If golovkin beats brook, where does this rank on his CV?

[Madison Boxing]

Brook is not the #1 Welterweight.
Beating Porter doesn't launch him to the top.

Murray and Macklin are solid fighters,nothing more nothing less.

Former 140lber Cotto beat Geal easier than GGG.

GGG's resume is a cheap gruel made from pigeon droppings and gypsy tears

ring magazine says otherwise mate

[Larry the boss]

Which one of the 4 mediocre boxers Ward has beaten in the last 5 years earns him a place in the top 10 pound for pound boxers in the world. GGG recently beat a world champion while Ward fights less than once a year against unranked guys nobody ever heard of. If Ward beats Kovalev he deserves a high ranking but as of right now most boxing places rank GGG in front of him. This now, today, not 7 years ago and the super six tournament.

GGG is ranked ahead of Ward on the Rings list....GGG just beat a world champ who won a vacant damn title...come on man

[Larry the boss]

ring magazine says otherwise mate

What are Brook's top 5 wins

[E-Thug]

ring magazine says otherwise mate

The same Ring Magazine which one time ranked Guerrero P4P 10 and Broner at 6?

[Larry the boss]

great post. As soon as this fight got announced the anti-ggg propaganda machine went straight into action, suddenly brook wasnt even a good fighter at 147 and he only went up in weight because he was running from spence and vargas (yes, they really said hes fighting GGG to avoid vargas) i agree and ive said it before, even if he beats ward he wouldnt get much credit. They would say ward has been inactive and he should have fought him a few years ago.

That part is ****** and whoever said it is a troll....but come on man GGG should get 0 credit for beating Brook..its a **** fight

[Madison Boxing]

What are Brook's top 5 wins

what are the other top welterweights top 5 wins? Yeah pacquiaos are obviously better but what about Porters, thurmans or spences? Garcias wins came at 140. Fact is the most respected magazine had him as number 1

[Madison Boxing]

That part is ****** and whoever said it is a troll....but come on man GGG should get 0 credit for beating Brook..its a **** fight

its not fight of the century but its nowhere near the circus fight people are making it out to be on here.

[Larry the boss]

its not fight of the century but its nowhere near the circus fight people are making it out to be on here.

It really is..the p4p#3 UNIFIED MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPION...is fighting AN UNPROVEN 147 FIGHTER....come on man, its ridiculous

[Larry the boss]

what are the other top welterweights top 5 wins? Yeah pacquiaos are obviously better but what about Porters, thurmans or spences? Garcias wins came at 140. Fact is the most respected magazine had him as number 1

Thats my point...the 147 division has no clear #1 fighter and they have to fight it out to prove the real champ of the division...Thurman-Porter was a nice start..now Manny is back and fighting Vargas..so maybe we will get some clarity..but Brook never proved he was the best fighter at 147

[Madison Boxing]

It really is..the p4p#3 UNIFIED MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPION...is fighting AN UNPROVEN 147 FIGHTER....come on man, its ridiculous

people think im just being some ggg cheerleader but i really dont know why you lot are making it out to be such a crap fight.The size difference really isnt that massive. If GGG's as **** and overrated as you all say he is, why couldnt brook give him real problems?