Why is Broner criticized yet GGG praised?

[New England]

Broner is a clown and classless street thug whereas Golovkin is a dedicated champion and carries himself with class and self respect. The chimpanzee Broner could learn a thing or two from a real man like GGG.

chimpanzee...?

[New England]

golovkin's got a better resume and he's a better p4p fighter. broner's fought better competition p4p, but he lost his two biggest fights. his best wins are demarco and malignaggi. and the fight with paulie was close



if you praise those wins, and crap on golovkin's, you're just a fanboy. nothing i can do about it. that doesn't mean golovkin's got an amazing resume. just means you're a fanboy if you crap on one while praising the other.

[therealpugilist]

You call yourself a die hard fan but you're obviously a Floyd groupie.

And he's being critisized by Floyd groupies.

Every real die hard fan knows he has been openly ducked, and this is the main reason why he doesn't have names like Cotto, Martinez or Alvarez on his resume.

Because they openly ducked him, vacating a belt as the last exemple.

yea im a groupie because I state facts...get out of your feelings and smell the roses....GGG is overhyped, is unproven and many of you are butthurt Mayweather hasnt took an L....GGG could learn a lot of mayweather.....When mayweather couldnt get the fights he wanted, he took control of his own career and got all the fights he wanted....ODLH, PAC, Cotto, Mosley, all the guys people claimed he ducked or feared.

Mayweather also has won all his titles in the ring...earned it the hard way...deal with the truth

[Mr. Philadel]

he's brash and ****y and no matter what his critics say, the kid can fight...he got heart as well..AB has had a more success as a pro than Lil G imo

[BillyBoxing]

And when did Broner lose to those guys at 135???? Oh wait he lost two weights up right? So we can wait until GGG goes to 175 to compare

Schooled AB? Wow you pathetic fanboy. Broner had Paulie on bambi legs more times than I can count in that fight, You know punches on the guard aren't scoring punches right?

Maidana and Paulie have been 140 pounders themselves.
Broner outgrew 130 and 135.
And Broner wasn't great either at 130/135 getting ass kicked by Ponce.

Broner is a hyped copy of Mayweather.

He's nothing at 147, even Porter isn't the top WW (lost to Brook and Thurm).

So if GGG moves up to 175 and lose to Chilemba, then he can get praised like Broner I guess...

He won his 147 title vs Paulie, and yes, was schooled in many rounds by a man who can't punch.
Paulie showed better boxing skills than AB.

GGG earned the hype being a 2 time amateur world champ (sr/jr) and an olympic finalist, not mimicking another fighter.

Broner could be better if he wasn't dumb and so obsessed with his own ego.

Not a fan boy but you being a deluded hater.
You're more hating on GGG and denying his abilities.

I read you're picking Brook, hope you won't hide once Brook get beat from pillar to post you "boxing sofa expert".

[jmrf4435]

Broner is a scum bag?

[BillyBoxing]

yea im a groupie because I state facts...get out of your feelings and smell the roses....GGG is overhyped, is unproven and many of you are butthurt Mayweather hasnt took an L....GGG could learn a lot of mayweather.....When mayweather couldnt get the fights he wanted, he took control of his own career and got all the fights he wanted....ODLH, PAC, Cotto, Mosley, all the guys people claimed he ducked or feared.

Mayweather also has won all his titles in the ring...earned it the hard way...deal with the truth

You're a groupie because you only state negative facts when it comes to GGG and positive facts when it comes to your heroe.

ODLH, PAC, COTTO, MOSLEY, be honnest, he fought them out of their prime, and that's what people dislike about him, all the greats he fought where past it.
Maybe be not his fault and I know, he wasn't spring chicken himself.

But we can critisize it, just like you can critisize GGG for fighting Wade instead of Nelo, Monroe Jr instead of Cotto, Proska instead of Martinez.

But again, is it his own fault...seems like only May jr get a pass.

Saying a unified champion, decorated amateur champion is an unproven, overhyped fighter is ******ed.
He needs big name to enter the HOF but he's not an unproven fighter.
Spence Jr is an unproven fighter.

Floyd is by your logic unproven as an ATG since he never beat an ATG close to his prime...

[PivotandRoll]

Maidana and Paulie have been 140 pounders themselves.
Broner outgrew 130 and 135.
And Broner wasn't great either at 130/135 getting ass kicked by Ponce.

Broner is a hyped copy of Mayweather.

He's nothing at 147, even Porter isn't the top WW (lost to Brook and Thurm).

So if GGG moves up to 175 and lose to Chilemba, then he can get praised like Broner I guess...

He won his 147 title vs Paulie, and yes, was schooled in many rounds by a man who can't punch.
Paulie showed better boxing skills than AB.

GGG earned the hype being a 2 time amateur world champ (sr/jr) and an olympic finalist, not mimicking another fighter.

Broner could be better if he wasn't dumb and so obsessed with his own ego.

Not a fan boy but you being a deluded hater.
You're more hating on GGG and denying his abilities.

I read you're picking Brook, hope you won't hide once Brook get beat from pillar to post you "boxing sofa expert".

