By a show of hands, who defended Pac refusing random tests/40 mil, but attack Jacobs?

[elgu]

Nope, just using your argument against your own argument

You said I was ****** because I quoted half a post. NATAS does the same thing, why doesn't the same apply?

Why deflect that you're arbitrary in your decision making?

You quoted me out of context Nata did within context. Please tell me you can at least understand that.

[Zaroku]

Point is, who are you to dictate what another fighter thinks he's worth?

Bob Arum told Floyd Mayweather how much he was worth.... The reality was, Bob Arum didn't know schit.

Floyd Mayweather told Manny Pacquiao how much he was worth... The reality was, Floyd Mayweather didn't know schit.

Now, some guy named {insert your favorite GGG cuckhold} is trying to tell Danny Jacobs how much he's worth.... The reality is, your favorite GGG cuckhold doesn't know schit.

Great logic! Excellent!

[Chollo Vista]

Great logic! Excellent!

It's just hilarious how they defend GGG and Pacquiao's "smart bizness" moves in one breath and then it's all of a sudden no longer about the money and the best should fight the best in the next breath.

The dichotomy of expectations for one set of fighters and the disdain for fighters that do the exact same thing in another breath is dazzling

[PK3434]

These false equivalence threads are the worst. The situations have nothing in common. A more fair comparison would be criticizing Jacobs for not accepting 500k for a Golovkin fight.

[Chollo Vista]

GGG is making smart "bizness" moves by fighting Chavez Jr at 168, but it's no longer about $$$ and smart "bizness" moves when talking about fighting Canelo @ 155 in the next breath; it's about the best vs the best.

Even though GGG would make more $$$ at 155 vs Canelo than he would make at 168 vs Chavez Jr. But it's no longer about the $$$ when mentioning Canelo @ 155, it's about "the best".

But if we're talking about GGG vs Ward/Lara, it's no longer about "the best vs the best", now we're back to the "bizness" side of negotiations. Hmmm, how convenient?

But if Jacobs wants to make a smart business move by trolling guys on twitter or by fighting whoever he wants in the meantime or an effort to build the potential Jacobs vs GGG fight, the same guys that understand "GGG and Pac's" smart business moves, no longer understand business, now they want the best to fight the best and it's a duck.

The arbitrary rationale of these folks is painfully excruciating at times. And anyone that speaks on this is attacked in large sums "DDoS" style.

[Derranged]

That fight doesn't generate enough money for jacobs to get 4-5 mil. Ggg would have to practically fight for free.

Don't bother arguing with him, he's slightly ******ed.

[Zaroku]

It's just hilarious how they defend GGG and Pacquiao's "smart bizness" moves in one breath and then it's all of a sudden no longer about the money and the best should fight the best in the next breath.

The dichotomy of expectations for one set of fighters and the disdain for fighters that do the exact same thing in another breath is dazzling

So that Blackman named Floyd/Ployd really upset a lot of people.

Seems like that God gifted Olympic goldmedalist, and winner of the super six, gets criticized for warped reasons.

Your clowns need a big poppa!

Fathers are needed, how have we come to this ****?

[Chollo Vista]

Don't bother arguing with him, he's slightly ******ed.

With anything in this thing called life, there's two sides to a story. If someone doesn't agree with you and your fellow cuckhold's POV, then the logical way of thinking is to ad hominem attack said poster to death DDoS style while using massive hyperbole.

Yeah, that's the idea Mr. Derranged. How fitting of a name, BTW

[Chollo Vista]

So that Blackman named Floyd/Ployd really upset a lot of people.

Seems like that God gifted Olympic goldmedalist, and winner of the super six, gets criticized for warped reasons.

Your clowns need a big poppa!

Fathers are needed, how have we come to this ****?

I have my disdain for Mr. Mayweather as wel, but that's another story. But I get your point, many of the beef's between Floyd and Pac has carried over to contemporary arguments today.

[Chuckguy]

Manny was the second biggest draw in boxing a t the time. How the fawk can a $40 million offer be fair? Floyd would have made over $400 million to mannys $40 and you don't have a problem with that?
Then you have the nerve to say it's ok for Jacobs to ask fo $4 million!
This sh it is fawking amazing! You can't dream this sh it up.
Keep hating my friends