Comments Thread For: Koncz: If Pacquiao Returns, Crawford Not a Thought - Never Was!

[Lester Tutor]

Koncz ready to make another mistake filling out those so called medical waivers!

[turnedup]

Damn. Are you attracted to Crawford? You seem to have a big hard on for him. I've been a fan of boxing since 1965, and I can tell you son that...Crawford (although maybe not the best) is definitely legit. He would beat Broner senseless...actually, I'm guessing Broner would quit in that fight. Maybe bite Crawford or something. Or sprain an ankle. You get the picture

Oh here we go with the "are you attracted" gay subliminals. If you really have been watching boxing since 1965 I would expect you to be a little more mature than that buddy. Also your statement is an assumption/opinion. We've seen Broner on the big stage, we don't know how Crawford performs on a big stage. Also for the record if you've really watched boxing that long please learn to stop making predictions, you've seen enough fights go the wrong way to not be making such bold predictions such as "quitting".

[ShoulderRoll]

and yet (I can't believe i'm about to say this) Broner is more proven than Crawford....go figure. Please enlighten me on what Crawford brings to the table besides his ZERO? Seriously the guy has the fanbase of Rigondeaux at this point. Both men that beat Adrian beat Crawford as well.

Crawford regularly draws 10,000+ in Omaha. What's the attendance like for Broner's fights in Cincinnati?

Crawford is about to headline his own PPV. Has Broner even been on a televised PPV undercard?

Crawford is the WBO champion and is about to fight for the WBC championship. What belt does Broner have?

The only thing Broner brings to the table is his big mouth and the fact that he is very beatable. Terence Crawford obviously is too much of a risk for Pacquiao.

[jqSide]

Crawford regularly draws 10,000+ in Omaha. What's the attendance like for Broner's fights in Cincinnati?

Crawford is about to headline his own PPV. Has Broner even been on a televised PPV undercard?

Crawford is the WBO champion and is about to fight for the WBC championship. What belt does Broner have?

The only thing Broner brings to the table is his big mouth and the fact that he is very beatable. Terence Crawford obviously is too much of a risk for Pacquiao.

You didn't spend same amount of time bashing the best eva when he fought Berto. The same TBE who beat Pac.

Are you saying Haymon has been wasting money on Broner all these years giving him average of $1.2 million per fight?

Even if everything you say here is true, don't you think young, prime fighters like Broner, Crawford and others ought to fight fellow young fighters in their primes, instead of a 37 yr old guy who is past his prime?

[jas]

isn't this clown the same guy who couldn't read a medical form?

[BrometheusBob.]

Koncz filling in the gap for Abel who has been silent lately

[carlos djackal]

Crawford, THurman, Porter is dangerous water for Pacman, his team will naturally ducked the three. However, Bob would love Pac to fight with Crawford, he's been building Crawford for quite some time now, IN with the NEW, OUT with the OLD

[ADP02]

and if that fight would have been made and Manny won, the same posters who are praising Crawford would say "Manny picked on a guy that fought nobody and was still greenish"

Crawford has lots of potential but lets see him win a few big fights. His next fight is a very good and big step.

[bobd9842]

Oh here we go with the "are you attracted" gay subliminals. If you really have been watching boxing since 1965 I would expect you to be a little more mature than that buddy. Also your statement is an assumption/opinion. We've seen Broner on the big stage, we don't know how Crawford performs on a big stage. Also for the record if you've really watched boxing that long please learn to stop making predictions, you've seen enough fights go the wrong way to not be making such bold predictions such as "quitting".

You say: "Both men that beat Adrian beat Crawford as well." And that allows me to parrot your (wise statement)
"Also for the record if you've really watched boxing that long please learn to stop making predictions, you've seen enough fights go the wrong way to not be making such bold predictions such as "quitting"."
So...Are you even vaguely aware of the gross hypocrisy in your narrative?

It's so obvious...your negative bias towards Crawford...that I am embarrassed that I even have to bring it up. (Embarrassed for you). I don't know if you are a PBC homer...or anti Arum...or what your deal is but...don't take it out on Crawford. If you are the boxing afficionado that you obviously seem to enjoy trying to portray yourself as...then you know the talent that Crawford has. Does he have weaknesses? Of course he does. Who doesn't?

My statement about Broner "quitting" was more an exaggerated indictment on his obvious character flaws. And simply a way to get your attention on your own hypocrisy. But at the same time...if Broner ever actually quit a fight because he was getting beaten...it certainly would not surprise me...or anyone else for that matter.

So seriously...whose opinion is closer to reality...yours or mine? That question is posed to anyone else reading. And you may want to check your maturity level at the door...before putting your foot in your mouth again.

[turnedup]

You say: "Both men that beat Adrian beat Crawford as well." And that allows me to parrot your (wise statement)
"Also for the record if you've really watched boxing that long please learn to stop making predictions, you've seen enough fights go the wrong way to not be making such bold predictions such as "quitting"."
So...Are you even vaguely aware of the gross hypocrisy in your narrative?

It's so obvious...your negative bias towards Crawford...that I am embarrassed that I even have to bring it up. (Embarrassed for you). I don't know if you are a PBC homer...or anti Arum...or what your deal is but...don't take it out on Crawford. If you are the boxing afficionado that you obviously seem to enjoy trying to portray yourself as...then you know the talent that Crawford has. Does he have weaknesses? Of course he does. Who doesn't?

My statement about Broner "quitting" was more an exaggerated indictment on his obvious character flaws. And simply a way to get your attention on your own hypocrisy. But at the same time...if Broner ever actually quit a fight because he was getting beaten...it certainly would not surprise me...or anyone else for that matter.

So seriously...whose opinion is closer to reality...yours or mine? That question is posed to anyone else reading. And you may want to check your maturity level at the door...before putting your foot in your mouth again.

In so many words fk off..i'm biased over Crawford whose biggest profile fight has been Gamboa...yes GAMBOA! This is the guy that's going to beat a man who has between greater talent than Crawford over and over again. Until Crawford shows us his true mettle please sit down and stfu. We know what Broner can do if he's not caught up in the bullshhh outside of the ring, we've seen what Broner can actually do against legit opposition even in his losses. Crawford was losing the Gamboa fight until he dropped him...smaller, lighter, less powerful GAMBOA.