Comments Thread For: Roach: I'd Still Like Mayweather To Face a 'Healthy' Manny Pacquiao

[WesternChamp]

Listen you halfwit. You have the reading comprehension skills of a 4 year old.

First you kept accusing me of saying I already told you to check with the mods, when I stated over and over to you that what I already told you was to get off my d*ck. You couldn't understand that simple concept because you are an idiot.

Next I proved you are an idiot for thinking Floyd was ducking Pac, and you're desperately trying to spin it about how he could sign a contract.

Me spin this into who ducked who???? DIDN'T YOU SAY THIS????




This is the point I brought up the contract. That was the whole point of me mentioning the contract. You are a worthless ******, and probably about 8 years old or less. You admit that you can't answer the question the way you are desperately ducking it and trying to spin this into a debate about signing a contract, which it never was about. I could put all of you pacroaches together and you'd still have the mental capacity of less than one normal human being. Go play in traffic, clown.

and thats when the debate started!!!!

you quoted me and said if floyd didnt wanna fight why did he sign the contract.

i responded with, how did he sign a contract that wasnt agree on?

you proceeded to post a link of the contract golden boy sent to top rank.

so what do you call this??? having a debate about a contract that wasnt agree on!!!

[champion4ever]

The fight was made six years too late when Pacquiao was in his prime. Now, for those two to fight again is irrelevant. The fight wasn't scintillating enough the first time in order to demand an encore.

[travestyny]

having a debate about a contract that wasnt agree on!!!

"We have a contract that they sent us and all the terms have been agreed to," Arum said.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing-...010-fight.html

You're done. Now tuck your tail and bow out, biotch.

[WesternChamp]

this was the first comment you quoted with with --

Then why did he sign a contract to fight that Manny? You know...the one that didn't want to take the drug tests. This is common knowledge by now.

this is what i reply back to you--

how can he sign a contract when they never agreed on the drug test???? lol.......

and that was for zaro, maybe you should GOMD? haha!!!

you came back with this and now the debate has officially started!

Oh, so now you don't want to talk? Make up your mind, bro. I have no problem leaving you be. Being that you just sent me yet another message, I thought I'd jump in.

There are various videos with Floyd claiming that he signed a contract to fight Pac during the first negotiation. One of which he shows that he even had the trunks made. That's how detailed the contract was and all of the p's and q's, i's were dotted, etc.

Of course, you might not believe him, so Yahoo Sports also had an article that they received the contract and they stated how detailed it all was.

So....anything else?

i came back with this --

how do you sign a contract when the drug testing was never agree on.lol.. it was the main reason the fight fell thru. what you mean to say is floyd signed what floyd wanted. so you mean floyd accepted pac's demand for the cut off date? thats why floyd signed the contract right?

and who said i ever wanted to talk to you in the first place? i just quoted you with "thats all you do".. you chose to reply and then tell me to GOMD but then you went and replied to a question being asked for someone else! so GOMD seems appropriate this instance right ?

you replied back with --

1. Why would I think you want to talk to me...when you send me a message? Ok. So you just wanted to alert me to your comment because...? Wanted some attention?

2. Did you listen to where he said he signed the contract?

3.
A contract sent on Dec. 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank on behalf of Pacquiao proposed a 50-50 financial split between the sides for a fight that would have been held March 13, 2010.

The eight-page agreement is so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather).
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing-...010-fight.html

So he was so scared...yet he put his name on a dotted line. It's well known that Manny pulled out due to concerns about drug testing, right?

So who wanted no part of whom?

Your bias is showing. Feel free to go away now.

then i replied with --

i didnt send you any message, i quoted you with "thats all you do".. which pretty much didnt asked for anything in return.


so you just proved what i said that floyd signed what floyed wanted! because pac didnt agree with the drug testing which you just stated yourself! lmao! you really trying to argue about this?

let me ask you this... if floyd had those trunks and outfit made way back then already, why didnt he wore it when they finally fought eachother??? i mean, that would have been the icing on the cake right...

now do you see our conversation here? going back and fourth about a contract that was signed with no agreement.

[travestyny]

blahblahblah

Dude, I'm not reading all of that **** you just posted. You are becoming obsessive. Just stop.

1. I talked to you about Floyd ducking Manny. You refuse to answer if you still feel he was ducking after I mentioned the signed contract and the cut off.

