Master Ken Mayweather Pacquiao was BS

[travestyny]

and all these happens only on two of the biggest fight in the history of boxing? and in both times floyd, that tally guy who we will never know, NSAC,vegas, garden who's invovled not su****ious is it not LOL

when floyd's involved nothing is su****ious right? everything is up to par.

tell me, is there anything remotely su****ious at all to you that involves floyd?

TUE, IV, Fight Night weight, red/blue corner fiasco, USADA all these things that somehow only happens to floyd.

I like how you try to spread this **** out. You aren't nearly smart enough to accomplish what you are trying to do.

1. TUE/IV/Fight night weight/USADA are all the same issue. I've gone through it many times. He passed 22 drug tests. The IV wouldn't have masked all of the tests before May 1st, and it wouldn't have masked the blood and urine test on May 2nd. Furthermore, a partial urine sample was given before the IV on May 1st.

2. Red Corner/Blue Corner: The judges have told you who they voted for. Am I wrong? You tried to explain this away by talking about ********, but I proved you wrong. So where do you go from here, because your only possible way to keep this theory up is by stating the judges lied? Fat chance proving that. By the way, check this out:



This is from an app that averages out the rounds given to boxers from users scorecards. This particular one was taken from 1000 users. As you can see, the average for rounds 4 and 6 were in Pac's favor. What does that tell you???

If you were smart, it tells you that the judges had 4 and 6 for the right guy, and your theory is bull****.

Here is the link: http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=191292

And here is another one, just in case you still don't get it:



Taken from 314 users.


It would be hard for you to find a scorecard that did not give Pac rounds 4 and 6, just as all 3 judges did. If your theory was right, it'd mean all 3 judges failed to see what damn near everyone who cared about this fight saw. One judge is on record saying Pac needed a knockout to win in the 12th.

And that concludes your schooling. Good day, sir. You failed and there is no reason to continue. Time for you to throw in the towel.

[Rath]

I like how you try to spread this **** out. You aren't nearly smart enough to accomplish what you are trying to do.

1. TUE/IV/Fight night weight/USADA are all the same issue. I've gone through it many times. He passed 22 drug tests. The IV wouldn't have masked all of the tests before May 1st, and it wouldn't have masked the blood and urine test on May 2nd. Furthermore, a partial urine sample was given before the IV on May 1st.

2. Red Corner/Blue Corner: The judges have told you who they voted for. Am I wrong? You tried to explain this away by talking about ********, but I proved you wrong. So where do you go from here, because your only possible way to keep this theory up is by stating the judges lied? Fat chance proving that. By the way, check this out:



This is from an app that averages out the rounds given to boxers from users scorecards. This particular one was taken from 1000 users. As you can see, the average for rounds 4 and 6 were in Pac's favor. What does that tell you???

If you were smart, it tells you that the judges had 4 and 6 for the right guy, and your theory is bull****.

Here is the link: http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=191292

And here is another one, just in case you still don't get it:



Taken from 314 users.


It would be hard for you to find a scorecard that did not give Pac rounds 4 and 6, just as all 3 judges did. If your theory was right, it'd mean all 3 judges failed to see what damn near everyone who cared about this fight saw. One judge is on record saying Pac needed a knockout to win in the 12th.

And that concludes your schooling. Good day, sir. You failed and there is no reason to continue. Time for you to throw in the towel.

in short floyd does not do anything su****ious at all, right? squeaky clean.


where did this guy base his remark "floyd win unanimously" ?

if a man who knows where and which fighter is on blue/red corner, is presented by a blank remark slot and was asked to fill in the blank using only the info right there in the final score sheet what do you think he will write on that blank remark slot?

[Hype job]

Spoon. Seriously. I agree it was closer than most had it and that Pac didn't get enough credit for what he did but you have to stop this.

[travestyny]

in short floyd does not do anything su****ious at all, right? squeaky clean.


where did this guy base his remark "floyd win unanimously" ?

if a man who knows where and which fighter is on blue/red corner, is presented by a blank remark slot and was asked to fill in the blank using only the info right there in the final score sheet what do you think he will write on that blank remark slot?

Dude, ****ing stop already. Your issue is about who the judges decided won.

