Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury To Take On UKAD Over Drug Test Results

[kafkod]

Its a Pedvetkin type of move - they violated and are pretending to be the victims for getting caught...now their ****** fanbase will come in and justify the violation...'oh it was only 0.9 nano grams doe ' ' But Fury was thirsty he drank something contaminated'.

Lol. Fuck off you idiot!

[kafkod]

You're living in a dream world son. Bum Squad has glass hands to go with his glass jaw, he won't last long in the sport. Fury rules the division for as long as he wants to. If they had a case against Fury, he'd be banned by now. Innocent until proven guilty b1tch.



Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Sorry mate, but Fury has been found guilty of taking nandrolone and will be banned from boxing and his titles revoked as soon as his appeal has been heard and rejected. It's just a matter of time.

Scott Weiland deduced that logically from a Sunday Mirror headline and a "no comment" statement by UKAD, and there's no arguing with logic like that.

[b00g13man]

What the hell is actually going on here?

[Eff Pandas]

Its a Pedvetkin type of move - they violated and are pretending to be the victims for getting caught...now their ****** fanbase will come in and justify the violation...'oh it was only 0.9 nano grams doe ' ' But Fury was thirsty he drank something contaminated'.

I think the bigger problem is if Fury had a banned substance in his system why was he even allowed to fight Klitschko? Thats the million dollar question for me.

I could give a f#ck what Fury fanboys or Fury haters think with their ****** biased asses either way.

[BoxingFan85]

I think the bigger problem is if Fury had a banned substance in his system why was he even allowed to fight Klitschko? Thats the million dollar question for me.

I could give a f#ck what Fury fanboys or Fury haters think with their ****** biased asses either way.

That's a question worth a million bucks but we don't even have a dime of an answer.. UKAD said nothing, did not agree/disagree.. The so called investigation they are doing in some secret lab of theirs does not yield anything.. If he is not guilty then there isn't even an apology.. The other question I have is, why is it that Fury & his lawyers take so long to hit back at UKAD..
Meanwhile the rematch is in limbo..

[petero]

kafkod denium WTF Huck! LoadedWraps

Whos THE MAN?!!! theres only one legitimate HW champion in the world of professional boxing - THE BRONZE BOMBER BABY! all you haters can suck a d*ck!

This sounds like Elie "swinging on a nut sack" Secbac? Reeeportingg?????

[Eff Pandas]

That's a question worth a million bucks but we don't even have a dime of an answer.. UKAD said nothing, did not agree/disagree.. The so called investigation they are doing in some secret lab of theirs does not yield anything.. If he is not guilty then there isn't even an apology..

Yea I don't get a bunch of stuff with this testing group. We are either trying to stop PED'd up guys from fighting or we aren't. If Fury was cool to fight whats the f#cking problem & if he shouldn't of been fighting why was he fighting? Like I said my biggest questions at this point resolve around this particular knuckleheaded testing group more than Fury.

The other question I have is, why is it that Fury & his lawyers take so long to hit back at UKAD..

I don't see a problem with that. You wanna take your time doing anything legal.

Jon Jones still hasn't sued the NSAC for testing him for something he shouldn't have been tested for, but is still deciding on it from my understanding & he's still within the timeframe to do so for several years I believe.

I'd assume Fury has a similar time frame in the UK, but I don't know that for a fact, either way this IS a quick legal response to legal people. Its only laymen who think you should have a lawsuit pending the day after claims you are dis*****g.

Meanwhile the rematch is in limbo..

Yea that obviously sucks. And does no favors to an aging by the day Klitschko.

[1hourRun]

These idiots are in denial. Its official you morons UKAD and Team Fury have acknowledged it -- Why would a Anti-Doping agency make false accusations about Fury having a steroid in his system? Nandrolone DEAL WITH IT!

[BoxingFan85]

I don't see a problem with that. You wanna take your time doing anything legal.

Jon Jones still hasn't sued the NSAC for testing him for something he shouldn't have been tested for, but is still deciding on it from my understanding & he's still within the timeframe to do so for several years I believe.

I'd assume Fury has a similar time frame in the UK, but I don't know that for a fact, either way this IS a quick legal response to legal people. Its only laymen who think you should have a lawsuit pending the day after claims you are dis*****g.

Actually I find it strange that Fury's team were so slow in reacting.. Look at the guy who genuinely had traces in his system(Povetkin), his team filed a case & in my opinion will be compensated or at least would get a shot again at the title..

A few weeks back Wlad's lawyers & Bernd did meet up with Fury's lawyers & probably would have told them to get their **** sorted with UKAD else there would be consequences..

[BoxingFan85]

What the hell is actually going on here?

"Now, Let me bring you upto speed.. We know nothing.. you are now upto speed.."