Comments Thread For: Roach: I'd Still Like Mayweather To Face a 'Healthy' Manny Pacquiao

[Zaroku]

I thought there were 2 contracts? One to fight then a separate contract for USADA drug testing.

I thought that was the contract that didn't agree on.

Doesn't matter anyway. Pacquiao ducked the test.

I am a bit confused..... I thought they had a slow motion pact@rd review clause. That for this one fight only, slow motion review would be allowed?

Maybe I am wrong.

[travestyny]

the debate started AFTER you responded to me. are you really this slow? this is what you wrote to me --




here's what i responded back --

how can he sign a contract when they never agreed on the drug test???? lol.......

then you came back with this, notice the "ok, lets continue" meaning THAT THE DEBATE HAS STARTED!!!



come hold this L...

1. You make no sense.

2. Why are you avoiding the question? Stop being a b*tch and answer. You aren't fooling anyone.

[WesternChamp]

1. You make no sense.

2. Why are you avoiding the question? Stop being a b*tch and answer. You aren't fooling anyone.

stop trying to beat around the bush. im not avoiding any question. your trying to spin this into a who duck who first after i made a fool out of you.

i'll answer you question when you admit that you were wrong.

the debate STARTED after you quoted me and responded with "why did floyd sign a contract if he didnt wanna fight"

you see how you aint got shit left to say? what happen to your average half page reply? lmao!

[WesternChamp]

I thought there were 2 contracts? One to fight then a separate contract for USADA drug testing.

I thought that was the contract that didn't agree on.

Doesn't matter anyway. Pacquiao ducked the test.

dont matter who duck who. the original debate was "signing a contract that wasnt agree on"

[WesternChamp]

It was in contact with JMM's foot. It's PAC's fault for jumping in front of that colossal right hand. OMG. I may write a song about it.

Epic. Where where you when it happened? One of the greatest one punch/funch KO's ever! I have trouble re watching it, it was disturbing!

zaro, thats all got? i would expect more from you. how do you trip from the side of your foot? lol

[travestyny]

stop trying to beat around the bush. im not avoiding any question. your trying to spin this into a who duck who first after i made a fool out of you.

i'll answer you question when you admit that you were wrong.

the debate STARTED after you quoted me and responded with "why did floyd sign a contract if he didnt wanna fight"

you see how you aint got shit left to say? what happen to your average half page reply? lmao!

Listen you halfwit. You have the reading comprehension skills of a 4 year old.

First you kept accusing me of saying I already told you to check with the mods, when I stated over and over to you that what I already told you was to get off my d*ck. You couldn't understand that simple concept because you are an idiot.

Next I proved you are an idiot for thinking Floyd was ducking Pac, and you're desperately trying to spin it about how he could sign a contract.

Me spin this into who ducked who???? DIDN'T YOU SAY THIS????

you know damm well floyd aint going near that manny.

not saying floyd cant beat that manny but you know damm well he wants no part of that version.

Then why did he sign a contract to fight that Manny? You know...the one that didn't want to take the drug tests. This is common knowledge by now.

This is the point I brought up the contract. That was the whole point of me mentioning the contract. You are a worthless ******, and probably about 8 years old or less. You admit that you can't answer the question the way you are desperately ducking it and trying to spin this into a debate about signing a contract, which it never was about. I could put all of you pacroaches together and you'd still have the mental capacity of less than one normal human being. Go play in traffic, clown.

[travestyny]

dont matter who duck who. the original debate was "signing a contract that wasnt agree on"

No it wasn't. You are just too much of an idiot to follow simple dialogue.

Even if the "debate" was about signing the contract, you'd still be proven a moron. You are saying how can Mayweather sign a contract that wasn't agreed upon?

With a ****ing pen, you idiot. I already explained that the contract was so detailed that it talked about who enters the ring first, and who goes on the poster first. It was obviously the product of bilateral negotiation. He signed it and sent it to Pacquaio, and it was for a 50/50 split. Pac ducked it.

So you can take the "debate" starting at any point you want. You still get embarrassed, you blundering idiot.

[WesternChamp]

No it wasn't. You are just too much of an idiot to follow simple dialogue.

Even if the "debate" was about signing the contract, you'd still be proven a moron. You are saying how can Mayweather sign a contract that wasn't agreed upon?

With a ****ing pen, you idiot. I already explained that the contract was so detailed that it talked about who enters the ring first, and who goes on the poster first. It was obviously the product of bilateral negotiation. He signed it and sent it to Pacquaio, and it was for a 50/50 split. Pac ducked it.

So you can take the "debate" starting at any point you want. You still get embarrassed, you blundering idiot.

you said he signed the contract so that means he wanted to fight manny!

i said, he signed a contract that wasnt agree on!

floyd signed what floyd was proposing to top rank! lol!

how did the debate started before that when you were the one that quoted me and replied to it. thats when i responded back and the debate started. look at how you dont even wanna address the post of out conversation LOL!!

[WesternChamp]

here is the conversation that started it all, dont ignore this now lol!!!

Then why did he sign a contract to fight that Manny? You know...the one that didn't want to take the drug tests. This is common knowledge by now.

how can he sign a contract when they never agreed on the drug test???? lol.......

Ok. So let's continue.

Floyd offered 50/50 and signed on the contract.

Pacquaio said no because he wanted a cut-off.

Mayweather offered a 14-day cut-off.

Pacquaio said no.

Now, in your opinion, who was dodging whom? Who was trying to make the fight? That's all I want to know.

once again, the 14 day was offer AFTER what top rank and arum requested.

floyd offer 50/50 signed

pac didnt agree on drug testing

top rank and arum requested what they wanted regarding testing

floyd refuse and then offer 14 day cut off

pac refuse, fight is off.

so again, the original debate was signing a contract that was NEVER agree on.

[travestyny]

you said he signed the contract so that means he wanted to fight manny!

i said, he signed a contract that wasnt agree on!

floyd signed what floyd was proposing to top rank! lol!

how did the debate started before that when you were the one that quoted me and replied to it. thats when i responded back and the debate started. look at how you dont even wanna address the post of out conversation LOL!!

The "debate" was about you saying Floyd ducked Manny? I have said this to you over and over, and I don't feel a need to say it again.

You think this was only a contract of what Mayweather wanted? Why would he want 50/50? Why would the contract say it was a fight co-promoted by Top Rank and Golden Boy, and also Mayweather Promotions.

Finally, Why would Bob Arum say this?

According to Top Rank chairman Bob Arum, they already had a contract in place.

"We have a contract that they sent us and all the terms have been agreed to," Arum said. "All this that's been going on – 'Bob Arum doesn't want it,' and 'I'm entitled to this and that,' is all [expletive]. All [expletive]. This is their lawyer who prepared this, sent copies to everyone. … This isn't something I wrote and passed out. Their lawyer did this and sent it to us."

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing--floyd-mayweather-and-manny-pacquiao-nearly-agreed-to-a-2010-fight.html

If you would have actually read the damn article, you would have seen that. So now what, chump? Do I have to keep embarrassing you, or will you let it go? Take the debate to be whatever you want it to be. You still lose.