Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Arum Explains How Broner Killed Pacquiao Fight, Rules Him Out

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
    So Broner gets TWO losses and goes the distance with TWO hard hitting Welterweights, and is a 4 Division Champ...

    Rios gets 4 million...

    Arum spikes his matzo-ball soup with the same laced up stuff Oscar was on in fishnets.
    how is that any different than fried chicken or watermelon references?

    not cool........

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
      how is that any different than fried chicken or watermelon references?

      not cool........
      don't pull a paradox card. You've been pro-Trump on this site...I have cited Arum for doing good deeds in citing what's great about ''Mexicanism'' and this pugilist sport, which is why Arum is disgusted by Trump, the guy you like..

      What's different than matzo-ball soup and fried chicken? Fried is fried, matzo-ball soup usually has a chicken broth. I don'T eat fried chicken nor matzo-ball soup. I also don't eat watermelon. But mexicans love watermelon. Almost every ''mexican'' picnic in the usa ala barbecue, each family is rocking watermelon.

      #paradoxbaitcard #onepunchfailure

      Comment


      • #63
        Broner didn't think he can beat the aging superstar. That's what killed the fight. No way around it.

        Comment


        • #64
          I'd happily pay to watch Pac bust AB up, but it would taste bitter knowing AB would walk away with $6 mill.

          Comment


          • #65
            I don't know if a fight with Broner would bring in enough PPV buys to justify $6 million. Maybe if this was the undefeated Broner a few years ago but he didn't even bother to show up in the Maidana/Porter fight and was looking to cash out. No one's going to take him seriously even if it is popular.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              fair call ^^

              but that wasn't the case..... Broner argued that he was worth more than 4mil NOW, from an absolute superstar..... Golovkin is arguing that he is worth more than 10mil NOW, from a wannabe superstar

              and I am arguing that the glaring difference between how YOU guys view those 2 examples seems to indicate a more-than-slight bias when it comes to the affairs of Golovkin

              how can you call Broner dumb and yet call Golovkin smart ?


              GGG holds 3 world titles in the division Canelo is going to be fighting in, and is likely to be holding all 4 by next Sept, which is when Canelo wants to fight him. (I believe BJS would much rather fight GGG, in the UK than Canelo in the States)

              GGG knows that Canelo needs to fight him, to wipe away the stain he put on his own rep by calling GGG into the ring and challenging him, then handing over his belt without a fight. Canelo has stated several times that he wants to fight GGG more than anybody else, and Oscar said the same thing yesterday.

              So GGG knows that Canelo wants the fight as much as he does, maybe even more, and he also knows he has a whole year to negotiate the best deal he can get. There is no reason at all for him to accept the first offer Oscar throws at him. That would be dumber than Broner turning down Arum's offer to fight Manny.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
                don't pull a paradox card. You've been pro-Trump on this site...I have cited Arum for doing good deeds in citing what's great about ''Mexicanism'' and this pugilist sport, which is why Arum is disgusted by Trump, the guy you like..

                What's different than matzo-ball soup and fried chicken? Fried is fried, matzo-ball soup usually has a chicken broth. I don'T eat fried chicken nor matzo-ball soup. I also don't eat watermelon. But mexicans love watermelon. Almost every ''mexican'' picnic in the usa ala barbecue, each family is rocking watermelon.

                #paradoxbaitcard #onepunchfailure

                the LAST thing I am is "pro-trump". I think the guy is a clown. That being said, I have no illusions about ANY of these scumbag politicians, regardless of party. The nihilist in me is sort of pulling for trump, because he provides the best chance of a total system collapse, which is something I would welcome. But dont think for a second that I "support" any of these fools.


                And as to your other point, spin all you want about cooking methods. It was an anti-semetic remark, totally inappropriate, and you know it.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                  the LAST thing I am is "pro-trump". I think the guy is a clown. That being said, I have no illusions about ANY of these scumbag politicians, regardless of party. The nihilist in me is sort of pulling for trump, because he provides the best chance of a total system collapse, which is something I would welcome. But dont think for a second that I "support" any of these fools.


                  And as to your other point, spin all you want about cooking methods. It was an anti-semetic remark, totally inappropriate, and you know it.
                  there's nothing anti-semitic about it. Americans don'T even know that the phrase is merely fabricated propaganda. That phrase itself has been highly controversial with even Chomsky stating it being rubbish. Arabs are semitic people. brush up on your anthropology 101 bruv

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View Post
                    there's nothing anti-semitic about it. Americans don'T even know that the phrase is merely fabricated propaganda. That phrase itself has been highly controversial with even Chomsky stating it being rubbish. Arabs are semitic people. brush up on your anthropology 101 bruv
                    lol keep telling yourself that............

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                      GGG holds 3 world titles in the division Canelo is going to be fighting in, and is likely to be holding all 4 by next Sept, which is when Canelo wants to fight him. (I believe BJS would much rather fight GGG, in the UK than Canelo in the States)

                      GGG knows that Canelo needs to fight him, to wipe away the stain he put on his own rep by calling GGG into the ring and challenging him, then handing over his belt without a fight. Canelo has stated several times that he wants to fight GGG more than anybody else, and Oscar said the same thing yesterday.

                      So GGG knows that Canelo wants the fight as much as he does, maybe even more, and he also knows he has a whole year to negotiate the best deal he can get. There is no reason at all for him to accept the first offer Oscar throws at him. That would be dumber than Broner turning down Arum's offer to fight Manny.

                      Golovkin will never get the WBO title, Canelo will.

                      Team GGGenius have likely already fk'd that fight up with the 1.5mil low-ball offer..... Saunders/Warren know that there are easier paths than having to deal with Team GGGenius.

                      They want that Canelo money.

                      And Canelo/GGG will be super-easy to negotiate when Canelo holds the WBO title, won't it?

                      Canelo has MANY options..... Cotto, Lemieux, Saunders, Eubank, Jacobs, etc..... so IF Golovkin misses out on that fight - and that is a distinct possibility - then he is going to look like a real dumb ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP