Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Koncz: If Pacquiao Returns, Crawford Not a Thought - Never Was!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Pacquiao is an accomplished Welterweight and Broner clearly struggles at 147. Numerous elite Welterweights are prepared to take that Broner money.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by HAY-B View Post
      Manny will fight who Arum says he will fight. Don't think for one second Manny selects his opponents. Bob may give him a few names but if he chooses one Bob doesn't really want him to fight, Bob will make an excuse why the fight can't be made then he'll tell Manny to pick again so Manny thinks he's making the desicion as to who he's fighting.
      Arum runs the show.
      Koncz did contact Broner pre Bradley 3. Broner confirmed it. Arum objected and he wanted his in-house trilogy with Bradley. And now the old man is ridden with guilt, made friends with Haymon and now trying to make the fight happen. But it's too late. Pac's political rivals will raise hell if he leaves his government post even if only temporarily. It's his fault for entering politics.

      Comment


      • #23
        AB is a good scrap man, I would have liked to see Floyd vs AB becaue of the drama but ill take Pac vs AB, its a dam good scrap, I think AB will come to fight, I got him by KO he has legit power, he was able to drop Porter while Thurman wasnt.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by turnedup View Post
          Yo the c@cksucking of Crawford in here is at an all time high...seriously Crawford. Mofo's talking about Crawford knocking a living legend out..based on what? Gamboa and Lundy? Crawford is a promising fighter...Key..PROMISING. He hasn't shown to be an elite by any stretch of the imagination. Stop disrespecting legends so boldly. Even at this age Pacquaio toys with Crawford...there's levels to this shh..It's as bad as mofo's saying Garcia would trouble Mayweather.
          Team Pac would rather c@cksuck Adrien Broner instead. As if he is more deserving.

          It's obvious that Pacquiao is wary of Crawford. That's why he'd rather fight the flawed and twice beaten Broner.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
            Team Pac would rather c@cksuck Adrien Broner instead. As if he is more deserving.

            It's obvious that Pacquiao is wary of Crawford. That's why he'd rather fight the flawed and twice beaten Broner.
            You didn't answer his question. Pac is wary of Crawford based on what? Gamboa? Dierry, Lundy and a host of cab drivers?

            In your opinion why did Floyd avoid Lara?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
              Team Pac would rather c@cksuck Adrien Broner instead. As if he is more deserving.

              It's obvious that Pacquiao is wary of Crawford. That's why he'd rather fight the flawed and twice beaten Broner.
              And Broner would rather fight the knocked out cold several time beaten near 4o Pacquiao?

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by JQside View Post
                You didn't answer his question. Pac is wary of Crawford based on what? Gamboa? Dierry, Lundy and a host of cab drivers?

                In your opinion why did Floyd avoid Lara?
                Good point regarding Floyd vs. Lara. I think Lara would beat Floyd, or made him look very bad! Since Lara has no fan base, Floyd side-stepped him. Same with Crawford. Manny could have fought Broner, Crawford, Thurman, or Brook. He chose Bradley, when no one in the world wanted to see that fight. Crawford is like Lara, "high-risk" low reward!

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                  Team Pac would rather c@cksuck Adrien Broner instead. As if he is more deserving.

                  It's obvious that Pacquiao is wary of Crawford. That's why he'd rather fight the flawed and twice beaten Broner.
                  and yet (I can't believe i'm about to say this) Broner is more proven than Crawford....go figure. Please enlighten me on what Crawford brings to the table besides his ZERO? Seriously the guy has the fanbase of Rigondeaux at this point. Both men that beat Adrian beat Crawford as well.
                  Last edited by turnedup; 06-30-2016, 11:39 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    LOL suck it Crawford you Dave Chapelle pretending to be a crackhead looking nobody. Arum lied to you. Get your afro out of your ass and get down to Golden Boy where the real money and the real fights are made. Otherwise enjoy the 15k title fight purses in China against your own landscaper/future boss.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by turnedup View Post
                      and yet (I can't believe i'm about to say this) Broner is more proven than Crawford....go figure. Please enlighten me on what Crawford brings to the table besides his ZERO? Seriously the guy has the fanbase of Rigondeaux at this point. Both men that beat Adrian beat Crawford as well.
                      Damn. Are you attracted to Crawford? You seem to have a big hard on for him. I've been a fan of boxing since 1965, and I can tell you son that...Crawford (although maybe not the best) is definitely legit. He would beat Broner senseless...actually, I'm guessing Broner would quit in that fight. Maybe bite Crawford or something. Or sprain an ankle. You get the picture

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP