Originally posted by mapleleaf27
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: WBA Denies Request To Modify Purse Bid Split
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostJacobs would've been better off not having a belt. For being better than the rest of GGG's opponents he's going to get paid less.
and Golovkin's unbiased fanbase have no problem with that
despite the fact that their hypejob desperately needs a marquee fight
I will NEVER understand that
fine, so Jacobs will pass..... and Golovkin will fight yet another no-hoper, and make yet another easy 2mil SIGH
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postand Golovkin's unbiased fanbase have no problem with that
despite the fact that their hypejob desperately needs a marquee fight
I will NEVER understand that
fine, so Jacobs will pass..... and Golovkin will fight yet another no-hoper, and make yet another easy 2mil SIGH
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View PostWhat % do you reckon Danny deserves AFT? Myself I reckon probably 30 - 35% would be fair, but I still think he would be well advised to take it even at the mandated 25% split, fair or not.
that is exactly what I think
The WBA should not have allowed Team Golovkin to manipulate Team Jacobs into this position..... if they REALLY wanted that fight, they should have adjusted the split.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SilverMiles View PostJacobs goes to the WBA first = K2 not negotiating in good faith.
How do you come to these redundant conclusions.
by using the common-sense that you seem to be lacking
when it became obvious that Team Golovkin were unwilling to negotiate in good faith, Team Jacobs knew that they were going to a purse-bid - whether Team Golovkin requested an early purse-bid or not, and they DID..... so Team Jacobs requested that the split be adjusted
CLEARLY fkn obvious LMAO
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postare you an idiot ?
how could you possibly endorse Jacobs getting paid "Quillin money"?
why would you f@ggots fixate on how much a fighter makes to the point where you think it is fair that he takes what is essentially a pay-cut?
I don't give a fk about Jacobs money, I can just see the distinct pattern of Team Bull**** laying out the red carpet to fight the guys who they REALLY want to fight, but then making things "difficult" for the guys they are happy to pass on.
Team Bull**** clearly do not value this fight as much as the fans do.
I keep telling you guys Golovkin is washed-up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mapleleaf27 View PostEverybody is a tough guy online, How did people like you get any self esteem before the internet? I would bet huge money if we were in a pub that is if you are old enough to get into a pub, you would not be speaking to my face like that, huge man. like I said sport, get a life, there is more to this world then being a keyboard warrior leaving 20 posts a day, blowing hot air.
that clown would end up lying in my driveway on his face, like everyone else
I wasn't gonna dignify the response, but hey
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostBasically. Except only one of them is considered a pound for pounder. I'm withholding judgement until we see what happened with negotiation. But for Golovkin, 2016 was quite disappointing and I'm just SMH if we're going on year #3 of the "Hanging on Canelo's tit hoping for some cream" movement.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostJacobs would've been better off not having a belt. For being better than the rest of GGG's opponents he's going to get paid less.
Comment
Comment