Brook. Khan. Who Is The Greater Fighter?

[M Bison]

Nelo knew he only needed one punch so Khan outpointingnelo should be taken with pinch of salt.

Was that the reason he chased Lara around the ring hopelessly trying to land headshots but failing miserably?
Come on now you just know he isn't stylistically suited for someone like Khan the only thing in Nelo favour was the chin of Khan that and that only Khan is superior to him in most areas apart from the chin the defense is equal.

[M Bison]

Carl Froch was the mandatory for Calzaghe's WBC belt.

He threw Mario Veit a bone in their epic rematch when he was mandatory.

He threw Ricky Thornberry a bone when he was mandatory.

He threw Mger Mkrtchyan a bone when he was mandatory.

Just not Carl Froch.

But for all these mandatories he took atleast we got great voluntaries such as Tucker Pudwill, Willy Mcintire and Branco Sobot. Hell, the epic USA vs UK clash on ITV with Peter Manfredo was a voluntary.

No bone for Carl Froch though.

Carl Froch was at 168
Joe Calzaghe was at the end of his career and he had moved up to 175lbs for the past two fights was Carl Froch worthy of coming down to 168 at 37-38yo?
I don't think so.

You don't take into consideration of what I said the only way that fight maybe have been realistic is If Carl was willing to move to 175 for Joe but even at that Carl would have done nothing for Joe's career absolutely nothing he already fought twice on the grand stage of America and beat two iconic legends..

[miniq]

Brook ducked Bradley
Khan's resume is 10x better

Khan actually became the best in his respective prime division 140...Brook beat Porter...

both are idiots in their own special way

What Khan did as an amatuer alone excels all of Brook's legacy lol!

[IronDanHamza]

Carl Froch was at 168
Joe Calzaghe was at the end of his career and he had moved up to 175lbs for the past two fights was Carl Froch worthy of coming down to 168 at 37-38yo?
I don't think so.

You don't take into consideration of what I said the only way that fight maybe have been realistic is If Carl was willing to move to 175 for Joe but even at that Carl would have done nothing for Joe's career absolutely nothing he already fought twice on the grand stage of America and beat two iconic legends..

He actually had only one fight at 175.

He decided to vacate his WBC title for an epic showdown with Roy Jones Jr's corpse instead.

[Canelo and GGG]

Brook ducked Bradley
Khan's resume is 10x better

Khan actually became the best in his respective prime division 140...Brook beat Porter...

both are idiots in their own special way

What Khan did as an amatuer alone excels all of Brook's legacy lol!

Spot on with this idiots ROFL green sent.

[Larry the boss]

Khan has clearly accomplished more, but head to head i would pick brook

[M Bison]

He actually had only one fight at 175.

He decided to vacate his WBC title for an epic showdown with Roy Jones Jr's corpse instead.

Nope both Roy Jones Jr and Bhop fight were within the 169-175 limits, ffs nobody even knew about Carl Froch you're talking in retrospect If people could tell the future and If they really cared much about him beating Jermain Taylor then sure that fight likely would happen but he just wasn't really that much hyped.

What made Carl Froch AND Andre Ward was the super six tournament you'd be hard pressed to find a casual Carl Froch fan that knows about his win over Jermain Taylor.

[KLockard23]

I agree with everything here but your scorecard at the stoppage, lol.

Brook only won one of those rounds the whole fight was obvious home cooking but gladly very gladly Golovkin dominated so badly that the judges never got to rob GGG of his belts and his 0.

However Khan was beating Canelo to the punch and outboxing him until he got caught with a big shot.

Khan took the harder fight over Kell Brook yet he doesn't want to fight him he simply said Brook had to prove his worth its the exact same scenario with Joe Calzaghe and Carl Froch, why should Joe Calzaghe throw Carl Froch a bone when Froch hadn't done jack shiet explain that to me?

Golovkin himself says he felt he lost every single round until he finally stopped Brook. He certainly has the bruises on his face to show for it.

[IronDanHamza]

Nope both Roy Jones Jr and Bhop fight were within the 169-175 limits, ffs nobody even knew about Carl Froch you're talking in retrospect If people could tell the future and If they really cared much about him beating Jermain Taylor then sure that fight likely would happen but he just wasn't really that much hyped.

What made Carl Froch AND Andre Ward was the super six tournament you'd be hard pressed to find a casual Carl Froch fan that knows about his win over Jermain Taylor.

No, the Roy Jones fight hadn't happened yet.

He vacated his title and then fought Roy Jones because everyone wanted to see that amazing match up.

[LacedUp]

Better fighter you could say so simply of Khan's chin being a -10 (with the exclusion of one fight against Maidana). If he had a smidgeon of chin, he would be ahead of Brook in the skill department. Even without a chin, his resume ****s of Brook's.

You say Brook could soon eclipse Khan's resume... How? He has beaten one good fighter, been obliterated by another, and that's been his career
And heads up, the argument isn't always "quality" as comparing Khan's win over Maidana to Brook's over Porter. Khan also has a HELL of a lot more quantity to his resume. Just look at soul survivor's post above us and you'll realize that...

So if Khan had a good chin it would all of a sudden also give him greater punch variety, defense, ring IQ etc? Give Khan a chin and Brook still beats his ass badly. Khan isn't on that level at all. He's a one-dimensional fighter who relies on his speed as its all he's got.

Lol sure. Khan's resume is filled up of has-beens. He's never beaten anyone good in their prime outside of Maidana. It's really nothing to boast of .