Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: WBA Denies Request To Modify Purse Bid Split
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
You just spit a lot of facts that have no correlation. Each fight stands on its own. People pay for match ups just as people pay for individual fighters. Don't be a simpleton. Also, please go back and read where I indicated that premium seats prices would make up what the networks don't cover. Let me help you understand something...a fights monetary value isn't determined by if it's on ppv or not. Some fights are directed to ppv to maximize it's value, but nothing says that the networks cannot or will not put money up for this type of fight to be on their network.Wow we got another Scipio in training, just clueless. Show me another fight on premium cable with 5m in total purse. Lemieux was ppv dummy. Jacobs previous mega fight did 380k viewers and 8.5k at Barclays, and this guy thinks it's a 10m fight lol. Thurman and Porter just split 2.4m in purse. Wake up!
You must get treated like whale dung at work because you get on these threads and start calling people names like a school girl when folks don't agree with you.Comment
-
So how much was the offer genius? In dollar anount. No assumptions...no interpretations. Quote a dollar amount. If you can't, tour opinion on what "kinda close to that" and "fight two Peter Quillins" is no better than anyone elses on NSB.Comment
-
-
)))) 60/40 split
Comment