Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is better: Paul Smith/Barrera or David Lemieux/Murray/Macklin/Geale
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Sadiqkingofko View Postbro you need to stop comparing Golovkin to Ward, its not even a matter of opinion. Everyone knows Ward is more accomplished, Golovkin a person i really like hasn't done anything career than he thinks Canelo should meet his requirements, its absurd. Golovkin said he would come down to 154 for floyd but not Canelo, said he would go up to 168 for Froch but not Ward. He chases money not legacy.
I think the poll speaks for itself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostThat's not going into detail, that's just listing names.
Be a man and admit you dont like Ward because if the fight happened with GGG, you were not confident of a GGG win so you want Ward to get injured or take a loss already.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Posttheir both euro level....Happy?
Smith was barely even domestic level in the UK.
So no, they aren't the same. Stop trying to damage control for your "homies".
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1g5a22 View PostMurray has proven he can compete at world level consistently. Smith, Brand & Sullivan have not. Murray>Those.
Geale & Lemieux have a better win set than the 3 Ward opponents. Sturm, Sylvester, Karmazin, Mundine, N'dam, Guerrero, Rosado & Fletcher.
1 of them was also a rival champion.
Golovkins3>Wards 3.
Brand arguably beat current SMW champion Jack and just came off a win against a young undefeated contender.
Geale got destroyed by jmw Cotto, Lemieux's punches have been walked through by the likes of 154lber Alcine and Rubio (Alcine consistently rocked him) and his opponents connect at ridiculous %'s which is why N'dam was still in the fight despite getting dropped 3x.
Barrera destroyed Murat and out boxed him in the process, not even Hopkins could do that who was eating and trading leather with him the full 12 rounds.
Smith and Barrera>lil g's resume
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostTS is such a crap poster. And the sad part is he actually thinks he some boxing historian. Lol. Pathetic.
also why compare the time when a guy had legal issues and injuries and only fought like 3-4 times.
too much of a punk to just compare their full body of work because he knows what time it is...side by side, one guys looks like a decent resume...GGG...the other guys looks like an elite resume..
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostIt's arguable whether or not Murray is euro level or above, considering his performances against world champions.
Smith was barely even domestic level in the UK.
So no, they aren't the same. Stop trying to damage control for your "homies".
styles makes fights
being able to hang or compete is not the same as actually winning...winning is what its about...their is no morale victories in boxing
both are euro level and never beat a world class opponent
Comment
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostWho said I'm comparing GGG and Ward? I'm just pointing out that a certain poster said Paul Smith was better than Murray, or at least on par. Is that what you also think?
I think the poll speaks for itself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sadiqkingofko View PostNo way smith is better than murray but Groves proved Murray was overrated tho
Comment
Comment