Yea, I'm not a fan of anybody who comes to the forums just to insult & name-call. This site should be about the boxing. If there's a heated debate, it should be about the boxing. If at any point someone wants to debate the issue but gets angered up, just walk away from the computer. If you strongly disagree with a statement, at least explain why. Aboutfkntime was always about the insults, & posting of memes, or gifs to get his point across...I always thought it was tacky to do that on a forum. Let the truth in your words be heard, & hopefully there's someone who agrees. Leave it at that.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter Eyes Andre Ward - If Both Keep Winning
Collapse
-
OMG, are you still trying to argue that the lineal title is an award? Dude, it's called a lineal title for a reason. There's one in every weight class. Lineal means this is the guy who beat the guy who was the guy before him. It designates lineage of the champion. Are you serious with me having to teach you this?! You need to do a lot more work, hype man.
jeez you're thick..... listen to me, "lineal" is not "The Ring", you halfwit.
They rank by lineage - much to their own detriment - but they do not control/manage/mandate/sanction/approve anything, let alone lineage..... so stop being so ******.
And The Ring " belt "..... which is completely different..... is NOT a title, it is an award..... how many minutes have you been following boxing?
The Ring is just a magazine, now owned by De La Hoya.
And " lineage "..... is just the man who beat the man, the lineal "champ" is often not the best in his division..... as-is the case since Hopkins unified.
Hopkins, the lineal champ, LOST TWICE to Taylor.....
Taylor, the lineal champ, LOST TWICE to Pavlik.....
Pavlik, the lineal champ, LOST to Martinez.....
btw, Martinez, the lineal champ, WOULD HAVE LOST to Golovkin
Martinez, the lineal champ, LOST to Cotto.....
Cotto, the lineal champ, LOST to Canelo.....
(and, he WOULD HAVE ALSO LOST to Golovkin)
Canelo, the lineal champ, was never the best middleweight, because Golovkin was
See how dumb that is ?
You wetting yourself, because Canelo is regarded as the lineal "champ" for beating lil 153lb Cotto..... despite the fact that red has never fought above 155 and has never faced a middleweight opponent..... makes you an extremely dumb kid.
Canelo is NOT a middleweight, you dumb fk...... because you simply cannot get that through your thick head, you have gotten yourself into a right ol state LMAO
spot quiz for ya: how many lineal titles did Willie Pep win?..... and, explain why?
Stop being so ridiculous, Canelo is currently the champ of nothing..... and the only 2 things more over-rated than "lineal"are..... P4P, and casual-fansComment
-
He thinks Andre Ward should be #1 p4p in spite of his inactivity & spineless competition since the super 6.. The only argument he made was that some supports rated him p4p after his comeback fight.. So you know who his fav boxer is.. He made a fuss about the fact that even though I like Ward as a boxer, I did not necessarily agree with him being top 3 p4p now because of inactivity.. So naturally after that he resorted to calling names & the usual DKSAB taunts..
Make no mistake.. he is a fanboy & a pathetic one at it..
Update: Oh yeah, he sent me red k because he disagrees with my opinion & obviously it was a thread on Golovkin.. So he is more than just a fanboy, you see.. Call it having more dimensions to a person..
I never said that, not once !
LINK, or STFU !
And btw, I did not send you redK because I disagree with you..... I sent you redK because you are OBVIOUSLY just another tard-alt, like JUNIABOYComment
-
Golovkin's Promoter Eyes Andre Ward.....
Team Bull**** sure have been shoveling out the tard-food since they announced the Brook debacle
Make sure you spread it nice and evenly guys..... ooops, you missed a bit LMAO
Comment
-
right, so...... despite the fact that you selected an unproven welter.....
..... you would have fought Degale..... AND Andre Ward
wait, let me guess.....
BOTH on the same night, one-after-the-other..... right ?
with one hand tied behind your back..... RIGHT ?LMAO
Comment
-
Right now my fohcus Meedle-wet deeveeshon
Andray is greeeat foighter. Great shampiyun. I respeckt heem
I am ready.
Eeddie Hearns no offer me foight with Andray so I no have to foight with him.
Just....thanks for my promotor. Thanks to HBO. Thanks to Gad.
Welcome to my foight with Kall BrooksComment
-
Yea, I'm not a fan of anybody who comes to the forums just to insult & name-call. This site should be about the boxing. If there's a heated debate, it should be about the boxing. If at any point someone wants to debate the issue but gets angered up, just walk away from the computer. If you strongly disagree with a statement, at least explain why. Aboutfkntime was always about the insults, & posting of memes, or gifs to get his point across...I always thought it was tacky to do that on a forum. Let the truth in your words be heard, & hopefully there's someone who agrees. Leave it at that.
Let's have a better debate!Comment
-
jeez you're thick..... listen to me, "lineal" is not "The Ring", you halfwit.
They rank by lineage - much to their own detriment - but they do not control/manage/mandate/sanction/approve anything, let alone lineage..... so stop being so ******.
And The Ring " belt "..... which is completely different..... is NOT a title, it is an award..... how many minutes have you been following boxing?
The Ring is just a magazine, now owned by De La Hoya.
And " lineage "..... is just the man who beat the man, the lineal "champ" is often not the best in his division..... as-is the case since Hopkins unified.
Hopkins, the lineal champ, LOST TWICE to Taylor.....
Taylor, the lineal champ, LOST TWICE to Pavlik.....
Pavlik, the lineal champ, LOST to Martinez.....
btw, Martinez, the lineal champ, WOULD HAVE LOST to Golovkin
Martinez, the lineal champ, LOST to Cotto.....
Cotto, the lineal champ, LOST to Canelo.....
(and, he WOULD HAVE ALSO LOST to Golovkin)
Canelo, the lineal champ, was never the best middleweight, because Golovkin was
See how dumb that is ?
You wetting yourself, because Canelo is regarded as the lineal "champ" for beating lil 153lb Cotto..... despite the fact that red has never fought above 155 and has never faced a middleweight opponent..... makes you an extremely dumb kid.
Canelo is NOT a middleweight, you dumb fk...... because you simply cannot get that through your thick head, you have gotten yourself into a right ol state LMAO
spot quiz for ya: how many lineal titles did Willie Pep win?..... and, explain why?
Stop being so ridiculous, Canelo is currently the champ of nothing..... and the only 2 things more over-rated than "lineal"are..... P4P, and casual-fans
Willie Pep probably won the lineal title at least twice. But I don't have time to go researching all this. My point was clear. Like I said, go back to work hype man.Comment
-
If i'm the tard, why didn't you know what a lineal title was, huh hype man? Go back to work, hype man.Comment
-
Now you know why I don't ignore trolls. I would prefer this boxing site to be civil & well-informed. Opinions aside, the boxing is what matters. The trolls only care about image. That's why aboutfkntime thinks he's so cool using gif's & insulting guys when he doesn't provide actual counter-arguments. People like that need to be smacked down in the forums for trying to do revisionist history. Just sayin'Comment
Comment