Danny Jacobs vs canelo, who wins and how?

[Bushbaby]

So who's win between these 2 and how does said fighter win??

An interesting fight between 2 big punchers, with Jacobs being taller and a natural middleweight while canelo flirts in between 154 and 160.

[John Locke]

I can't see anything other than a Canelo KO in this one, but for as long as it lasts, it would definitely be competitive. Jacobs would certainly win some early rounds. If Jacobs was more durable, it would be a real 50-50 fight, as it stands I'd favour Canelo 70-30.

[Beercules]

I wonder if Canelo can hurt Jacobs.

[Elotero]

So who's win between these 2 and how does said fighter win??

An interesting fight between 2 big punchers, with Jacobs being taller and a natural middleweight while canelo flirts in between 154 and 160.

with no cw jacobs puts canelo to sleep.

the difference? in his biggest fights canelo gets decision wins. jacobs gets ko wins. no experience canelo has had compares.

[Elotero]

I can't see anything other than a Canelo KO in this one, but for as long as it lasts, it would definitely be competitive. Jacobs would certainly win some early rounds. If Jacobs was more durable, it would be a real 50-50 fight, as it stands I'd favour Canelo 70-30.

you must be confusing danny jacobs with jorge linares or amir khan.

by this logic we can say canelo has a durability problem too seeing as how he was out on his feet once upon a time against cottos brother.

[The Gambler1981]

I think Canelo is the better boxer and while Canelo is not a very active fighter neither is Jacobs. Plus Jacobs is not that hard to find in the ring and if he were to run around that would take away what he does best which is throw powerful punches. It would be interesting and close I think unless Canelo manages to catch Jacobs and I think Cnaelo is the one more likely to drop Jacobs.

I would favor Canelo but Jacobs would have his chances as long as he made Canelo move his feet and was able to catch him moving in.

[John Locke]

you must be confusing danny jacobs with jorge linares or amir khan.

by this logic we can say canelo has a durability problem too seeing as how he was out on his feet once upon a time against cottos brother.

That's not even close to the same 'logic'. For starters, Canelo was hurt, not out on his feet. Secondly, that's the only time we've seen Canelo hurt, whereas Jacobs has been hurt, dropped and stopped numerous times, both as a pro and and amateur.

Canelo takes a good shot, Jacobs does not.

[Bushbaby]

with no cw jacobs puts canelo to sleep.

the difference? in his biggest fights canelo gets decision wins. jacobs gets ko wins. no experience canelo has had compares.

Jacobs is probably bigger than anyone canelo has faced. So from that aspect alone, he poses a threat. Plus he does have concussive power. And he has far more skill than Kirkland and Angulo combined. One stands to presume that canelo has yet to face that level of skill and power combined. Because canelo has faced both power and skill, but never in combination with a size advantage. So that is possible.

[Bushbaby]

I can't see anything other than a Canelo KO in this one, but for as long as it lasts, it would definitely be competitive. Jacobs would certainly win some early rounds. If Jacobs was more durable, it would be a real 50-50 fight, as it stands I'd favour Canelo 70-30.

I can see canelo hurting Jacobs. Hell Sergio Mora did. Even though canelo has been a weight class lower, he should hit a lot harder than Mora.

I do not disagree with the early rounds statement though. If Jacobs hurts canelo anytime early, I don't think canelo would finish strong late. I think canelo would need to remain in control throughout, to pull out the W.

[Elotero]

That's not even close to the same 'logic'. For starters, Canelo was hurt, not out on his feet. Secondly, that's the only time we've seen Canelo hurt, whereas Jacobs has been hurt, dropped and stopped numerous times, both as a pro and and amateur.

Canelo takes a good shot, Jacobs does not.

Are we talking about the same guy here? Danny Jacobs 32 -1. Nothing about that record suggests someone who gets stopped as often as youre alluding to. Complete Nonsense John Locke, complete rubbish assessment..