Lil G fighting his 3rd prospect in 4 fights

[HeroBando]

You are probably right.

But, this underscores a point I have been making.

There is a huge difference between who Gennady thinks he is and who he actually is.

If you are truly a star, opponents can ask for and get that kind of money.

Lil g clearly isn't there yet; but you wouldn't know it by the way they act.

That's why I don't blame Saunders for asking for that much- and I believe that if they fight in the UK, purse figures better than what lil g and Lemieux got are quite possible.

No they can't, fcuking idiot. Most Floyd opponents got less Ffs. Where do they find these idiots?

[Kigali]

if you really think the bold you have no business talking about boxing. this will be his 7th top 10 contender since he came to america. you genuinely have no idea what a prospect is.




canelo's team won't even negotiate with golovkin. they dropped a belt to avoid having to negotiate. now they've got a "verbal agreement" to fight when golovkin is 35 years old. they didn't say "155 or no fight," like they had in the past. they simply said, "take the belt. no fight."

yet it's golovkin's fault that the dudde with the middleweight championship fo tehw orld wants to make him fight at 155 lbs



now, onto ward:
i think there was an opportunity for that fight to happen, however fleeting the opportunity was. i'd have to go back through the timeline. i don't know if ward could have made 164, and i actually doubt it, but it does appear that the fight was conceivable for a period of time, given the independence of their promotors, both fighters' ties to HBO.


that's what you call "objectivity." you clearly don't have it


keep blaming golovkin for being ducked by three lineal champions in a row. this alvarez embarassment withthe MW championship has never happened in boxing. and you're amking excuses for it and loving it because you're a *****

A pu.ssy gets all moist and starts calling names from the safety of a keyboard.

That makes you look like a

We've seen all these ducked and dangerous fighters get exposed as the shams they are.

We've just never seen one as old and unproven as Gigi.

"Anybody from 154 to 168" was fleeting wasn't it????


Andre Ward single-handedly made them shut that noise up.

[New England]

We've seen all these ducked and dangerous fighters get exposed as the shams they are.

We've just never seen one as old and unproven as Gigi.

"Anybody from 154 to 168" was fleeting wasn't it????


Andre Ward single-handedly made them shut that noise up.

starting to think you're a troll. i'm an important guy, bruh. y ou're not going to get me to respond if you don't come up with a resistance less futile.

golovkin has 6 top 10 guys on his dossier. hasn't gone the distance in 8 years. he's top 3 on basically every major p4p publication.


name 10 better p4p fighters, or any better middleweights.

[HeroBando]

I'll say this. Before Canelo made his decision there was talk from Loeffler about fighting Jacobs and the WBA calling a mandatory. Since Canelo made his decision I've heard nothing from Loeffler about Jacobs. Both sides have been su****iously quiet. Can either fighter ask the WBA to call a mandatory?

The WBA said they inquired about both guys availability for the mando, were told bad time for Jacobs, he's got Mora in sight

[Graz]

Oh we wa wa wa Golovkin might be fighting Eubanks. Monroe was available when Cotto ducked him. Wade was his mandatory (at least he still takes those rights unlike Strum (Ducked Golovkin WBA) Geale (Ducked Golovkin WBA) Martinez (Ducked Golovkin WBC) Cotto (Ducked Golovkin WBC) Canelo (Ducked Golovkin WBC)). Funny how all those guys ducking him is Golovkins fault. Jacobs is going to duck him even though Jacobs is the WBA mandatory and Saunders the WBO champion won't fight him. So you think that Lara should fight him? Based on what exactly? Who has he beaten to get a shot? Has any of the governing bodies made him a mandatory? Nope. And when Golovkin wipes the floor with Lara because be honest you as a fan don't honestly think he can win, will say that oh look lil g only fights smaller guy. Get off of your sanctamonious a#$ and come to reality. The only champ with Balls was Lemieux because he stepped up when Golovkin was his mandatory.

Agree. A GGG/Lara fight would provide one more reason for GGG haters to complain. I think Lara is very talented but he would get a severe beat down if he steps in GGGs ring. If anyone doesn't believe that they're delusional. Lemieux hits harder than most in that division. Doubters should watch that fight again and tell us why GGG would have any reason to duck anybody. Short of Andre Ward I don't see anyone who can offer him competition.

[koolkc107]

if you really think the bold you have no business talking about boxing. this will be his 7th top 10 contender since he came to america. you genuinely have no idea what a prospect is.




canelo's team won't even negotiate with golovkin. they dropped a belt to avoid having to negotiate. now they've got a "verbal agreement" to fight when golovkin is 35 years old. they didn't say "155 or no fight," like they had in the past. they simply said, "take the belt. no fight."

yet it's golovkin's fault that the dudde with the middleweight championship fo tehw orld wants to make him fight at 155 lbs



now, onto ward:
i think there was an opportunity for that fight to happen, however fleeting the opportunity was. i'd have to go back through the timeline. i don't know if ward could have made 164, and i actually doubt it, but it does appear that the fight was conceivable for a period of time, given the independence of their promotors, both fighters' ties to HBO.


that's what you call "objectivity." you clearly don't have it


keep blaming golovkin for being ducked by three lineal champions in a row. this alvarez embarassment withthe MW championship has never happened in boxing. and you're amking excuses for it and loving it because you're a *****

Top 10 according to who? And those 3 lineal champions in a row who allegedly ducked lil g all had bigger more lucrative fish to fry and did exactly that.

