Master Ken Mayweather Pacquiao was BS

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rath
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2014
    • 7081
    • 161
    • 155
    • 13,464

    #81
    Originally posted by travestyny
    I have never ducked one of your questions. I'm not even sure what you are asking me.

    Are you asking where the guy who transferred the scores onto the final scoresheet got his information from?

    Let me make it clear.

    answer: He got the scores from the judges. who's asking where he got the scores?

    He tallied them in the wrong corner,[/B False, he of all people knows that the corner color under the name does not corresponds to which corner color the boxer was at (the name above was the title/billing of the fight who's name should come first you even agreed to this). he's been doing that for so many years already.

    ] but he obviously kept the scores consistent, What was consistent was his mistakes,he made mistakes 144 times (72 for dela hoys vs floyd and 72 for pac vs floyd) what baffles me was that he was doing it manually and never realized once that he was making those mistakes not once in 144 times?

    meaning Mayweather's scores were under his name, Pacquiao's/Dela Hoya's scores were under their names. No one has ever denied that he made a mistake and tallied them under the wrong color. [/B]how can anyone denied that? it's documented and it's a fact. you can consider him making mistake on delahoys vs floyd, but doing it exactly the same again on pac vs floyd can no longer be considered a "mistake". the guy who's working for NSAC for so many years for hundreds and hundreds of bouts making the same mistake on two of the biggest fight in boxing history and both mistakes favored one boxer named floyd, is no longer a mistake.


    may i remind you again that the corner color was not pre printed with the form it was handwritten it was that guy who wrote where red and blue corner should be.. and if you remember that time stamped on the left side of the form it clearly show that it was printed (as you said) way after the fight has begun. in fact in pac vs floyd case it was printed in the 11th round of the fight. by then he already watched 11 rounds of that fight, and still don't know which corner each fighter belongs to?


    Now, will you answer my question? Let me make this clear. If you believe that Pacquiao won rounds 4 and 6, this means that your conspiracy theory is bull****. You know that right?


    whether i believe pac won or lost those two rounds you mentioned is irrelevant. i have hundreds of rounds that i thought a boxer won but judges saw it differently.

    are those fights which everyone considered a robbery, where in judges scored the bout for boxer A when everybody saw that boxer b won everybody were wrong?

    for argument sake i was right when i said pac won those two rounds in my judgement and they were consistent with what the judges saw, would you also consider i was right and the judges wrong for those rounds that i judged pac won but were inconsistent with what the judges saw? or i am only right on those two rounds which was consistent with what the judges saw?

    how's my point bull**** now LOL

    [/COLOR][/COLOR][/B]
    i have answered this question long before in that other thread.

    I've answered your question, if that's the question you were indeed asking. Now answer mine. Ok?

    spin this genius floyd fan
    Last edited by Rath; 07-17-2016, 08:27 AM.

    Comment

    • travestyny
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 29106
      • 4,962
      • 9,405
      • 4,074,546

      #82
      Originally posted by Rath
      spin this genius floyd fan
      There is nothing to spin. You agree that Mayweather lost round 4 and 6. All 3 judges agreed he lost rounds 4 and 6. Everyone knows it.

      Now if that is the case, how does your conspiracy theory make sense?

      Let me remind you that Feldman broke down most of the rounds of the fight. You have a judge stating what happened round after round. Do I need to send that to you once again?

      How is it possible for a judge to tell you exactly what he saw in the rounds, and you still believe this theory?

      "But in the fourth round Pacquiao got him on the ropes. I know Mayweather has great defense, but he did take some shots there."

      It was after Round 4 that Feldman said to himself, "We have a fight!"

      Mayweather took Round 5.

      "Then I'm thinking after Round 6, Pacquiao has taken two of the last three and it's going to get really tight," Feldman said.


      Be honest. Feldman is agreeing with you, and agreeing with most of us. Pacquiao took at least 2 of the 3 rounds when considering rounds 4, 5, and 6.

      So again, how does your theory possibly make any sense?

      Be honest. This completely ruins your conspiracy theory. Be a ****ing man and admit the theory is bull****.

      Comment

      • Rath
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2014
        • 7081
        • 161
        • 155
        • 13,464

        #83
        Originally posted by travestyny
        There is nothing to spin. You agree that Mayweather lost round 4 and 6. All 3 judges agreed he lost rounds 4 and 6. Everyone knows it.

        Now if that is the case, how does your conspiracy theory make sense?

        Let me remind you that Feldman broke down most of the rounds of the fight. You have a judge stating what happened round after round. Do I need to send that to you once again?

        How is it possible for a judge to tell you exactly what he saw in the rounds, and you still believe this theory?

        "But in the fourth round Pacquiao got him on the ropes. I know Mayweather has great defense, but he did take some shots there."

