Amazing how they try to **** on Jacobs title, but give GGG credit for defending the same ****ing title....Lacobs ko streak means nothing but GGG's does??? why and how?
Amazing how they try to **** on Jacobs title, but give GGG credit for defending the same ****ing title....Lacobs ko streak means nothing but GGG's does??? why and how?
And Jacobs has beaten cancer. Better KO than anything Golovkin has done.
It is the exact same title GGG gets credit for all his title defenses
I think that if Jacobs ends up becoming "super" champion, either by beating GGG or GGG gets stripped for not fighting him, then all Danny's defences of the WBA world title will be counted as one continous run or reign, as GGG's are now.
It is the exact same title GGG gets credit for all his title defenses
GGG got movedu p to "super" champ or some rubbish, jacobs then won it as a paper belt, plus GGG now has 3 of the 4 available belts. Let's not get too ****** now larry, I know your probably high but lets be real.
How come no one ever brings up the fact that Jacobs was winning that fight before Pirog shifted and caught Jacobs off guard. I think Jacobs learned from that. Jacobs will not be a push over for GGG.
I rewatched the fight recently and I didn't see Jacobs winning?
Tweet
Comment