Comments Thread For: Mayweather: If Pacquiao Loses, They Will Blame it on Age

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NYC8224
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2016
    • 1238
    • 42
    • 0
    • 1,623

    #11
    Originally posted by boxinggod101
    Hmmm cause if Pac gets beat by Vargas.... it will be cause of age. A younger Pac destroy this guys... Come on Floyd, dont downgrade ur best win. And was he trying to play the victim again? Saying that if it was him bla bla bla?? Floyd a great boxer but a dumb@ss
    Floyd can't read and he talks like a 5 year old lol

    Comment

    • davef
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 2782
      • 565
      • 227
      • 28,056

      #12
      Originally posted by Nomadic
      The truth hurts, but Pac is old. Not that Vargas will beat him, but throw in some the new talent at WW and Pac will be in some trouble.

      Very true but if we could match a prime pacquiao or a prime floyd vs the current top WW pac and floyd would beat the dog**** out of them

      Comment

      • Bronx2245
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2013
        • 28582
        • 5,445
        • 1,436
        • 162,064

        #13
        It's a lose-lose for Vargas! If he loses, he was "a hype job," if he wins, "Pacquiao was old!"

        Comment

        • Mr. Objectivity
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2014
          • 1123
          • 31
          • 27
          • 7,554

          #14
          Originally posted by Bronx2245
          It's a lose-lose for Vargas! If he loses, he was "a hype job," if he wins, "Pacquiao was old!"
          Its the nature of the game.
          He needs to be consistently IMPRESSIVE to be considered a legend.

          Comment

          • Bronx2245
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2013
            • 28582
            • 5,445
            • 1,436
            • 162,064

            #15
            Originally posted by Mr. Objectivity
            Its the nature of the game.
            He needs to be consistently IMPRESSIVE to be considered a legend.
            He has a very long way to go to be a "legend." A KO tonight and a win vs. Crawford will put him on the right path!

            Comment

            • Mr. Objectivity
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2014
              • 1123
              • 31
              • 27
              • 7,554

              #16
              Originally posted by Bronx2245
              He has a very long way to go to be a "legend." A KO tonight and a win vs. Crawford will put him on the right path!
              i know right.

              The word "legend" gets thrown out like its nothing, these days.

              Vargas should fight the best and win most of those fight impressively for the next five years before we can think about calling him one.

              Jermaine taylor was no legend.

              Comment

              • BodiesInFlight
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2013
                • 9297
                • 1,781
                • 1,363
                • 77,867

                #17
                Well it won't be because he's too green that's for sure.

                Comment

                • KLockard23
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 791
                  • 30
                  • 3
                  • 7,162

                  #18
                  Floyd's point was less about Pac's age not being a factor and more about the double standard of it. If Mayweather had lost at any point in the last three or four years of his career, his age would be considered an excuse. In Pac's case, it wouldn't.

                  Comment

                  • Gillie
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2016
                    • 1786
                    • 104
                    • 339
                    • 22,970

                    #19
                    Why does Floyd even care about Pacquiao's career and opponents? U would think that Pacquiao was the one who emerged victorious when they fought, based on all of these comments Floyd constantly throws his way. He seems so insecure despite all of the money and the undefeated record.

                    Comment

                    • Mr. Objectivity
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Oct 2014
                      • 1123
                      • 31
                      • 27
                      • 7,554

                      #20
                      Originally posted by KLockard23
                      Floyd's point was less about Pac's age not being a factor and more about the double standard of it. If Mayweather had lost at any point in the last three or four years of his career, his age would be considered an excuse. In Pac's case, it wouldn't.
                      Consider the multiple previous retirements on floyds part, His style of fighting and the number of legitimate WAR PAC has been in......to be fair

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP