Why it's so hard for these refs to warn the excessive hugger is still a mystery to this day. The opponent is virtually fighting two people in the ring. That's why I don't mind rabbit punching as a means of retaliation.
Excessive holding, please clarify what constitutes a foul?
Collapse
-
"Why it's so hard for these refs to warn the excessive hugger is still a mystery to this day. The opponent is virtually fighting two people in the ring. That's why I don't mind rabbit punching as a means of retaliation."
I think it's because holding and clinching are legal to a certain degree. Very subjective, that's why it's problematic and I think there should be more clear rulesComment
-
Because One guy selects his ref and gives him a bonus checkComment
-
Exactly. Too many people salty about TBE domesticating Manny fail to realize that Floyd RARELY held in that fight. They just didn't want him clinching at all so he was at risk of getting knocked out. That's not the way it works. The clinch is a tool to stop momentum. Perfectly legal especially with how infrequently TBE did it against Manny. The reason he did it so much against Maidana was because Maidana is a windmiller; he just throws. I have no issue with it.
I still don't hear people criticizing Grabomir Clinchko for the Povetkin fight. THAT is excessive clinching. Period. It and the Rumble in the Jungle are the two worst offenders, and any other fight pales in comparison to those two.Comment
-
Every time Manny got close Floyd heldExactly. Too many people salty about TBE domesticating Manny fail to realize that Floyd RARELY held in that fight. They just didn't want him clinching at all so he was at risk of getting knocked out. That's not the way it works. The clinch is a tool to stop momentum. Perfectly legal especially with how infrequently TBE did it against Manny. The reason he did it so much against Maidana was because Maidana is a windmiller; he just throws. I have no issue with it.
I still don't hear people criticizing Grabomir Clinchko for the Povetkin fight. THAT is excessive clinching. Period. It and the Rumble in the Jungle are the two worst offenders, and any other fight pales in comparison to those two.Comment
-
Comment
-
What are you talking about? That fight is constantly criticised.Exactly. Too many people salty about TBE domesticating Manny fail to realize that Floyd RARELY held in that fight. They just didn't want him clinching at all so he was at risk of getting knocked out. That's not the way it works. The clinch is a tool to stop momentum. Perfectly legal especially with how infrequently TBE did it against Manny. The reason he did it so much against Maidana was because Maidana is a windmiller; he just throws. I have no issue with it.
I still don't hear people criticizing Grabomir Clinchko for the Povetkin fight. THAT is excessive clinching. Period. It and the Rumble in the Jungle are the two worst offenders, and any other fight pales in comparison to those two.Comment
-
Any solution on how to eliminate this scourge in boxing? Any ideas?
Options:
1. If you happen to be on the ring side throw paper rocks, left over foods, except bottles, or anything that could cause injury.
2. Go on social media and post the picture of the ref everywhere and make him feel like a fugitive. Like they say, go to the root of the problem. Make it specific. Throw the generalities in the garbage.
3. Blame the ref, not the fighter...
4. Start threads like this days before the fight begins or bring it up on social media...
5. What else...Comment
-
Comment
-
it depends on how popular the fighter is. Wlad got away with holding and grabbing because he was the star and and golden boy in the eyes of the german public. Was in no way legal what he did, what was a smaller fighter meant to do when he just grabbed them and leaned on them. Think refs need to be a lot more tough on it because its boring as hell to watch.Comment
Comment