Why is Broner criticized yet GGG praised?

[BillyBoxing]

That same Murray that was on ***** street every time Groves touched him?

Was that a Prime Martinez and Sturm he arguably beat?

Didn't Cotto destroy Geale in the same manner one fight later?

Who has GGG beaten that hasn't already been beaten in the same manor by a fighter who isn't horrendously overrated? Wade? Is that really it?

GGG beat Geale and Murray before their fights with Cotto and Groves.

You should know that.

You gotta take in count who they were WHEN they fought GGG.

They both only lost by SD, then GGG destroyed both.

GGG took Geale's soul.
He literraly humiliated and destroyed him.

After this loss, Geale fought once a journeyman then cashed out vs Cotto.

Cotto who prefered to fight GGG's last victim Geale than GGG himself.

Does Geale bring more money than GGG or is more relevant than GGG?

Yeah, that's right, Cotto ducked GGG.

[BillyBoxing]

naw...he is the most overrated....he is "hated" in the eyes of his die hard fans because people criticize his resume, and expect the best out of him

no one expects more out of him than anyother fighter.

So being hated is an exaggeration

it annoys fans of boxing when you anoint or pump up fighters who have done less than fighter, than other fighters they criticized.

You call yourself a die hard fan but you're obviously a Floyd groupie.

And he's being critisized by Floyd groupies.

Every real die hard fan knows he has been openly ducked, and this is the main reason why he doesn't have names like Cotto, Martinez or Alvarez on his resume.

Because they openly ducked him, vacating a belt as the last exemple.

[BillyBoxing]

there are no morale victories in boxing

Martin Murray is what he is...a tough euro level fighter who can give world rated guys a tough time but never actually beat anyone world class.

Geale is a pretty good fighter but he is no world beater considering he got blitzed by Cotto. Wouldnt say he is the type of opponent that brings p4p ramifications. Geale just may be his best win.

Being unified champion loses a lot of luster when you dont even fight for your titles.

Hopkins fought for every single one of his belts and defended the undisputed title 6 times....all the ibf trinket defenses are nice but the opposition was thin just like GGG's wba super and regular defenses. Difference is Hopkins PROVED he was the best middleweight and GGG has not.

therefore even if he wins the wbo there is still a dispute on his claim to being champion.

Boxing is simple....to be the man you beat the man, or eliminate the top 1-3 guys with a claim, GGG hasnt

Broner has taken more risks...fought more titlists, fought in more divisions.....fighting Maidana and Porter was no small order...broner is not a welterweight. Small with a low punch output.


I dont put much stock into most of the alphabet belts. Broner jumping 140 and trying to compete at 147 is a bigger accomplishment than the belts....starting @ 135 and below and winning a title at 147 is one of the hardest jumps in boxing

People are downing Paulie Malignaggi now because he is washed up. If you watch Paulie fight and his resume when he fought Broner he only had 4 losses and one was a robbery to former champion Juan Diaz, Hall of famers Cotto, Hatton and former champion Khan. He had defeated former titilts Ndou, Juan Diaz, Ngoudjo, Senchenko, and Judah. Always tried his best vs the best but lately he is just past it....he wasnt when he fought Broner, he was only 31 with 4 losses.

IMO moving up and fighting a perennial guy Like Paulie who won titles at two divisions in his own right is more impressive than Beating Daniel Geale, Murray,etc.

Malignaggi isn't and never was an elite fighter.

He lost every rounds to Kahn, Hatton and Cotto.
Sure, Paulie has heart.

Paulie beat a shot/10 losses Judah, heel yeah, I think a prime Geale is a better win than a shot Judah or a shot Malignaggi, those guys are irrelevant in boxing right now.

Geale was a unified IBF WBA champ at 160.
Winning his titles, he beat Sturm and Sylvester who are better guys IMO than Senchenko and N Dou (Paulie titles fights).

Malignaggi always was a B fighter at best and the old version of himself gave Broner hell.
It wasn't a size affair, Paulie is a former 140 pounders and can't punch, he schooled AB.

Broner has been exposed, he took more risks obviously.

But I think GGG is a better fighter based on his amateur pedigree, and how he's destroying the competition.

Any person thinking AB > GGG is either a ****** or DKSAB.

Agreed Broner took more risks at this point.

[PivotandRoll]

GGG beat Geale and Murray before their fights with Cotto and Groves.

You should know that.

You gotta take in count who they were WHEN they fought GGG.

They both only lost by SD, then GGG destroyed both.

GGG took Geale's soul.
He literraly humiliated and destroyed him.

After this loss, Geale fought once a journeyman then cashed out vs Cotto.

Cotto who prefered to fight GGG's last victim Geale than GGG himself.

Does Geale bring more money than GGG or is more relevant than GGG?

Yeah, that's right, Cotto ducked GGG.

Pathetic....

[BillyBoxing]

Pathetic....

Lack of arguments?

You just did bring up some wrong facts wich needed to be answered.


I guess every statement not bashing GGG is pathetic...

[joemama]

Broner might have fought better fighters but he lost to them

[STAX ON DECK]

they hate to see a black man with confidence and swaggy

[PivotandRoll]

Lack of arguments?

You just did bring up some wrong facts wich needed to be answered.


I guess every statement not bashing GGG is pathetic...

No you are jumping through hoops to make it seem like GGG is some incredible fighter with amazing feats. No one had said Murray had declined, if anything people thought the new weightclass suited him better and he'd beat Groves.

And you pretend Geale was a lesser fighter ONLY because it suits your fantasy. Cotto destroyed Geale just as easy with his skills and it was pretty obvious. And let me guess, Lemieux is an amazing reborn fighter since his KO lost to Rubio and decision loss to Alcine(who Macklin KO'd in 1rd)

Yes, Cotto ducked him. Why are you always trying to deflect to other fighters?

[PivotandRoll]

Malignaggi isn't and never was an elite fighter.

He lost every rounds to Kahn, Hatton and Cotto.
Sure, Paulie has heart.

Paulie beat a shot/10 losses Judah, heel yeah, I think a prime Geale is a better win than a shot Judah or a shot Malignaggi, those guys are irrelevant in boxing right now.

Geale was a unified IBF WBA champ at 160.
Winning his titles, he beat Sturm and Sylvester who are better guys IMO than Senchenko and N Dou (Paulie titles fights).

Malignaggi always was a B fighter at best and the old version of himself gave Broner hell.
It wasn't a size affair, Paulie is a former 140 pounders and can't punch, he schooled AB.

Broner has been exposed, he took more risks obviously.

But I think GGG is a better fighter based on his amateur pedigree, and how he's destroying the competition.

Any person thinking AB > GGG is either a ****** or DKSAB.

Agreed Broner took more risks at this point.

And when did Broner lose to those guys at 135???? Oh wait he lost two weights up right? So we can wait until GGG goes to 175 to compare

Schooled AB? Wow you pathetic fanboy. Broner had Paulie on bambi legs more times than I can count in that fight, You know punches on the guard aren't scoring punches right?

[PK3434]

Why is this thread still open?

There are literally posters on here that have complete accounts dedicated to hating on Golovkin. Some of them even make daily threads about how pathetic they think Golovkin is. He is the most talked about, and most criticized fighter on this message board.

Broner is either considered a clown, or a pretty good fighter. Nobody really dwells on him too much anymore.