By a show of hands, who defended Pac refusing random tests/40 mil, but attack Jacobs?

[SilverMiles]

Point is, who are you to dictate what another fighter thinks he's worth?

Bob Arum told Floyd Mayweather how much he was worth.... The reality was, Bob Arum didn't know schit.

Floyd Mayweather told Manny Pacquiao how much he was worth... The reality was, Floyd Mayweather didn't know schit.

Now, some guy named {insert your favorite GGG cuckhold} is trying to tell Danny Jacobs how much he's worth.... The reality is, your favorite GGG cuckhold doesn't know schit.

Fans dictate the fighters worth, not the fighter himself. Fighters increase their value by fighting and persuading the fans to see them fight more often.

[Chollo Vista]

Hold on, are we comparing Pacquiao to Daniel Jacobs now?

Pacquaio sold 3 times more PPVs than Daniel Jacobs got viewers on free TV.

HOW IS THIS THREAD STILL GOING?

Because it's a valid point and shows the capricious arbitrary decision making of this forum.

When Pac says it's about the $$$ against Mayweather, not about who the best is, it's ok.

When GGG says it's about the money against Ward, not about who the best is, it's ok.

When GGG says it's about the money against Lara, not about who the best is, it's ok.

Anybody else that says "it's about the money" and aren't the right complexion, they're ducking and it's not ok.

This is a proven fact from you and your boys.

[Chollo Vista]

Fans dictate the fighters worth, not the fighter himself. Fighters increase their value by fighting and persuading the fans to see them fight more often.

Here's exhibit Q.

If Pac says he'd rather fight Bradley for 26 mil instead of fighting the biggest fight in boxing history against the P4P #1 fighter of the last 20 years, Floyd Mayweather for 40 mil, it's ok because "money matters".

When GGG says he wants to fight Chavez Jr instead of Andre Ward, it's ok because the best fighting the best doesn't matter. Money matters.

When FMJ says he won't sign to fight for Bob Arum because money matters, he's a cowardly duck.

If Danny Jacobs says he won't fight GGG because the money isn't right, he's a cowardly duck.

[j0zef]

Because it's a valid point and shows the capricious arbitrary decision making of this forum.

When Pac says it's about the $$$ against Mayweather, not about who the best is, it's ok.

When GGG says it's about the money against Ward, not about who the best is, it's ok.

When GGG says it's about the money against Lara, not about who the best is, it's ok.

Anybody else that says "it's about the money" and aren't the right complexion, they're ducking and it's not ok.

This is a proven fact from you and your boys.

Dude, your ridiculous fandom has you defending Jacobs' sending out fake call outs by comparing him to Pacquaio. Stop.

Even the worst Golovkin fan on this site has never attempted anything this crazy and ridiculous.

[Chollo Vista]

Dude, your ridiculous fandom has you defending Jacobs' sending out fake call outs by comparing him to Pacquaio. Stop.

Even the worst Golovkin fan on this site has never attempted anything this crazy and ridiculous.

Unfortunately, the truth is the truth.

It's funny when I make you guys argue against your own arguments.

[j0zef]

Unfortunately, the truth is the truth.

It's funny when I make you guys argue against your own arguments.

[Chollo Vista]

This is interesting because when hyperbole tactics don't work, let's post a 1:31 second video repeating 5 words.

This is a sign of true defeat when one realizes he's been arguing against his own argument.

[jqSide]

Since you brought up the so-called superbowl of boxing,

Do you believe Pacquiao was afraid of Mayweather? If you ask me, I didn't see it in the fight. He was the aggressor.

Do you believe Jacobs is afraid of Golovkin? It's obvious. Sad part is ducking will do him no good.

Ducking won't pay in this case. Ask Floyd.

[elgu]

Because it's a valid point and shows the capricious arbitrary decision making of this forum.

When Pac says it's about the $$$ against Mayweather, not about who the best is, it's ok.

When GGG says it's about the money against Ward, not about who the best is, it's ok.

When GGG says it's about the money against Lara, not about who the best is, it's ok.

Anybody else that says "it's about the money" and aren't the right complexion, they're ducking and it's not ok.

This is a proven fact from you and your boys.

Here's exhibit Q.

If Pac says he'd rather fight Bradley for 26 mil instead of fighting the biggest fight in boxing history against the P4P #1 fighter of the last 20 years, Floyd Mayweather for 40 mil, it's ok because "money matters".

When GGG says he wants to fight Chavez Jr instead of Andre Ward, it's ok because the best fighting the best doesn't matter. Money matters.

When FMJ says he won't sign to fight for Bob Arum because money matters, he's a cowardly duck.

If Danny Jacobs says he won't fight GGG because the money isn't right, he's a cowardly duck.

Pac was worth more than what he was offered.

The 1st time around in 2013 Ward ducked GGG when he was the A side. Then when he no longer was the A side Ward asked for more Money than he was worth worth.

Lara doesn't bring anything to the table, is always fighting bums, is not a middleweight, and definitely gets paid more than he is worth.

Jacobs ridiculously over priced himself out of the GGG fight.

Floyd wanted out of the contract with arum and got his wish. That still doesn't change the fact that he ducked Williams, Margarito, and prime Cotto. He is a coward duck.

There is no conspiracy. Just overpaid bizznezzmen posing as boxers and ducking fights.

[Chollo Vista]

JQ

I believe Pacquiao cared about money and that's ok with you.

I believe when talking about Ward and Lara, GGG cares about money and that's ok with you.

I believe when talking about GGG, Jacobs cares about money and for some reason, that's not ok with you.

How weird.