GGG's competition - how good is it?

[HeroBando]

Hopkins record was for defending the IBF 20 times

Calzaghe's was for defending the WBO 21 times

and those were already watered down from the lineal title defenses

GGG has no lineal title and his only so called record was for the WBA which is complete joke...

Now you wanna add a defense when he didnt even defend that belt?

A Wbo defense counts for more than a defense of the unified IBF+Wbc belt? I don't think so. Repeat after me:. Brook was a Mw title defense.

[HeroBando]

Title defences of the same title you dumb ****. You Lil G fans are ****ing pathetic. You count defences of "regular" title and then want to count fights where the belt wasn't even up for grabs. Anything to hype the hype job.

It's Mw title defenses, simpleton.

[Robbie Barrett]

It's Mw title defenses, simpleton.

Consecutive defences of a MW title. WBA, WBC and IBF are DIFFERENT TITLES.

[Larry the boss]

A Wbo defense counts for more than a defense of the unified IBF+Wbc belt? I don't think so. Repeat after me:. Brook was a Mw title defense.

Let me break this down for you...since they began having multiple title belts the defenses ARE FOR THE TITLE BELT!!!!! the Brook fight went toward his IBF and WBC title defense...THE WBA WHICH HE GETS THE CREDIT FOR DEFENDING WAS NOT ON THE LINE

If he was lineal then it would be different..for instance Larry Holmes had20 title defenses but dropped the WBC for the IBF...BUT HE WAS LINEAL CHAMP....

[Larry the boss]

Consecutive defences of a MW title. WBA, WBC and IBF are DIFFERENT TITLES.

He really does not get it at all

[HeroBando]

Consecutive defences of a MW title. WBA, WBC and IBF are DIFFERENT TITLES.

They're all mw titles. You go ahead and track defenses of the same alphabet title, everybody else cares about Mw title defenses

[Larry the boss]

They're all mw titles. You go ahead and track defenses of the same alphabet title, everybody else cares about Mw title defenses

No you are literally making that rule up yourself

[Robbie Barrett]

They're all mw titles. You go ahead and track defenses of the same alphabet title, everybody else cares about Mw title defenses

Defences when he wasn't even the true WBA champ? You admitted yourself he was nothing but a mandatory.

It's like counting Jacobs as the WBA champ now.

[HeroBando]

Let me break this down for you...since they began having multiple title belts the defenses ARE FOR THE TITLE BELT!!!!! the Brook fight went toward his IBF and WBC title defense...THE WBA WHICH HE GETS THE CREDIT FOR DEFENDING WAS NOT ON THE LINE

If he was lineal then it would be different..for instance Larry Holmes had20 title defenses but dropped the WBC for the IBF...BUT HE WAS LINEAL CHAMP....

Again, nobody except your fellow idiot Clarke cares about consecutive defenses of any particular alphabet belt. Brook was a Mw title defense, that's all there is to it. Dunno why this is so hard, it's super obvious

[HeroBando]

No you are literally making that rule up yourself

Prove me wrong, show me the rule. Authoritative please, no bn247 crap