Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Never been any mention of who authorised the IV, only a paramedic

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
      Lance Armstrong never failed a test, say no more ****head
      Cycling: Lance Armstrong failed four drugs tests in 1999, UCI admits
      http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/g...s-8577491.html

      R.I.P

      Comment


      • If the athlete has an acute medical condition where an IV line was essential for treatment in a hospital admission, surgical procedure, or clinical investigation. Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete with signs of circulatory compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgical procedure, and IV line in the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc…
        Clinical investigations to diagnosis medical conditions, such a medical imaging, may also require IV administration of non-prohibited medicine which is permitted.
        In emergency circumstances, IVs may also be given by paramedical staff or physicians on the field of play, but an emergency TUE application is required as soon as reasonably possible after treatment has been received. Examples may include a semi- or unconscious athlete, an athlete who cannot tolerate oral fluids, or treatment of an acute injury.
        IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.------------- I think this answers the question about it being an emergency

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
          If the athlete has an acute medical condition where an IV line was essential for treatment in a hospital admission, surgical procedure, or clinical investigation. Examples would be a severely dehydrated athlete with signs of circulatory compromise, the need for an IV line during a surgical procedure, and IV line in the antibiotic treatment of an acute infection, etc…
          Clinical investigations to diagnosis medical conditions, such a medical imaging, may also require IV administration of non-prohibited medicine which is permitted.
          In emergency circumstances, IVs may also be given by paramedical staff or physicians on the field of play, but an emergency TUE application is required as soon as reasonably possible after treatment has been received. Examples may include a semi- or unconscious athlete, an athlete who cannot tolerate oral fluids, or treatment of an acute injury.
          IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.------------- I think this answers the question about it being an emergency
          yawwwnnnn. No one said it had to be an emergency. Keep trying. This is fun.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            LMAOOOOOOOOO. NOW YOU ARE JUMPING TO SOMETHING ELSE? YOU'RE AN EMBARRASSMENT.

            To answer your questions:

            1. How many tests did Armstrong pass?
            Not as many as he tried to claim.

            2. How many did he pass using an IV.
            Not sure. I do know that when he used an IV, he used it to manipulate his BLOOD and there was no test for EPO for the majority of the time that he used this method. When the test was developed, his samples FAILED.

            3. Is it used to mask LED's? LMAO.
            I ASSUME YOU THROW A BLANKET OVER AN LED TO MASK IT. LMAOOOOO
            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Cycling: Lance Armstrong failed four drugs tests in 1999, UCI admits
            http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/g...s-8577491.html

            R.I.P
            As I said, never failed a test, a TUE (sounds like floyd eh) and no b sample positives means he never failed a test numbnuts

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
              Never been any mention of who authorised the IV, only a paramedic
              Who cares who authorized it. This information is confidential and not even specifically necessary. You're reading from the section in one of WADA's notes that says "Medical Best Practices."

              Again, what is the document that you should be looking at? Oh yea, it's called the ISTUE.

              And if you weren't aware, the PHYSICIAN has to fill out part of the application for the TUE.

              From the ISTUE:
              9.3 The TUE application shall be dealt with in accordance with the principles of strict medical confidentiality. The members of the TUEC, independent experts and the relevant staff of the Anti-Doping Organization shall conduct all of their activities relating to the process in strict confidence and shall sign appropriate confidentiality agreements. In particular they shall keep the following information confidential:
              a. All medical information and data provided by the Athlete and physician(s) involved in the Athlete’s care.
              b. All details of the application, including the name of the physician(s) involved in the process.


              As per the TUE application:
              [IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-22%20at%2010.11.03%20PM.png[/IMG]

              Ready to give up?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                As I said, never failed a test, a TUE (sounds like floyd eh) and no b sample positives means he never failed a test numbnuts
                Here's another one:
                Lance Armstrong 'failed drugs test in 2001', claims former team-mate Tyler Hamilton in new book
                http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...-new-book.html


                Want more?

                Comment


                • Well if it wasn't an emergency then he needs to fulfill the criteria which he clearly hasn't, which means that usada is corrupt, all the intelligent people already knew that anyway

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                    Well if it wasn't an emergency then he needs to fulfill the criteria which he clearly hasn't, which means that usada is corrupt, all the intelligent people already knew that anyway
                    LMAO. He fulfilled the criteria. That's why the independent doctors in the TUEC approved the anonymous application.

                    Comment


                    • "Who cares who authorised it" you ****head loser, floyd probably has a taxi driver authorise it, armstrongs team mate CLAIMS, if that is true then that just means it was covered up, now you would have the ability to cover that up, USADA

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP