I have never ducked one of your questions. I'm not even sure what you are asking me.
Are you asking where the guy who transferred the scores onto the final scoresheet got his information from?
Let me make it clear.
answer: He got the scores from the judges. who's asking where he got the scores?
He tallied them in the wrong corner,[/B False, he of all people knows that the corner color under the name does not corresponds to which corner color the boxer was at (the name above was the title/billing of the fight who's name should come first you even agreed to this). he's been doing that for so many years already.
] but he obviously kept the scores consistent, What was consistent was his mistakes,he made mistakes 144 times (72 for dela hoys vs floyd and 72 for pac vs floyd) what baffles me was that he was doing it manually and never realized once that he was making those mistakes not once in 144 times?
meaning Mayweather's scores were under his name, Pacquiao's/Dela Hoya's scores were under their names. No one has ever denied that he made a mistake and tallied them under the wrong color. [/B]how can anyone denied that? it's documented and it's a fact. you can consider him making mistake on delahoys vs floyd, but doing it exactly the same again on pac vs floyd can no longer be considered a "mistake". the guy who's working for NSAC for so many years for hundreds and hundreds of bouts making the same mistake on two of the biggest fight in boxing history and both mistakes favored one boxer named floyd, is no longer a mistake.
may i remind you again that the corner color was not pre printed with the form it was handwritten it was that guy who wrote where red and blue corner should be.. and if you remember that time stamped on the left side of the form it clearly show that it was printed (as you said) way after the fight has begun. in fact in pac vs floyd case it was printed in the 11th round of the fight. by then he already watched 11 rounds of that fight, and still don't know which corner each fighter belongs to?
Now, will you answer my question? Let me make this clear. If you believe that Pacquiao won rounds 4 and 6, this means that your conspiracy theory is bull****. You know that right?
whether i believe pac won or lost those two rounds you mentioned is irrelevant. i have hundreds of rounds that i thought a boxer won but judges saw it differently.
are those fights which everyone considered a robbery, where in judges scored the bout for boxer A when everybody saw that boxer b won everybody were wrong?
for argument sake i was right when i said pac won those two rounds in my judgement and they were consistent with what the judges saw, would you also consider i was right and the judges wrong for those rounds that i judged pac won but were inconsistent with what the judges saw? or i am only right on those two rounds which was consistent with what the judges saw?
how's my point bull**** now LOL
[/COLOR][/COLOR][/B]
i have answered this question long before in that other thread.
I've answered your question, if that's the question you were indeed asking. Now answer mine. Ok?
Are you asking where the guy who transferred the scores onto the final scoresheet got his information from?
Let me make it clear.
answer: He got the scores from the judges. who's asking where he got the scores?
He tallied them in the wrong corner,[/B False, he of all people knows that the corner color under the name does not corresponds to which corner color the boxer was at (the name above was the title/billing of the fight who's name should come first you even agreed to this). he's been doing that for so many years already.
] but he obviously kept the scores consistent, What was consistent was his mistakes,he made mistakes 144 times (72 for dela hoys vs floyd and 72 for pac vs floyd) what baffles me was that he was doing it manually and never realized once that he was making those mistakes not once in 144 times?
meaning Mayweather's scores were under his name, Pacquiao's/Dela Hoya's scores were under their names. No one has ever denied that he made a mistake and tallied them under the wrong color. [/B]how can anyone denied that? it's documented and it's a fact. you can consider him making mistake on delahoys vs floyd, but doing it exactly the same again on pac vs floyd can no longer be considered a "mistake". the guy who's working for NSAC for so many years for hundreds and hundreds of bouts making the same mistake on two of the biggest fight in boxing history and both mistakes favored one boxer named floyd, is no longer a mistake.
may i remind you again that the corner color was not pre printed with the form it was handwritten it was that guy who wrote where red and blue corner should be.. and if you remember that time stamped on the left side of the form it clearly show that it was printed (as you said) way after the fight has begun. in fact in pac vs floyd case it was printed in the 11th round of the fight. by then he already watched 11 rounds of that fight, and still don't know which corner each fighter belongs to?
Now, will you answer my question? Let me make this clear. If you believe that Pacquiao won rounds 4 and 6, this means that your conspiracy theory is bull****. You know that right?
whether i believe pac won or lost those two rounds you mentioned is irrelevant. i have hundreds of rounds that i thought a boxer won but judges saw it differently.
are those fights which everyone considered a robbery, where in judges scored the bout for boxer A when everybody saw that boxer b won everybody were wrong?
for argument sake i was right when i said pac won those two rounds in my judgement and they were consistent with what the judges saw, would you also consider i was right and the judges wrong for those rounds that i judged pac won but were inconsistent with what the judges saw? or i am only right on those two rounds which was consistent with what the judges saw?
how's my point bull**** now LOL
[/COLOR][/COLOR][/B]
i have answered this question long before in that other thread.
I've answered your question, if that's the question you were indeed asking. Now answer mine. Ok?
spin this genius floyd fan


Comment