Who's better Paulie Malignaggi or a shot Kasim Ouma?

And another lie, Broner outgrew 135? Really because I remember Burns and everyone ducking him and him moving up for the big fights.

Won't hide from what? You touting your heros great win against a WW?

I don't hate GGG, YOU love him like a little groupie. His best win is Martin Murray, Slice that what ever way you want.

Broner made Molina look terrible and he beat Provodnikov easy and took Lucas to hell. But yet you write it off right?

I think Broner and GGG are about the same level. One has fought great fighters, the other hasn't.

I'm not denying his abilities. I'm aware of them and don't make up pretend ones. He slowly stalks after his opponents in the tiny rings they put him in, he pins them very well against the ropes. He has a strong one speed jab that he throws with a glove up to catch the opponents Jab. He has great use of his shoulders when punching and good accuracy.

That's about it, He doesn't consistently change levels or move his head. He certainly won't stand with them in the pocket. You guys are liars because he hates trading punches and backs up straight out with his hands wide pen after being hit.

He has the great equalizer of his power and it's become a myth to the point of Floyd's defense, in the way it affects the opponent before they ever experience it, that is a great compliment to him. Remember Broner is on the same +- list as GGG.

You love GGG and Hate Broner...Why can't you just admit that.

Oh and P.S I think GGG has avoided Lara for the very reason he would look like Broner against Paulie.

[BillyBoxing]

Who's better Paulie Malignaggi or a shot Kasim Ouma? .

Who cares?
About the same level.
I rate Paulie at best as a B- fighter (Hatton and Kahn ruined him and they barely are A fighters), Ouma was a C+ fighter, not far from Paulie level tough.

Ouma was tough and to GGG's credit, he was the first man to stop him.

The good thing about Paulie is he's a durable guy who can come back from hard beatings, most fighters can't.

And another lie, Broner outgrew 135? Really because I remember Burns and everyone ducking him and him moving up for the big fights.
.

LOL, where is the lie? A lie because it doesn't fit your agenda?

He was 21 when he fought Ponce, he obviously been growing up since.
Do you think he could still make 135?Let alone 130?

Won't hide from what? You touting your heros great win against a WW?

I don't hate GGG, YOU love him like a little groupie. His best win is Martin Murray, Slice that what ever way you want.
.

You don't hate GGG but you're obviously coming in everythread related to him shtting on him.

Broner made Molina look terrible and he beat Provodnikov easy and took Lucas to hell. But yet you write it off right?

I think Broner and GGG are about the same level. One has fought great fighters, the other hasn't.
.

Molina is himself terrible.

I'm not denying his abilities. I'm aware of them and don't make up pretend ones. He slowly stalks after his opponents in the tiny rings they put him in, he pins them very well against the ropes. He has a strong one speed jab that he throws with a glove up to catch the opponents Jab. He has great use of his shoulders when punching and good accuracy.

That's about it, He doesn't consistently change levels or move his head. He certainly won't stand with them in the pocket. You guys are liars because he hates trading punches and backs up straight out with his hands wide pen after being hit.
.

Nobody said he's a perfect fighter, he's doing things in the ring, shifting, cutting off the ring most elite fighters can't do anymore.

He has the great equalizer of his power and it's become a myth to the point of Floyd's defense, in the way it affects the opponent before they ever experience it, that is a great compliment to him. Remember Broner is on the same +- list as GGG.
.

Same list?

You love GGG and Hate Broner...Why can't you just admit that.

Oh and P.S I think GGG has avoided Lara for the very reason he would look like Broner against Paulie.

I don't hate Broner, I just think he's an idiot, but I was embarassed when Maidana slapped him, so I guess I don't hate him.
Also said it was ****** for him to jump to 147, he had no business at this weight.

I just hate when people compare him to GGG who is a much more serious fighter, always in shape and at the right weight.

Lst point : so GGG needs a Lara to look bad, Broner Paulie, agreed

[therealpugilist]

You're a groupie because you only state negative facts when it comes to GGG and positive facts when it comes to your heroe.

ODLH, PAC, COTTO, MOSLEY, be honnest, he fought them out of their prime, and that's what people dislike about him, all the greats he fought where past it.
Maybe be not his fault and I know, he wasn't spring chicken himself.

But we can critisize it, just like you can critisize GGG for fighting Wade instead of Nelo, Monroe Jr instead of Cotto, Proska instead of Martinez.

But again, is it his own fault...seems like only May jr get a pass.

Saying a unified champion, decorated amateur champion is an unproven, overhyped fighter is ******ed.
He needs big name to enter the HOF but he's not an unproven fighter.
Spence Jr is an unproven fighter.

Floyd is by your logic unproven as an ATG since he never beat an ATG close to his prime...

thanks for acknowledging I give facts whether you like them or not


news flash...A 30+ year old campaigning in his 4th and 5th weight class is not prime either, unless you think mayweather is some black highlander lol


get out of your feelings

Mayweather was clearly the best of his generation and recieved more criticism than any fighter I have ever seen in my life

Sorry bro...GGG is not immune to criticism, especially when the same people trashed mayweather give GGG a pass and make excuses why he hasnt took any risks