        It was after Round 4 that Feldman said to himself, "We have a fight!"

        Mayweather took Round 5.

        "Then I'm thinking after Round 6, Pacquiao has taken two of the last three and it's going to get really tight," Feldman said.


        Be honest. Feldman is agreeing with you, and agreeing with most of us. Pacquiao took at least 2 of the 3 rounds when considering rounds 4, 5, and 6.

        So again, how does your theory possibly make any sense?

        Be honest. This completely ruins your conspiracy theory. Be a ****ing man and admit the theory is bull****.

        i got tons of evidence pointing to a planned mistake you only got 2 rounds

        then which round are you going to use in oscar vs floyd's case, all of them? lol

        and yet again still evading how the guy made mistakes about the corner he was doing for years and only twice incidentally on two of the biggest fight in boxing history.

        oh how come all three judges scored the fight 8 rounds identically the same in a not lopsided match where some rounds says it could go either way

        how do you justify those rounds that the judges gave to floyd when the slow mo says otherwise?

        told you your argument ability is sickening, intentionally leaving out important matters, try to ignore them days on end and then come back arguing it again.

        i said for argument sake.

        you told me i was right if i agree that pac won those two rounds because it agrees with the judges score.

        i then ask you would i still be right on those rounds that i see pac won but does not agree with what the judges saw?

        talk about genius floyd fans logic lol

        your argument is weak, base entirely on those two rounds,

        feldman says pac pinned floyd on the rope = pac won that round (as if all the rounds that pac pinned floyd to the ropes pac won those rounds) lol

        feldman says he got a few shots in there = pac won that round (as if all the rounds that pac got a few shots in there pac won those rounds) lol

        now you know why your rep never gets greened.

        cussing, insulting that comes back right at your face.
        Last edited by Rath; 07-17-2016, 03:35 PM.

        Comment

        • travestyny
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 29106
          • 4,962
          • 9,405
          • 4,074,546

          #84
          Originally posted by Rath
          i got tons of evidence pointing to a planned mistake you only got 2 rounds

          then which round are you going to use in oscar vs floyd's case, all of them? lol

          and yet again still evading how the guy made mistakes about the corner he was doing for years and only twice incidentally on two of the biggest fight in boxing history.

          oh how come all three judges scored the fight 8 rounds identically the same in a not lopsided match where some rounds says it could go either way

          how do you justify those rounds that the judges gave to floyd when the slow mo says otherwise?

          told you your argument ability is sickening, intentionally leaving out important matters, try to ignore them days on end and then come back arguing it again.

          i said for argument sake.

          you told me i was right if i agree that pac won those two rounds because it agrees with the judges score.

          i then ask you would i still be right on those rounds that i see pac won but does not agree with what the judges saw?

          talk about genius floyd fans logic lol

          your argument is weak, base entirely on those two rounds,

          feldman says pac pinned floyd on the rope = pac won that round (as if all the rounds that pac pinned floyd to the ropes pac won those rounds) lol

          feldman says he got a few shots in there = pac won that round (as if all the rounds that pac got a few shots in there pac won those rounds) lol

          now you know why your rep never gets greened.

          cussing, insulting that comes back right at your face.
          You are an absolute moron. THE JUDGE DETAILED WHY HE GAVE THE ROUNDS TO PACQUIAO. THEREFORE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE SCORES WERE SWAPPED IF HE SAYS WHY HE GAVE ROUNDS 4 AND 6 TO PACQUIAO. Even you seem to admit that when you say "then what about the Dela Hoya Fight."

          And that is easy too....BECAUSE THE JUDGE FOR THAT FIGHT THAT GAVE IT TO MAYWEATHER STATES THAT HE GAVE IT TO MAYWEATHER.

          Not only that, but:

          RICHARD SHAEFFER LOOKED INTO IT, AND SAID HE WAS SATISFIED THAT THE SCORES WERE LEGIT FOR MAYWEATHER. You tried to spin this and say he was more on Floyd's side when a) He was Dela Hoya's business partner and b) He wouldn't look into it at all if he were on Mayweather's side, now would he? This is common sense, which you are lacking severely.

          You have to write a whole essay on this when it has been cleared up straight from the judges mouths. If you think the judges didn't really score it for Mayweather, common sense tells you to go to the judges. The judges said they did. You have no case, moron. Don't you ever wonder whey even your butt buddies Spoon and ADP02 have never cosigned on this issue? It's because they are not as ****** as you are! Do you ever wonder why you were massacred on this in your thread about it? Because it's common sense that it's bull****, fool. Get over it.

