Did Floyd Mayweather use PED's? (simple answer for an OG member please)

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ADP02
    Champ
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 13617
    • 415
    • 1
    • 26,360

    #201
    Originally posted by travestyny
    LMAO. Once again, the TUE protocol was in WADA's ISTUE before this fight was made. That's where you have your problem. Pacquaio's team was the one who had a problem with it, asked for some quirks, and then the contract was sent to Mayweahter, who had no problem with the quirks Pac's team made.

    If they wanted to help him cheat, they would have turned a blind eye to the IV, no? Why would USADA risk it's reputation for Floyd Mayweather when, if they were willing to do that for money, there is a smarter way to do it. Come on...think!

    That is what USADA did. They turned their heads the other way by giving Floyd that RETRO TUE.

    How can a guy who can drink water and whose weight was stable for 30 days need an IV?

    Comment

    • ADP02
      Champ
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2010
      • 13617
      • 415
      • 1
      • 26,360

      #202
      Originally posted by travestyny
      So how you believe this works is that USADA takes a chance and sees if it comes back positive, and then grants the TUE? Because that's damn sure what you said. That's beyond idiotic when they could have just stayed away.

      USADA instead creates a paper trail knowing that they just opened up the floodgates for WADA to investigate due to being alerted by the lab that traces of an IV bag were found. Yep, USADA puts it's head on the block instead of just saying, if you want to cheat, it's on you, but we won't allow ourselves to be proven to be complicit at all.

      You can do better than this, can't you?
      Sorry but that is a lousy excuse.

      AGAIN, look at Lance Armstrong's story. Lance had very highly suspect situations and still got top dogs to help him out.

      Lance's results by the LAB came back positive!!!

      So he got caught with PEDs and they still helped him out. They even allowed a RETROACTIVE prescription!!!

      Comment

      • HeroBando
        I love Mayweather
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2011
        • 17452
        • 236
        • 0
        • 24,430

        #203
        Originally posted by travestyny
        LMAO. Once again, the TUE protocol was in WADA's ISTUE before this fight was made. That's where you have your problem. Pacquaio's team was the one who had a problem with it, asked for some quirks, and then the contract was sent to Mayweahter, who had no problem with the quirks Pac's team made.

        If they wanted to help him cheat, they would have turned a blind eye to the IV, no? Why would USADA risk it's reputation for Floyd Mayweather when, if they were willing to do that for money, there is a smarter way to do it. Come on...think!
        The quirk was contract stating that the fighters could receive Tues without disclosing it to the commission or the other fighter lol.

        Didn't I just say they don't wanna help him cheat? But because they guy is employing them, they're not applying the same standard they would in a supervised setting. That they would even agree to a Tue nondisclosure clause tells you everything you need to know.

        Comment

        • travestyny
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 29107
          • 4,962
          • 9,405
          • 4,074,546

          #204
          Originally posted by ADP02
          Sorry but that is a lousy excuse.

          AGAIN, look at Lance Armstrong's story. Lance had very highly suspect situations and still got top dogs to help him out.

          Lance's results by the LAB came back positive!!!

          So he got caught with PEDs and they still helped him out. They even allowed a RETROACTIVE prescription!!!
          Who helped him out? USADA WAS IN HIS A$$. So how is your Lance bs relevant?

          Comment

          • travestyny
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 29107
            • 4,962
            • 9,405
            • 4,074,546

            #205
            Originally posted by HeroBando
            The quirk was contract stating that the fighters could receive Tues without disclosing it to the commission or the other fighter lol.

            Didn't I just say they don't wanna help him cheat? But because they guy is employing them, they're not applying the same standard they would in a supervised setting. That they would even agree to a Tue nondisclosure clause tells you everything you need to know.
            You are flat out lying. Not on purpose, but because you are misinformed. Everything about the TUE came from WADA's ISTUE that existed before the fight. The ONLY changes that were made were done by Pac's team and accepted by Mayweather. Stop spreading lies and do some research!

            Comment

            • HeroBando
              I love Mayweather
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2011
              • 17452
              • 236
              • 0
              • 24,430

              #206
              Originally posted by travestyny
              You are flat out lying. Not on purpose, but because you are misinformed. Everything about the TUE came from WADA's ISTUE that existed before the fight. The ONLY changes that were made were done by Pac's team and accepted by Mayweather. Stop spreading lies and do some research!
              No, there's a copy of the contract posted that states that the contract supersedes Wada rules and such. So tell me about these changes PACs team forced?

              But its beside the point, as disclosure is a nonissue in real OST, when there's an adversarial relationship between the testers and athlete. Unless you're talking large scale corruption like Rusada. But this is wrong on first principles, athletes hiring testers privately. It's wide open to abuse, who'd expect boxings premier hypocrite to take advantage?

              Comment

              • travestyny
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 29107
                • 4,962
                • 9,405
                • 4,074,546

                #207
                Originally posted by HeroBando
                No, there's a copy of the contract posted that states that the contract supersedes Wada rules and such. So tell me about these changes PACs team forced?

                But its beside the point, as disclosure is a nonissue in real OST, when there's an adversarial relationship between the testers and athlete. Unless you're talking large scale corruption like Rusada. But this is wrong on first principles, athletes hiring testers privately. It's wide open to abuse, who'd expect boxings premier hypocrite to take advantage?
                I've looked at the contract. What you are saying doesn't have anything to do with it when, like I just told you, Pacqiao's team asked for those changes. The language that was put into the contract was AT THE REQUEST OF PAC's team and if not for it, the changes that Pac wanted wouldn't matter. It was accepted by Mayweather's team after that.

                Like I said, you are misinformed.

                Comment

                • HeroBando
                  I love Mayweather
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2011
                  • 17452
                  • 236
                  • 0
                  • 24,430

                  #208
                  Originally posted by travestyny
                  I've looked at the contract. What you are saying doesn't have anything to do with it when, like I just told you, Pacqiao's team asked for those changes. The language that was put into the contract was AT THE REQUEST OF PAC's team and if not for it, the changes that Pac wanted wouldn't matter. It was accepted by Mayweather's team after that.

                  Like I said, you are misinformed.
                  Yeah they asked for any Tues, retroactive or not, to be disclosed to the opponent and commission. Real quirky demand, that. Doubt they meant 3 weeks after the fight, but whatever, it's clear what went down and all your desperate attemps at obfuscation are doomed to fail

                  Comment

                  • hugh grant
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 30103
                    • 2,146
                    • 812
                    • 105,596

                    #209
                    I think he did. That's why he had to be so methodical and calculated about when he fought so he could fit everything around it.

                    Comment

                    • travestyny
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 29107
                      • 4,962
                      • 9,405
                      • 4,074,546

                      #210
                      Originally posted by HeroBando
                      Yeah they asked for any Tues, retroactive or not, to be disclosed to the opponent and commission. Real quirky demand, that. Doubt they meant 3 weeks after the fight, but whatever, it's clear what went down and all your desperate attemps at obfuscation are doomed to fail
                      What you are failing to comprehend, over and over, is that the TUE procedure had nothing to do with Mayweather and everything to do with WADA's rules. Just because you are blinded by hate is no damn excuse. Go look at the ISTUE. This is not rocket science.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP