Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: WBA Denies Request To Modify Purse Bid Split

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Canelo and GGG View Post
    He will vacate its smart decison,25% is not worth it.
    Smart decision winning the IBO, IBF, WBA and WBC belts mean nothing and beating the number one ranked best middleweight would do nothing to his career.
    Lol, I think 30% is the right figure but with earning 25% off of say the third biggest name in boxing isn't bad.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by pacmanis1 View Post
      Yeah I can't recall any fight being on regular HBO or Showtime and having a purse over 3 million outside of maybe overseas fights with Wlad or Vitali, which is obviously an entirely different animal and they're not footing the whole bill. I just don't see any way you could pay theses guys what they want without putting it on PPV and I don't think it'd be big enough to recoup their loses.




      Comment


      • Originally posted by Triple Genius View Post
        I went to both GGG at MSG and Jacobs st Barclays, and those showings say otherwise. Well maybe 70/30-65/35 could work too
        GGG has fought before sellout crowds in L.A, New York and London and K2's got HBO money in hand to make a serious bid on that fight. Jacobs doesn't have that drawing power.

        75/25 aeems about right.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          Jacobs is a kid, and he already has Quillin on his resume.

          Golovkin is old, and he has Murray/Lemieux on his resume.

          when you go to google/images, and type in hypejob..... who's picture comes up?

          are you really going to deny the following fact ?

          FACT: Golovkin could do more to make this fight than offer Jacobs "Quillin money" and then request an early purse-bid.

          I will re-post the best post in this thread.....


          you guys know whats up, so stop playing dumb !
          Danny is 29/30 years old, he's not a kid anymore.

          Lemieux/Murray >> Quillin (put an APB out on the guy)

          searching google for "hypejob" proves what? nothing

          Golovkin is the fighter, not the promoter/manager, so there is nothing he can do aside from instructing his team to let him fight for "short(er) money"

          but why would he do that? the importance of this fight is overhyped. I do not see it being overly competitive.

          Danny's athletic gifts and skillful boxing technique provides a few wrinkles that we haven't seen vs GGG, but we already know DJ's chin is fragile while GGG's is granite. GGG by KO5.

          This fight's not a huge money maker...it takes two to make things go right, and the B-side is not a draw anywhere in the world. Like I said before, DJ is lucky to get 75/25...if not for PBC he'd be making less than Curtis Stevens (who actually draws a crowd going back to his Chin Checker days)

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post




            Thanks but that is between two fights so it's slightly different. However let's say I'm wrong though and this fight goes for 5 million, do you think Jacobs fights for 1.25 million?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              are you an idiot ?

              how could you possibly endorse Jacobs getting paid "Quillin money"?

              why would you f@ggots fixate on how much a fighter makes to the point where you think it is fair that he takes what is essentially a pay-cut?

              I don't give a fk about Jacobs money, I can just see the distinct pattern of Team Bull**** laying out the red carpet to fight the guys who they REALLY want to fight, but then making things "difficult" for the guys they are happy to pass on.

              Team Bull**** clearly do not value this fight as much as the fans do.
              Lmao. Mr. Contradiction strikes again. Look at that ******. Here he says that he doesn't care about Jacobs money, while most of what the self proclaimed ****head posts is how he would be perfectly fine with Jacobs walking away from this 'dangerous fight' if he doesn't get more than he is entitled to.



              Comment


              • Originally posted by mapleleaf27 View Post
                Don't get me wrong would love to see a 'stacked' show. I just don't think there is much incentive for GYM to send their fighters to fight on the 'road'. Boxing is so low on the radar here in Canada, if you take the Canelo fight as a yardstick and that sold 250000 PPV allegedly, in Canada we are 1/10 the population of the
                US, how many extra viewers up here could make that much of a difference? The logistics to broadcast the event would not add up... GYM does not even send any fighters for tuneups here in Toronto.
                I've read that Toronto has a pretty weird boxing commission, though.

                Also, which Canelo fight are you speaking of? If Alvarez-Smith did 250k alleged PPV buys, you'd imagine that Golovkin-Jacobs could pull in something similar (especially if paired with two fights that Canadians would seemingly be interested in seeing).

                With DiBella basically not expecting much from Canada, have Michel keep the Canadian TV money (or most of it). If adding a Canadian to the bill puts an extra $1m into the pot for DiBella, that looks like a win/win for me.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                  Wow we got another Scipio in training, just clueless. Show me another fight on premium cable with 5m in total purse. Lemieux was ppv dummy. Jacobs previous mega fight did 380k viewers and 8.5k at Barclays, and this guy thinks it's a 10m fight lol. Thurman and Porter just split 2.4m in purse. Wake up!
                  The Jacobs-Quillin fight card had payouts that approached $5m; $3m disclosed for the main event, Cuellar got $200k, Oquendo got $100k, Chris Algieri headlining SHOExtreme (nothing seems to be definitive, but it seems as if Algieri took home $200k-$250k on the fight), and another two fights to support SHOExtreme. nice try though.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                    Ok troll. Pac passed on 40m flat, and now even the most delusional types recognize that was a weak duck move by Floyd
                    Mayweather-Pacquiao was arguably double what anyone was willing to project, Pacquiao took home the payday on that fight and another $20m in the Bradley fight, yet Manny Pacquiao still feels compelled to fight, and has openly said so for the Jessie Vargas fight, to support his family financially.

                    If Pacquiao really took home what you think he took home, yet is still fighting for a paycheck, he's either a fool who's gotten swindled out of his money or an idiot who's consistently spent money he never even had.

                    Floyd got his money, fulfilled the last fight on his deal, and went home. Pacquiao fought Floyd and Bradley, yet he's back fighting for a paycheck 6 months after "retiring". gtfoh.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
                      that fight is a year away dummy, no need to accept the first offer........
                      Lock in terms before the subsequent offers get worse, tbh. GBP/Canelo feel that Golovkin's worth to the fight (at 160lbs) is $10m; Golovkin delaying the offer, leaves him needing to show how he's worth more.

                      If the Jacobs fight falls through, where does Golovkin go to show that he deserves a share? Billy Joe Saunders, though a quality operator, has less name ID in the US than Liam Smith did. Golovkin-Saunders is unlikely to do monster business in NYC or the UK.

                      Golovkin possibly picks up another belt, but the business not manifesting likely leaves Golden Boy's next offer being $8m, or less.

                      With K2 continuing to be tricky at the negotiating table, that's the risk that they're taking.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP