Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: WBA Denies Request To Modify Purse Bid Split

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Kigali View Post
    Pirog would have KO'd a 23 y/o Golovkin as well.
    GGG never been phased in his career. Nice try.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Kigali View Post
      Mr 97K passed up 10 million....stop making excuses.
      Mr 200k can go F him self if he think he can just move up to 160 and make money fighting GGG left overs )))) 60/40 split

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kigali View Post
        Mr 97K passed up 10 million....stop making excuses.
        Ok troll. Pac passed on 40m flat, and now even the most delusional types recognize that was a weak duck move by Floyd

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Kigali View Post
          You Golovit.rds are the worse....
          You're the one having a meltdown because your hero might prevent this fight from happening.

          And I'm no Golovturd. Keep crying.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Kigali View Post
            Mr 97K passed up 10 million....stop making excuses.
            That fight isn't happening for another year if at all. Still plenty of time for negotiations.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
              Wow we got another Scipio in training, just clueless. Show me another fight on premium cable with 5m in total purse. Lemieux was ppv dummy. Jacobs previous mega fight did 380k viewers and 8.5k at Barclays, and this guy thinks it's a 10m fight lol. Thurman and Porter just split 2.4m in purse. Wake up!
              You just spit a lot of facts that have no correlation. Each fight stands on its own. People pay for match ups just as people pay for individual fighters. Don't be a simpleton. Also, please go back and read where I indicated that premium seats prices would make up what the networks don't cover. Let me help you understand something...a fights monetary value isn't determined by if it's on ppv or not. Some fights are directed to ppv to maximize it's value, but nothing says that the networks cannot or will not put money up for this type of fight to be on their network.

              You must get treated like whale dung at work because you get on these threads and start calling people names like a school girl when folks don't agree with you.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                No need for a correction, from Jacobs own mouth:

                ‘Wait a second. I could fight two Peter Quillins and make the same thing.’
                So how much was the offer genius? In dollar anount. No assumptions...no interpretations. Quote a dollar amount. If you can't, tour opinion on what "kinda close to that" and "fight two Peter Quillins" is no better than anyone elses on NSB.

                Comment


                • I'm confident the fight gets made

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                    Except that's the biggest fight in boxing, no flat fees apply. And this is not a super megafight as Jacobs thinks
                    Exactly why can't a flat fee apply buddy? Explain? Who wrote that rule?

                    Comment


                    • I'm more confident this fight gets made than Spence vs Brook

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP