Everyone Wants to Talk About Floyd's IV - What About Pac-Monster's Toradol Abuse???

[IR0NFIST]

Sure. I give you knowledge for free. But you didn't answer the question.


If the urine was not diluted according to both the DCO and according to the laboratory, and the urine sample comes back negative, how do you think he is positive for PED's?

Let me know, bro.

This topic has been beaten to death in the Floyd Master IV thread. You know, the one that has damn near 1000 pages and over 8k posts.

Your argument against toradol has been completely destroyed. Seeing you reduced to making mindless and meaningless posts is a sad sight to behold. Someone needs to throw in the towel and save you from any further humiliation.

[travestyny]

This topic has been beaten to death in the Floyd Master IV thread. You know, the one that has damn near 1000 pages and over 8k posts.

Your argument against toradol has been completely destroyed. Seeing you reduced to making mindless and meaningless posts is a sad sight to behold. Someone needs to throw in the towel and save you from any further humiliation.

Oh really? Then why are you still evading my question?


Is Toradol allowed when there is no proof of an injury?


Making ****** images is never gonna change the fact that you're so butthurt about how I've destroyed you, that you're desperate and obsessed with me.

Keep trying, Zombie boy.

[IR0NFIST]

Oh really? Then why are you still evading my question?


Is Toradol allowed when there is no proof of an injury?


Making ****** images is never gonna change the fact that you're so butthurt about how I've destroyed you, that you're desperate and obsessed with me.

Keep trying, Zombie boy.

Is an IV allowed with no proof of an emergency?

[travestyny]

Is an IV allowed with no proof of an emergency?

Where in the ISTUE does it say there must be an emergency for an IV to be given?

I'll wait....


But if you can't find it.....lmaooooo....you're gonna look like a dunce.

Find it and post it. Waitinggggg.......

I suggest you go back into your grave, zombie boy.

[IR0NFIST]

Where in the ISTUE does it say there must be an emergency for an IV to be given?

I'll wait....


But if you can't find it.....lmaooooo....you're gonna look like a dunce.

Find it and post it. Waitinggggg.......

I suggest you go back into your grave, zombie boy.

I would've expected you to be well informed by now. Seems like all that time you've spent dwelling on this topic has been for nothing, it goes to show just how uninformed you truly are.

This link should provide you with the answer you so desperately need. It's directly from the USADA website. You really need to learn how to use Google.

http://www.usada.org/is-it-prohibite...-and-recovery/

There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies

In cases where IV infusions/injections are deemed medically necessary, good medical practice must ensure that: 1) a clear, well-justified diagnosis has been established; 2) no non-prohibited alternative treatment exists;

[Shape up]

Funny, when did you ask me a question, are you thinking of ADP02, are you confused, maybe he was right when he said you were off your meds, so let's look at all of the story, floyd has an IV 2 hours after being checked by a doctor, doctor passes him fit to fight, doesn't mention dehydration, floyd doesn't note on the questionaire that he is dehydrated, it takes 18 days before he applies for a retro tue, conditions state that if there is a therapudic alternative that's not banned it should be used, he didn't drink water, a simple solution, conditions state a home IV needs a tue in advance, his wasn't, we have never been told who authorised the tue, it needs to be a doctor, usada didn't even mention it to NSAC even though they knew the NSAC knocked back pacquaios toradol injection

[travestyny]

i would've expected you to be well informed by now. Seems like all that time you've spent dwelling on this topic has been for nothing, it goes to show just how uninformed you truly are.

This link should provide you with the answer you so desperately need. It's directly from the usada website. You really need to learn how to use google.

http://www.usada.org/is-it-prohibite...-and-recovery/

lmaoooooooo!!!!


You do see the words most commonly there, don't you?


Are you through embarrassing yourself?

[travestyny]

I would've expected you to be well informed by now.

AHEMMM. WADA spokesman, in response to this specific case:

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. However, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight, however.”

There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies

SO UM....DOES "MOST COMMONLY" MEAN NECESSARILY AND ALWAYS IN YOUR LITTLE MUSHED UP MIND? LET ME KNOW, BRO. I know you saw it there, but you're too much of a coward to admit you're wrong.

R.I.P.

ps. I don't even have to use photoshop, bltch.

[travestyny]

Funny, when did you ask me a question, are you thinking of ADP02, are you confused, maybe he was right when he said you were off your meds,

LMAO. You stay owning yourself. You're such a ****ing ******.

Question:

How did the urine come back negative if he was doping? Keep in mind, the labs test for dilution. So what do you think?

Response:

Well I can't throw you in there, you do your favours for free

Repeated Question:

But you didn't answer the question.

If the urine was not diluted according to both the DCO and according to the laboratory, and the urine sample comes back negative, how do you think he is positive for PED's?

Let me know, bro.

LMAO.

so let's look at all of the story, floyd has an IV 2 hours after being checked by a doctor, doctor passes him fit to fight, doesn't mention dehydration, floyd doesn't note on the questionaire that he is dehydrated, it takes 18 days before he applies for a retro tue, conditions state that if there is a therapudic alternative that's not banned it should be used, he didn't drink water, a simple solution, conditions state a home IV needs a tue in advance, his wasn't, we have never been told who authorised the tue, it needs to be a doctor, usada didn't even mention it to NSAC even though they knew the NSAC knocked back pacquaios toradol injection

More bullshlt...over and over...same bullshlt.


1. The ISTUE governs TUE's. You were presented with the facts that prove he did nothing wrong according to the ISTUE. You chose to say the ISTUE is irrelevant. LMAO.

2. Confidentiality laws that existed way before this fight won't allow a simpleton like you or anyone else to know about the doctors, you moron.

3. NSAC has never deemed anyone to be dehydrated. Ever. Did you have a problem with De La Hoya's IV?

4. YOU DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION.

HOW THE **** DID HE USE PED'S WHEN HIS URINE CAME BACK NEGATIVE, AND THE DCO AND THE INDEPENDENT LAB BOTH SEPARATELY TESTED HIS URINE TO MAKE SURE IT WASN'T MASKED BY DILUTION.

LET ME KNOW!

[Shape up]

Where in the ISTUE does it say there must be an emergency for an IV to be given?

I'll wait....


But if you can't find it.....lmaooooo....you're gonna look like a dunce.

Find it and post it. Waitinggggg.......

I suggest you go back into your grave, zombie boy.

Where in the ISTUE does it say if your urine is dark you should have an IV for rehydration ****head