This fight is seeming less and less likely to ever happen. I'm not holding my breath.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter Eyes Andre Ward - If Both Keep Winning
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostYou should just quit following boxing already, hype man. The Ring title is a f#ckin title! It's the f#ckin lineal title! It's the title that represents lineage of champions. Just because Cotto acquired the lineal title through a CW, that doesn't mean that he didn't acquire the lineal title. The lineal title was on the line, & he won it!...then Canelo won it off of him! That's how a lineal title works! How much more plain can that be?! Are you seriously trying to argue what lineal means?! It's called a "lineal title" for a reason, hype man. Who f#ckin cares what catchweight Cotto or Canelo won the title from?! They won it. Now Canelo has it. And it hasn't been stripped yet. I taught you what the lineal title means, & you're still arguing?? You would never know what a lineal title meant if I didn't teach you. You're just a Ward fanboy looking for any tiny excuse, aren't you? You need to go back & do more work, hype man.
Willie Pep probably won the lineal title at least twice. But I don't have time to go researching all this. My point was clear. Like I said, go back to work hype man.
you are an idiot kid !
1) The Ring is a magazine, NOT a sanctioning body..... they do not mandate, so they cannot sanction..... seriously, how fkn dumb are you?..... The Ring "belt" is just an award, NOT a title.
2) lineage is just the-man-who-beat-the-man..... it is often irrelevant, and the lineal "champ" is often not the best fighter in his division..... a'la Stevenson and Alvarez..... and I also gave you PLENTY of other examples
And what sort of clown would guess at how many lineal titles Pep won?
You don't even know what lineage is you asshat.
you are an idiot kid !
Back when Pep was fighting there was no such thing as a lineal champ, nobody had ever heard the word mentioned..... we did not need a lineal champ, because we had a real champ..... and yet, you taught me all about it, right?
FFS clown, you cannot strip lineage..... the lineal "champ" is the man-who-beat-the-man..... but who cares, because Canelo is the champ of nothing..... he is not even a genuine middleweight.
The Ring can strip Canelo of their middleweight award, but that would simply magnify their incompetence, along with your ******ity..... because the only reason why they ranked him at middleweight - let alone #1 - is because he beat lil 153lb Cotto.....
..... let the record show, The Ring ranked Canelo the #1 middleweight despite the fact that he has never fought above 155, despite the fact that he has never fought a middleweight opponent, and despite the fact that he said this..... "I have no interest in middleweight"
They were dumb, but not surprised to hear that you happily hopped onto the dumb-train with them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostIf i'm the tard, why didn't you know what a lineal title was, huh hype man? Go back to work, hype man.
At least I am not dumb enough to guess how many lineal titles Pep won.
Couldn't you at least have done a little research ?
That "quiz" was a trick-question, dumbass.....
If you had researched, you would either..... not look silly, because you would realize that there was no such thing as a lineal champ back in Pep's day..... or you would actually understand what a lineal "title" is, in which case I would not be required to address your online crying.
You would have seen that it is worthless, and not worth mentioning again.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostAt least I am not dumb enough to guess how many lineal titles Pep won.
Couldn't you at least have done a little research ?
That "quiz" was a trick-question, dumbass.....
If you had researched, you would either..... not look silly, because you would realize that there was no such thing as a lineal champ back in Pep's day..... or you would actually understand what a lineal "title" is, in which case I would not be required to address your online crying.
You would have seen that it is worthless, and not worth mentioning again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postyou are an idiot kid !
1) The Ring is a magazine, NOT a sanctioning body..... they do not mandate, so they cannot sanction..... seriously, how fkn dumb are you?..... The Ring "belt" is just an award, NOT a title.
2) lineage is just the-man-who-beat-the-man..... it is often irrelevant, and the lineal "champ" is often not the best fighter in his division..... a'la Stevenson and Alvarez..... and I also gave you PLENTY of other examples
And what sort of clown would guess at how many lineal titles Pep won?
You don't even know what lineage is you asshat.
you are an idiot kid !
Back when Pep was fighting there was no such thing as a lineal champ, nobody had ever heard the word mentioned..... we did not need a lineal champ, because we had a real champ..... and yet, you taught me all about it, right?
FFS clown, you cannot strip lineage..... the lineal "champ" is the man-who-beat-the-man..... but who cares, because Canelo is the champ of nothing..... he is not even a genuine middleweight.
The Ring can strip Canelo of their middleweight award, but that would simply magnify their incompetence, along with your ******ity..... because the only reason why they ranked him at middleweight - let alone #1 - is because he beat lil 153lb Cotto.....
..... let the record show, The Ring ranked Canelo the #1 middleweight despite the fact that he has never fought above 155, despite the fact that he has never fought a middleweight opponent, and despite the fact that he said this..... "I have no interest in middleweight"
They were dumb, but not surprised to hear that you happily hopped onto the dumb-train with them.
You're trying to argue from opinion ("Hi, my name is aboutfkntime & I say the lineal doesn't matter because it's my opinion that this guy holding the lineal title isn't even the top guy in his division. Lineal titles are irrelevant because only I can determine the best boxer in a division despite there usually being 4 champions per...forget facts & listen to me"). The lineal title is a fact. If you argue against it, you're no boxing fan. Go back to work, hype man.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostI never said that, not once !
LINK, or STFU !
And btw, I did not send you redK because I disagree with you..... I sent you redK because you are OBVIOUSLY just another tard-alt, like JUNIABOY
Oh here is the link to your drivel, you **** spewing cûnt
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...=714287&page=3Last edited by BoxingFan85; 07-26-2016, 12:04 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View PostAgain retorting to name-calling.. I am not an alt you delusional dumbfk.. I have been visiting boxing scene since 2005-2006 but I never registered, just because I joined a few months back you call me an alt!? Great logic Einstein.. You should be a real ****** Mr.Nuthugger.. Keep trolling..
Comment
-
Originally posted by JUNIABOY View PostI call him the hype man because he uses every little trick in the book to get your riled up. No substance. All agenda. He's the hype man who contributes to GGG's hype simply by being antagonistic. His attitude & his anger is a factor for people to become fans of GGG. Isn't that weird?
Like they say any publicity is good publicity. So GGG is getting his fare share from the haters and the credit has to go to them for taking time and effort to talk about a guy they don't like..Last edited by BoxingFan85; 07-26-2016, 12:18 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View PostI agree.. I recon Golovkin haters spend more time talking about him, making threads about him than the actual fans of the guy.. I agree some GGG fans act as fanboys but I think it gets to the point where the haters make threads about those GGG fans..
Like they say any publicity is good publicity. So GGG is getting his fare share from the haters and the credit has to go to them for taking time and effort to talk about a guy they don't like..
Comment
Comment