Floyd Mayweather, something that nobody ever did to him before or after their fight. Diego Corrales was a betting favorite when the fight got made.

On the other hand u have Walters, very strong puncher at 126, beat a lot of good fighters at 126 but struggled at 130 and took a year off before the fight, never was in the discussion of being P4P rated and was a clear underdog going into the fight.

yea yea yea whatever you say black panther all cab drivers are grown ass men

[PivotandRoll]

the money version atleast.

Lomachenko is definitely p4p top 3.

You and 90% of people on this boards are morons if you actually believe this. Walters was clipped by Donaire at the end of round one and literally was blessed the round was over and then won with a punch to the back of the head. Walters was never more than a big guy with power.

Loma needs to beat someone far better to be even top 8-5 P4P

[BrometheusBob.]

Hatton wasn't prime? Canelo? Marquez? You're saying the money version so you're basically saying past prime Floyd compared to prime Lomachenko

TS shoulda packed it up after this post smh

[PivotandRoll]

yea yea yea whatever you say black panther

Ha, You got shut down and had nothing to say.