          Comment

          • Spoon23
            INVINCIBLE
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 20624
            • 922
            • 904
            • 107,969

            #85
            Originally posted by b00g13man
            Lol that man is agreeing he got knocked the fuvk out by raising his hand to the ref hahaha

            Like how master Ken agrees that hugging to stop an Asian guy is not a master class move hahaha

            Comment

            • Rath
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2014
              • 7081
              • 161
              • 155
              • 13,464

              #86
              Originally posted by travestyny
              You are an absolute moron. THE JUDGE DETAILED WHY HE GAVE THE ROUNDS TO PACQUIAO. THEREFORE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE SCORES WERE SWAPPED IF HE SAYS WHY HE GAVE ROUNDS 4 AND 6 TO PACQUIAO. Even you seem to admit that when you say "then what about the Dela Hoya Fight."

              And that is easy too....BECAUSE THE JUDGE FOR THAT FIGHT THAT GAVE IT TO MAYWEATHER STATES THAT HE GAVE IT TO MAYWEATHER.

              Not only that, but:

              RICHARD SHAEFFER LOOKED INTO IT, AND SAID HE WAS SATISFIED THAT THE SCORES WERE LEGIT FOR MAYWEATHER. You tried to spin this and say he was more on Floyd's side when a) He was Dela Hoya's business partner and b) He wouldn't look into it at all if he were on Mayweather's side, now would he? This is common sense, which you are lacking severely.

              You have to write a whole essay on this when it has been cleared up straight from the judges mouths. If you think the judges didn't really score it for Mayweather, common sense tells you to go to the judges. The judges said they did. You have no case, moron. Don't you ever wonder whey even your butt buddies Spoon and ADP02 have never cosigned on this issue? It's because they are not as ****** as you are! Do you ever wonder why you were massacred on this in your thread about it? Because it's common sense that it's bull****, fool. Get over it.
              and all these happens only on two of the biggest fight in the history of boxing? and in both times floyd, that tally guy who we will never know, NSAC,vegas, garden who's invovled not su****ious is it not LOL

              when floyd's involved nothing is su****ious right? everything is up to par.

              tell me, is there anything remotely su****ious at all to you that involves floyd?

              TUE, IV, Fight Night weight, red/blue corner fiasco, USADA all these things that somehow only happens to floyd.

              Comment

              • tangalog2200
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2011
                • 3323
                • 81
                • 0
                • 13,904

                #87
                Originally posted by Spoon23
                Master Ken: The only way to stop an Asian guy is to hug him

                wow! spoon, you better be really ready for lightning, thunderstorms and the kitchen sink...ha ha ha ha....

                Comment

                • Spoon23
                  INVINCIBLE
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 20624
                  • 922
                  • 904
                  • 107,969

                  #88
                  Originally posted by tangalog2200
                  wow! spoon, you better be really ready for lightning, thunderstorms and the kitchen sink...ha ha ha ha....
                  I've been ready since the time Fl0mos infested and roamed this world. As you can see in this thread, they have come out like rodents trying to save face for their fraud hero's embarrassing showing hahaha

                  I smell blood hahaha

                  Last edited by Spoon23; 07-18-2016, 02:00 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Lester Tutor
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2015
                    • 17673
                    • 365
                    • 253
                    • 22,224

                    #89

                    Comment

                    • Spoon23
                      INVINCIBLE
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 20624
                      • 922
                      • 904
                      • 107,969

                      #90
                      Originally posted by SugarKaineHook
                      How desperate are you and your kind to go off topic to a non serious thread were it is only meant to find humor and laughter.

                      The fact you posted this video shows how deeply hurt you are Zaroku, I guess you know that in any joke there is truth in it.

                      You have shown your pain by bringing this out. You have been truly affected by master Ken's opinion. Be that as it may, we can be glad knowing Floyd's last fight with Berto was a spectacular one, and he has brought us something to remember him by. We should be much appreciative of Floyd's efforts.

                      Cheers!

                      # I leave you with ADP02 serious findings about Victor Conte's opinion about Froid.

                      “I don’t get it,” Conte says. “There are strict criteria for the granting of a TUE. You don’t hand them out like Halloween candy. And this sort of IV use is clearly against the rules.

                      Also, from a medical point of view, if they’re administering what they said they did, it doesn’t make sense to me. There are more effective ways to rehydrate. If you drank ice-cold Celtic seawater, you’d have far greater benefits. It’s very su****ious to me. I can tell you that IV drugs clear an athlete’s system more quickly than drugs that are administered by subcutaneous injection. So why did USADA make this decision? Why did they grant something that’s prohibited?

                      In my view, that’s something federal law enforcement officials should be asking Travis Tygart.” - Victor Conte

                      Why does Floyd have a low TE ratio.. A fact that is hard to cover up. Tsk tsk tsk..


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP