If golovkin beats brook, where does this rank on his CV?

[b00g13man]

Smh.........

[soul_survivor]

Those would be GGG's top 5 wins??? and he is ranked p4p#3?..wow...you dont see anything wrong here?

I'm not one of those who says ggg has a **** resume (he doesn't) nor am I one who says he has a great one (he doesn't). What he has done however is beat the best middleweights of his time who were all ranked top 10 if not top 5.

The only relevant names missing are Cotto and canelo but is that his fault?

What gets him a very high p4p ranking is that he has obliterated the best his division has to offer without breaking a sweat.

I personally can not name more than 3 fighters on the planet who have a chance to beat him in any p4p, fantasy match up.

[soul_survivor]

Brook is not the #1 Welterweight.
Beating Porter doesn't launch him to the top.

Murray and Macklin are solid fighters,nothing more nothing less.

Former 140lber Cotto beat Geal easier than GGG.

GGG's resume is a cheap gruel made from pigeon droppings and gypsy tears

Brook was ranked number one by just about everyone in boxing, journalist, publication, fans etc. I personally have Bradley there in pacs absence.

In terms of Macklin or Murray, they both arguably beat a decade long middleweight titlist who was top 3 in just about every ranking. What better middleweights could he have beaten at time?

[_Maxi]

That's like trying to rate pieces of shit. It's all shit so what's it matter?

[_Maxi]

Brook was ranked number one by just about everyone in boxing, journalist, publication, fans etc. I personally have Bradley there in pacs absence.

In terms of Macklin or Murray, they both arguably beat a decade long middleweight titlist who was top 3 in just about every ranking. What better middleweights could he have beaten at time?

Macklin arguably beat Martinez you say? or wtf am I reading?

Both knockdows were ****** kd's.. one of those it was martinez tripped over macklin foot. The other was flash or hit behind the head, can't remember now.

Martinez was shot after Chavez jr when he fought murray.

[Larry the boss]

I'm not one of those who says ggg has a **** resume (he doesn't) nor am I one who says he has a great one (he doesn't). What he has done however is beat the best middleweights of his time who were all ranked top 10 if not top 5.

The only relevant names missing are Cotto and canelo but is that his fault?

What gets him a very high p4p ranking is that he has obliterated the best his division has to offer without breaking a sweat.

I personally can not name more than 3 fighters on the planet who have a chance to beat him in any p4p, fantasy match up.

The list you listed had Kell Brook as his 3rd best win......that is embarrassing man

[soul_survivor]

The list you listed had Kell Brook as his 3rd best win......that is embarrassing man

why? you dont think brook is a good fighter?

[soul_survivor]

Macklin arguably beat Martinez you say? or wtf am I reading?

Both knockdows were ****** kd's.. one of those it was martinez tripped over macklin foot. The other was flash or hit behind the head, can't remember now.

Martinez was shot after Chavez jr when he fought murray.

this is what happens when you dont follow boxing

I would explain who I'm talking about but I bet you don't even know who he is so no point.

[bojangles1987]

Macklin arguably beat Martinez you say? or wtf am I reading?

Both knockdows were ****** kd's.. one of those it was martinez tripped over macklin foot. The other was flash or hit behind the head, can't remember now.

Martinez was shot after Chavez jr when he fought murray.

Felix Sturm. Most believe Macklin beat him, there are those who think Murray beat him as well.

[sicko]

Win over Brook does absolutely NOTHING for GGG nor should it