Danny Jacobs vs canelo, who wins and how?

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

I'm tired of people calling Canelo a big puncher.

[Redd Foxx]

I think Jacobs does better against GGG than he does Canelo, for stylistic considerations. Give Jacobs an opening and he's got enough power to hurt you. Golovkin is wide-open while Canelo is a little tighter in his guard (not a ton, but enough).
Ultimately, Jacobs loses to both, for the same reason. He might lose to Golovkin quicker because Canelo likes to take his time and look for openings rather than pressure. But, Danny's going to stand a better chance of landing on and hurting Golovkin than Canelo.

[John Locke]

Are we talking about the same guy here? Danny Jacobs 32 -1. Nothing about that record suggests someone who gets stopped as often as youre alluding to. Complete Nonsense John Locke, complete rubbish assessment..

Are you purposely playing ******? Because by now I'm sure you've realised that you're wrong, stop being stubborn.

Jacobs has been dropped and stopped by non-punchers, both as an amateur and as a pro. That's not my opinion. It's very obvious that he's not durable, I'm not sure what your agenda is here.

[pacmanis1]

I think it comes down to how well Canelo can take a Jacobs shot. One thing that stands out about Canelo's fights is how the guys he's fighting just seem too small and can't hurt him. He can be outboxed, and Jacobs isn't a bad boxer, but I feel Canelo'a boxing is underrated by some on here. I'd favor Canelo but he's never faced someone like Jacobs so I'd be more than willing to come back and admit I was wrong if Jacobs won.

[Kigali]

I think Jacobs does better against GGG than he does Canelo, for stylistic considerations. Give Jacobs an opening and he's got enough power to hurt you. Golovkin is wide-open while Canelo is a little tighter in his guard (not a ton, but enough).
Ultimately, Jacobs loses to both, for the same reason. He might lose to Golovkin quicker because Canelo likes to take his time and look for openings rather than pressure. But, Danny's going to stand a better chance of landing on and hurting Golovkin than Canelo.

I just had to laugh at all of that.

You'd think if Canelo were that good he would have won at least one round against little non punching Floyd.

[Kigali]

I'm tired of people calling Canelo a big puncher.

Me too............

[Redd Foxx]

I just had to laugh at all of that.

You'd think if Canelo were that good he would have won at least one round against little non punching Floyd.

Do you have anything insightful to add or of any value at all? Or, are you just going to act like another of of these little trolls with their "lol, he sucks" hit and run comments?

[Chollo Vista]

Canelo admits to not even being a full fledged MW and somehow people think he can get with Danny?

Danny is a huge MW that can not only crack, but can box. We're not talking about slow ass Angulo here or reckless James Kirkland.

People don't realize this, but Canelo was losing to Amir Khan. Jacobs has pretty damn fast combo's similar to Khan when he has his opponent hurt.

I've said it before and I'll say it again; taking punches from Amir Khan at 155 and Leon Smith at 154 is nothing like taking punches from Danny at 160.

I can't think of one fighter Canelo has fought as tall as Jacobs. Not one.

Canelo does horrible against guys that move. Canelo looked like schit against Mayweather, Lara, Trout, Khan (before the KO) and even Cotto. Cotto's not a real mover, but one can argue that Cotto outpointed Canelo.

Jacobs will provide movement, but the difference is when Jacobs lands, we're not talking about Amir Khan, Lara, Cotto or Leon Smith hitting him. We're talking about a full fledged Middleweight.

If Canelo was confident he could take punches from MW's he would've moved up a loooooong time ago. Obviously Canelo knows something you guys don't

[Elotero]

Are you purposely playing ******? Because by now I'm sure you've realised that you're wrong, stop being stubborn.

Jacobs has been dropped and stopped by non-punchers, both as an amateur and as a pro. That's not my opinion. It's very obvious that he's not durable, I'm not sure what your agenda is here.

Ahh so telling the truth is an agenda here eh? lmfao..

Only on NSB, a guy has 1 loss by KO from years ago and now he is chinny and not durable

Rigo gets dropped every few fights too. Still one of the best, if not THE best P4P. Kovalev is one of the top P4P supposedly was KOd in the AMs and dropped by non-puncher Blake Capperello. It happens. Are you questioning either of their durability or is that only when you co-sign a fighter?

[Chollo Vista]

Canelo was not losing to khan he was setting up traps and getting his timing down.

My mistake, Khan was only up on one scorecard.

Before the KO, Canelo was having problems with his speed. His corner even said they didn't think Khan would be that fast.