Floyd Mayweather Educating ESPN Reporter Bernardo Osuna
Collapse
-
Sometimes to get the real value out off conversation you need to shut off all emotion and just listen to the words , absorb and comprehend .
The words are facts , the interpretation is perceptional .Comment
-
I didn't listen to it my point is Stephen a had come out and said ****** sh it like Floyd can beat you with offense and defense and that is simply not true since the Hoya fight.
Dude is a black athlete fan boy and it's sickening. He is a fawking Uncle Tom yet he tries to come out like he is hood. Fawk that fake azz suckaComment
-
You're preaching to the choir. Look at Trinidad/Mayorga.None of it makes sense because you are not facing it in a boxing ring , do you really think all these fighters are are not wanting to attack Floyd they all just unlucky , he forces them to change and makes them think , during the mental chess match he is pre-empting what they do next , he makes subtle changes of distance and angles where the opponent dont know what to do , Manny was totally controlled in that fight thats why he didnt do anything , just like all the others that were supposed to KO him , they couldnt because he didnt allow them .
Trinidad won that fight because he didn't allow the mind games to throw him. He took risks. He went after Mayorga. He TRIED. Yes, he got clipped a few times, but came out on top for his hard work despite a long layoff. Because he TRIED. That's my point.
Every other opponent besides Manny at least put up a fight over 12 before getting decisioned by TBE, that's all I'm saying.Comment
-
Most of the media prior to the fight (Stephen A. being one exception I can recall) spent the entirety of their "coverage" talking **** about Floyd's personal life, and openly rooting for Pacquiao. Remember some mediocre-looking female media members calling for a boycott because Floyd was a "woman beater"? Those b1tches and the male, openly biased Pacfans (Osuna and co.) were the most salty after seeing the guy they spent so much time demonizing, making their dude look like a complete amateur in the ring. After the fight, they made every excuse in the book against Floyd (it wasn't exciting, he ran, he held, he's supposed to be TBE) and for Pac (his shoulder, he needed a shot, he wore the wrong socks again, maybe it was cramps, he had to use a different barber, etc ;-). To boil it down, its just people being sore losers because the guy they wanted to win got exposed as a fraud.Comment
-
Most of the media prior to the fight (Stephen A. being one exception I can recall) spent the entirety of their "coverage" talking **** about Floyd's personal life, and openly rooting for Pacquiao. Remember some mediocre-looking female media members calling for a boycott because Floyd was a "woman beater"? Those b1tches and the male, openly biased Pacfans (Osuna and co.) were the most salty after seeing the guy they spent so much time demonizing, making their dude look like a complete amateur in the ring. After the fight, they made every excuse in the book against Floyd (it wasn't exciting, he ran, he held, he's supposed to be TBE) and for Pac (his shoulder, he needed a shot, he wore the wrong socks again, maybe it was cramps, he had to use a different barber, etc ;-). To boil it down, its just people being sore losers because the guy they wanted to win got exposed as a fraud.
They went above and beyond in his coverage of talking about his past. It was all tailored nonsense. My whole thing is, you're promoting the fight. Stick to that and deal with it. You as a collective are bashing a man that you will still cover and do it with no problem. Why not rally together and say no we will not cover this match?!? Its simple, to not cover it means you miss out on the biggest fight ever and lose out on millions. FOH with that self righteous bs.Comment
Comment