THE JUDGES HAVE TOLD YOU WHO THEY DECIDED WON. I GAVE YOU THE DIRECT QUOTATIONS FROM THE JUDGES MOUTHS. WHAT ELSE DO YOU NEED???

[Rath]

Dude, ****ing stop already. Your issue is about who the judges decided won.

THE JUDGES HAVE TOLD YOU WHO THEY DECIDED WON. I GAVE YOU THE DIRECT QUOTATIONS FROM THE JUDGES MOUTHS. WHAT ELSE DO YOU NEED???

can't answer the question can you LOL

where did this tally guy whoever he is based his remark :floyd won unanimously" ?

if a man is presented with the final score card and he knows which fighter belongs to what corner, what will he write on the blank remark slot?

fighter A - Red

Fighter B - Blue

judge X : Red 116 - Blue 112

Judge Y : Red 116 - Blue 112

Judge Z : Red 115 - Blue 113

Fighter ____ won unanimously

now fill in the blank simple is it not

[travestyny]

can't answer the question can you LOL

where did this tally guy whoever he is based his remark :floyd won unanimously" ?

if a man is presented with the final score card and he knows which fighter belongs to what corner, what will he write on the blank remark slot?

fighter A - Red

Fighter B - Blue

judge X : Red 116 - Blue 112

Judge Y : Red 116 - Blue 112

Judge Z : Red 115 - Blue 113

Fighter ____ won unanimously

now fill in the blank simple is it not

This is not a rhetorical question. I really want you to answer this question:

ARE YOU ******ED????

You believe the judges decided that Pacquiao should be the winner, correct?

Why don't the judges agree with you? This is very simple. You don't have to worry about corners. WHAT DO THE DAMN JUDGES SAY?

[Rath]

This is not a rhetorical question. I really want you to answer this question:

ARE YOU ******ED????

You believe the judges decided that Pacquiao should be the winner, correct?

Why don't the judges agree with you? This is very simple. You don't have to worry about corners. WHAT DO THE DAMN JUDGES SAY?

answer the question where did this tally guy based his remark "floyd won unanimously' ?

i am sure he watch the fight

how did he not know which corner floyd was at?

remember that the color was not pre printed on the form

he was the one who wrote those

why would he wrote red under floyd's name and blue under pac's?

if your reason was he made a mistake becuase the red was under floyd's name.

he was the one who wrote and assigned red color under floyd's name was he not?

[travestyny]

answer the question where did this tally guy based his remark "floyd won unanimously' ?

I answered your question the last time you told me to answer it, you bumbling idiot. Why are you asking me to answer it again?????

No one is arguing that he didn't make a mistake putting the names under the wrong color. The whole point you are trying to make is that the judges really scored it for Pacquaio, right?

THEN WHY ARE THE JUDGES TELLING YOU THEY DIDN'T???????? GOD, YOU ARE THE BIGGEST IDIOT HERE BY FAR!

[Rath]

I answered your question the last time you told me to answer it, you bumbling idiot. Why are you asking me to answer it again?????

No one is arguing that he didn't make a mistake putting the names under the wrong color. The whole point you are trying to make is that the judges really scored it for Pacquaio, right?

THEN WHY ARE THE JUDGES TELLING YOU THEY DIDN'T???????? GOD, YOU ARE THE BIGGEST IDIOT HERE BY FAR!

i am sure he watch the fight

how did he not know which corner floyd was at?

remember that the color was not pre printed on the form

he was the one who wrote those

why would he wrote red under floyd's name and blue under pac's?

if your reason was he made a mistake becuase the red was under floyd's name.

he was the one who wrote and assigned red color under floyd's name was he not?

well?

[travestyny]

i am sure he watch the fight

how did he not know which corner floyd was at?

remember that the color was not pre printed on the form

he was the one who wrote those

why would he wrote red under floyd's name and blue under pac's?

if your reason was he made a mistake becuase the red was under floyd's name.

he was the one who wrote and assigned red color under floyd's name was he not?

well?

You really are ******ed. I answered your question already. Why are you now ducking my question. What about the judges telling you that they scored it for Mayweather. What about Feldman saying Pacquaio needed a knockout in the 12th. How does your conspiracy theory reconcile that? Are you going to answer or not?