If golovkin beats brook, where does this rank on his CV?

**Robbie Barrett** · 09-05-2016, 07:59 AM

That's like trying to rate pieces of shit. It's all shit so what's it matter?

**E-Thug** · 09-05-2016, 08:07 AM

Brook's a clown and i say that as an Englishman. I don't see what the rave is about him. His undefeated record isn't impressive, he's only fought one fighter worth a damn and no it isn't better than Murray or Lemieux

**SugarRayCurtain** · 09-05-2016, 08:18 AM

probably a CV good enough to apply at Walmart or Costco, he'd make a good door greeter

**Larry the boss** · 09-05-2016, 08:34 AM

Come on man, if this is one of his best wins that says alot about his resume....trying to hype this mismatch is said...A true fan would call a spade a spade and hope the next fight is better

**soul_survivor** · 09-05-2016, 08:37 AM

Originally posted by bigdramashow

On saturday night gennady golovkin travels to fight highly rated englishman kell brook, in front of his home fans. Kell brook possesses a 36-0 record,was ring magazine number1 welterweight, and has beaten fighters such as porter and senchenko. If golovkin manages to pull this off and ruins brooks impressive undefeated record, where does brook rank on his CV? Is it better than beating lemiuex or murray? Please discuss...

I'd rate GGGs resume as :

Lem (because of the title)
Murray (probably should have had a title)
Brook (no. 1 welterweight before moving up, perfectly acceptable)
Geale (former 2 time mw title holder with a very good resume at the weight)
Macklin (again, probably should have held a belt)

**bojangles1987** · 09-05-2016, 08:38 AM

I highly disagree with the people who will try and argue it is his best win, or anywhere close. Brook is a welterweight with one relevant win. I don't consider that as good as the proven top class middleweights Golovkin has beaten.

If Brook goes on to prove me wrong, then I'll be happy to change that opinion. Right now though, he's not better than beating Macklin, Murray, Geale, or Lemieux, who were all proven middleweights.

**icha** · 09-05-2016, 08:39 AM

Originally posted by bigdramashow

On saturday night gennady golovkin travels to fight highly rated englishman kell brook, in front of his home fans. Kell brook possesses a 36-0 record,was ring magazine number1 welterweight, and has beaten fighters such as porter and senchenko. If golovkin manages to pull this off and ruins brooks impressive undefeated record, where does brook rank on his CV? Is it better than beating lemiuex or murray? Please discuss...

this fight is crap, and will still be considered the best on ggg's resume..

**Madison Boxing** · 09-05-2016, 08:44 AM

Originally posted by soul_survivor

I'd rate GGGs resume as :

Lem (because of the title)
Murray (probably should have had a title)
Brook (no. 1 welterweight before moving up, perfectly acceptable)
Geale (former 2 time mw title holder with a very good resume at the weight)
Macklin (again, probably should have held a belt)

yeah, pretty much how i would rate them.

**Larry the boss** · 09-05-2016, 08:56 AM

Originally posted by soul_survivor

I'd rate GGGs resume as :

Lem (because of the title)
Murray (probably should have had a title)
Brook (no. 1 welterweight before moving up, perfectly acceptable)
Geale (former 2 time mw title holder with a very good resume at the weight)
Macklin (again, probably should have held a belt)

Those would be GGG's top 5 wins??? and he is ranked p4p#3?..wow...you dont see anything wrong here?

If golovkin beats brook, where does this rank on his CV?