And they were all smaller middleweights who were A-sides and who had every right to want concessions.

If Golovkin really wanted those fights, he'd have made them.

But there is a whole laundry list of younger fighters who have better resumes than GGG.

Look at the two welters fighting tonite.
Look at the names on their resumes.
Both men over 6 years younger than Golovkin.

Porter has Malignaggi, Broner, Brook, Alexander and one or two other world class or near world class guys.

Thurman has Collazo, Guerrero, Soto Karass, Chavez, Quintana, and Zavak as well as others.

Where are the names on Golovkin's resume that equal this?

Ishida? Stevens?

C'mon...

[DJ_Quaaludes]

No they can't, fcuking idiot. Most Floyd opponents got less Ffs. Where do they find these idiots?

Yeah, gotta love people that say 'Lil g is nobody, isn't a draw, feasting on bums, can't wait for him to get exposed!'

These same people then justify so-called 'champions' turning down career high paydays because they 'can't blame them for wanting more'. If GGG is a nobody just waiting to be exposed, why aren't others taking the opportunity to do so for career high money?? I think I trust what the fighters themselves are saying by their actions then I do these keyboard warriors (accountants).

Again it isn't the prospect of losing alone that causes people to run, it's 'how' they may lose.

The ideal that Lara would shut up GGG's detractors is hilarious. Ward could have, but that fight didn't happen because of posturing on both sides. Being objective, I don't think Ward ever 'ducked' GGG, but neither did GGG 'duck' Ward. To say either is to be a fanboy (golovtard/andre bored fan, whatever derogatory term you want to use).

[DJ_Quaaludes]

Top 10 according to who? And those 3 lineal champions in a row who allegedly ducked lil g all had bigger more lucrative fish to fry and did exactly that.

And they were all smaller middleweights who were A-sides and who had every right to want concessions.

If Golovkin really wanted those fights, he'd have made them.

But there is a whole laundry list of younger fighters who have better resumes than GGG.

Look at the two welters fighting tonite.
Look at the names on their resumes.
Both men over 6 years younger than Golovkin.

Porter has Malignaggi, Broner, Brook, Alexander and one or two other world class or near world class guys.

Thurman has Collazo, Guerrero, Soto Karass, Chavez, Quintana, and Zavak as well as others.

Where are the names on Golovkin's resume that equal this?

Ishida? Stevens?

C'mon...

Hey listen, objective GGG fans aren't arguing that GGG's resume is awesome.

Fact is, it isn't.

But, he has fought the top 10 opposition and mandatories in his weight class that are willing to get in to the ring with him. All the fighters demanding MORE than just career high paydays to fight him certainly think more of him than you do.

Fact is, you named Thurman and Porter. I don't recall numerous stories of catchweights and people 'ducking' Thurman and Porter. GGG is a victim of his own skillset. Who wants to sign on for a potential career altering trucking?

As for Liam Smith being a 'bigger fish to fry'....careful, your bias is showing...

[Kigali]

starting to think you're a troll. i'm an important guy, bruh. y ou're not going to get me to respond if you don't come up with a resistance less futile.

golovkin has 6 top 10 guys on his dossier. hasn't gone the distance in 8 years. he's top 3 on basically every major p4p publication.


name 10 better p4p fighters, or any better middleweights.

Top ten doesn't mean ANYTHING in a dead division.

[New England]

Top 10 according to who? And those 3 lineal champions in a row who allegedly ducked lil g all had bigger more lucrative fish to fry and did exactly that.

And they were all smaller middleweights who were A-sides and who had every right to want concessions.

If Golovkin really wanted those fights, he'd have made them.

But there is a whole laundry list of younger fighters who have better resumes than GGG.

Look at the two welters fighting tonite.
Look at the names on their resumes.
Both men over 6 years younger than Golovkin.

Porter has Malignaggi, Broner, Brook, Alexander and one or two other world class or near world class guys.

Thurman has Collazo, Guerrero, Soto Karass, Chavez, Quintana, and Zavak as well as others.

Where are the names on Golovkin's resume that equal this?

Ishida? Stevens?

C'mon...

brook beat porter . do you guys even watch boxing?

this is a real question.


as for golovkin, he's got better quality and quantity than both thurman and porter. no objective expert is going to have either ahead of him on a p4p list.


as for those credible lists, which are a from collection of writers, tbrb is probably the most neutral, where golovkjin is 3. espn has him at 2. and ring mag, owned by GBP who promotes the guy who is ducking him like the plague and has a financial motivation not to broadcast golovkin's accomplishments has him at 3.

and bscene's p4p, contolled by a single guy which needs to be considered, has him at 4.



if you want to do some homework, and you're not here just to troll golovkin because he scares you, go check out other major publications and their top 10 p4p. you'll see golovkin at or just outside of the top 5 on virtually all of them.


but let me guess, we're all wrong and you guys, who think golovkin has "the resume of a prospect," are right.