Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Return: Eubank Jr. The Betting Favorite To Be Selected
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
Ward is in his 3rd weight class.
He was also a light heavyweight as an amateur.
Wow. Such a big step up.
It'd be a different story if they were top ranked contenders or title fights. He fought at that weight class because he could make weight at his very young age.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SniXSniPe View PostLol...
Ward turned professional back in 2004. Golovkin, 2006. Ward barely moved up in weight class to 175, yet you name him as if he made such a huge leap that GGG could never do.
Crawford? Really? His first professional fight he came in on the scales at 137 pounds, at the age of 21. He was always destined to grow into a 140 lber, but could make lightweight also because he's young.
You're really trying hard here to make GGG look bad, but the way you're going about it fails once you have clarity of the background behind each fighter
Continue to belittle the current middleweight division, but lets not pretend like super middleweight during Ward's era was so amazing and outclasses this middleweight era.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SniXSniPe View PostTrue. Andre Ward fought 6 fights at 160 pounds against no-pulse opponents.
He was also a light heavyweight as an amateur.
Wow. Such a big step up.
It'd be a different story if they were top ranked contenders or title fights. He fought at that weight class because he could make weight at his very young age.
Also can you name the reason why he fought at light heavy in the ams?
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostHopkins is a freak that was able to fight at a high level into his 50s. Therefore waiting until he was 40 for smaller guys to come up worked out for him. He's not the norm.
Ward moved up when nothing was shaking at 68. Just like nothing is shaking at 60 now.
Rigo IS what GGG claimed to be. That's feared. The double standards are mind blowing. Frampton vacated a belt, with Rigo as his mandatory. Much like the Canelo-GGG situation. Yet nobody on a supposed site full of hardcore fight fans have **** to say about it.
As for what defines greatness. The mass majority's of non-heavyweight ATGs have won titles in multiple divisions, or at least tried. There are exceptions like Monzon and Hagler. But boxing history supports my argument. Especially in the modern era where there are so many divisions and so many titles in each. Belts aren't as important because there's so many. And there's so many divisions, and they're so watered down, dominating a single divsion for an extended period of time doesn't mean ****. Its about names on your resume. And so far, GGG has none. And staying at 60, he won't get any.
Just remind me, how many unified, undisputed champions do we have in the sport today?Last edited by kafkod; 06-21-2016, 12:54 PM.
Comment
-
Comment