I didnt really see much else to address besides profanity laden conjecture. But if you want, I'll touch on it. The biggest difference between Golovkin and Canelo is that while wanting a "money" fight with Floyd, Golovkin still fought his mandatory. Canelo, on the other hand, fought a "money" fight then abdicated his responsibility as champion against a challenger he has repeatedly called out. Thats the difference.
Now, back to Lemieux. You claim those 150k ppv buys were for David rather than Gennady. You speculate that GGG wont be on ppv anytime soon. I specualte that Canelo-GGG would have been on ppv. Further, to use your 'litmus test' on Lemieux, why was he relegated to the undercard of an event if he was the main draw? And while I cant speculate on the ppv audience, I can tell you with absolute certainty that almost everyone at the Garden that night was a GGG fan
Now, back to Lemieux. You claim those 150k ppv buys were for David rather than Gennady. You speculate that GGG wont be on ppv anytime soon. I specualte that Canelo-GGG would have been on ppv. Further, to use your 'litmus test' on Lemieux, why was he relegated to the undercard of an event if he was the main draw? And while I cant speculate on the ppv audience, I can tell you with absolute certainty that almost everyone at the Garden that night was a GGG fan
Comment