Great objective article by ESPN regarding GGG vs Canelo and why Canelo vacated
Collapse
-
-
Whatever makes you sleep better at night. Same thing would have happened then, he just wouldnt have lost quite as much respect that way. But he still would have had to fight Ggg to fix his respect deficitComment
-
He didn't respond with any numbers what proof is that. I gave you numbers. Now was the split Loeffler negotiated 70-30 yes or no? Or should I write this in Español for youComment
-
The other thing conveniently ignored by Canelo's supporters is that the 15-day "artificial deadline" is not set in stone and if anybody thinks that Sulaiman would not have granted an extension then I have an iceberg to sell them
GBP never wanted this fight in September and nothing that either Oscar (Mr Marinate) and BHop (GGG should move up and fight Kovelev) have said suggests otherwise.
What we are seeing is simply the result of a monumental PR ****up on their behalfComment
-
It's confusing because the old WBC rules are still on line. If you do a search for "WBC title purse split champion vs interim champion" it's the old version of the rules that comes up.
This is a link to the rules they have at their website now. If you check them out, it doesn't say anything about champion vs interim champion any more. It just gives one split after a purse bid: 10% to the winner of the fight and the remaining 90% split 70/30. It also says the WBC can change that split if they want to.
So basically, if Canelo/GGG went to a purse bid, the split would be whatever the WBC decided was fair.Last edited by kafkod; 05-28-2016, 09:15 PM.Comment
-
The other thing conveniently ignored by Canelo's supporters is that the 15-day "artificial deadline" is not set in stone and if anybody thinks that Sulaiman would not have granted an extension then I have an iceberg to sell them
GBP never wanted this fight in September and nothing that either Oscar (Mr Marinate) and BHop (GGG should move up and fight Kovelev) have said suggests otherwise.
What we are seeing is simply the result of a monumental PR ****up on their behalf
You should NEVER call a man's bluff unless you are prepared to deal with the consequences if it turns out that he isn't bluffing after all.Comment
Comment