2. Then you turned this around about signing a contract that wasn't agreed on. I just posted to you the quote with Bob Arum saying he received the contract and all terms were agreed on.

Now you have no legs to stand on no matter how you misinterpreted the dialogue. Just shut the **** up about it already. It's over. I could be telling you to "take that L" or whatever other bs you were trying to tell me, but I just want you to GOMD!

[WesternChamp]

"We have a contract that they sent us and all the terms have been agreed to," Arum said.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing-...010-fight.html

You're done. Now tuck your tail and bow out, biotch.

1. Why would I think you want to talk to me...when you send me a message? Ok. So you just wanted to alert me to your comment because...? Wanted some attention?

2. Did you listen to where he said he signed the contract?

3.
A contract sent on Dec. 11, 2009, by Golden Boy Promotions on behalf of Mayweather to Top Rank on behalf of Pacquiao proposed a 50-50 financial split between the sides for a fight that would have been held March 13, 2010.

The eight-page agreement is so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather).
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing-...010-fight.html

So he was so scared...yet he put his name on a dotted line. It's well known that Manny pulled out due to concerns about drug testing, right?

So who wanted no part of whom?

Your bias is showing. Feel free to go away now.

Richard Schaefer, the chief executive officer of Golden Boy Promotions, said he did not recall sending a contract offering a 50-50 split.

Schaefer said he met Arum shortly before Thanksgiving in 2009 to discuss parameters of a deal, but said he didn't remember sending Top Rank a completed contract for signature that included a 50-50 purse split.

lolololololololol

[WesternChamp]

Dude, I'm not reading all of that **** you just posted. You are becoming obsessive. Just stop.

1. I talked to you about Floyd ducking Manny. You refuse to answer if you still feel he was ducking after I mentioned the signed contract and the cut off.

2. Then you turned this around about signing a contract that wasn't agreed on. I just posted to you the quote with Bob Arum saying he received the contract and all terms were agreed on.

Now you have no legs to stand on no matter how you misinterpreted the dialogue. Just shut the **** up about it already. It's over. I could be telling you to "take that L" or whatever other bs you were trying to tell me, but I just want you to GOMD!

you dont wanna read your own post???? lmao!!!!!

[travestyny]

Richard Schaefer, the chief executive officer of Golden Boy Promotions, said he did not recall sending a contract offering a 50-50 split.

Schaefer said he met Arum shortly before Thanksgiving in 2009 to discuss parameters of a deal, but said he didn't remember sending Top Rank a completed contract for signature that included a 50-50 purse split.

lolololololololol

Did you read the part where Yahoo said they received the contract, or not?

However, in a contract obtained by Yahoo! Sports, paragraph 11 under the section entitled Net Profits reads: "Net Profits shall be allocated 50/50 between GBP and TR." The contract goes on to say that net profits would include a split of "all gross revenues."

In sub-paragraph 11 (a), entitled HBO PPV Fight Night Advance, it reads, "Not withstanding the foregoing, the HBO PPV fight night advance shall be paid 50% directly to GBP and 50% directly to TR."

[travestyny]

you dont wanna read your own post???? lmao!!!!!

No, why would I want to read it? Either way you look at it, I already owned your punkass. So just stop with the obsession. It's pathetic.

[WesternChamp]

Dude, I'm not reading all of that **** you just posted. You are becoming obsessive. Just stop.

1. I talked to you about Floyd ducking Manny. You refuse to answer if you still feel he was ducking after I mentioned the signed contract and the cut off.

2. Then you turned this around about signing a contract that wasn't agreed on. I just posted to you the quote with Bob Arum saying he received the contract and all terms were agreed on.

Now you have no legs to stand on no matter how you misinterpreted the dialogue. Just shut the **** up about it already. It's over. I could be telling you to "take that L" or whatever other bs you were trying to tell me, but I just want you to GOMD!

yes, you quoted me and said why did he sign a contract if he didnt want to fight.

you notice how i didnt engage back on anything else you said EXCEPT for "how do you sign a contract that wasnt agree on"

you proceeded to take me up on that and started posting links of the contract golden boy sent to top rank. so what do you call this then? having a debating about a contract that wasnt agree on!

you try to turn this into a who duck who first but i didnt take the bait!

instead i reply back with how do you sign a contract that wasnt agree on and you continue on with this by sending me links of the contract golden boy sent to top rank.