GGG would crush Lara

[AneesMoha]

I'm talking about GGG, I'm talking about the fans. People are saying that GGG would destroy Lara and I reply with let's see it instead of talking about it.

No point in being against this fight at all. GGG plans to fight two more times this year, at least that's what his team said, so why not let Lara be one of the opponents.
It's going to be so rewarding when GGG beats Lara down.
I don't know why some people are against the match-up. It's a good name to add to GGG's resume.

We will also see if it's just a bluff on Lara's side. I want GGG to call his bluff!

There are people on here that say that is shouldn't be made for reasons like weight class or he would be wrecked (which i do feel) but i have posted that the Lara fight is not worth being stripped of a world title. The WBA will be announcing their mandatory this week and Golovkin will have to fight that mandatory (Jacobs) or Saunders in a unification of be stripped of the WBA title.

[HI-TECH Boxing]

There are people on here that say that is shouldn't be made for reasons like weight class or he would be wrecked (which i do feel) but i have posted that the Lara fight is not worth being stripped of a world title. The WBA will be announcing their mandatory this week and Golovkin will have to fight that mandatory (Jacobs) or Saunders in a unification of be stripped of the WBA title.

Isn't Jacobs fighting in July? I'm sure they'll let GGG have a fight as well before the mandatory. If it isn't Canelo then why not just shut Lara up.
I think GGG wrecks Lara, but it'll be fun seeing Lara down and out after all the trash him, his fans and team have been talking.
If GGG can get Jacobs or Canelo instead, then I say go for it instead of Lara.
I do understand where you're coming from. I agree that Lara is not worth getting stripped, but maybe something could be done about it. Maybe WBA will allow GGG and Jacobs to have one more interim fight. Jacobs hasn't fought since December; I don't think he'll be too interested to fight GGG in his first fight of the year.

Why would he be stripped if he doesn't fight Saunders?

[AneesMoha]

Isn't Jacobs fighting in July? I'm sure they'll let GGG have a fight as well before the mandatory. If it isn't Canelo then why not just shut Lara up.
I think GGG wrecks Lara, but it'll be fun seeing Lara down and out after all the trash him, his fans and team have been talking.
If GGG can get Jacobs or Canelo instead, then I say go for it instead of Lara.
I do understand where you're coming from. I agree that Lara is not worth getting stripped, but maybe something could be done about it. Maybe WBA will allow GGG and Jacobs to have one more interim fight. Jacobs hasn't fought since December; I don't think he'll be too interested to fight GGG in his first fight of the year.

Why would he be stripped if he doesn't fight Saunders?

If they announce Jacobs as a mandatory the only other fight Golovkin is supposed to be able to take is a unification fight, in this case it would be Saunders.

[Graz]

Isn't Jacobs fighting in July? I'm sure they'll let GGG have a fight as well before the mandatory. If it isn't Canelo then why not just shut Lara up.
I think GGG wrecks Lara, but it'll be fun seeing Lara down and out after all the trash him, his fans and team have been talking.
If GGG can get Jacobs or Canelo instead, then I say go for it instead of Lara.
I do understand where you're coming from. I agree that Lara is not worth getting stripped, but maybe something could be done about it. Maybe WBA will allow GGG and Jacobs to have one more interim fight. Jacobs hasn't fought since December; I don't think he'll be too interested to fight GGG in his first fight of the year.

Why would he be stripped if he doesn't fight Saunders?

GGG has no interest in Lara because quite frankly it wouldn't be much of a challenge for him. He's already been criticized for "not fighting anybody" here on this forum. Lara would be another one added to that list. It really wouldn't be a fair fight. I personally would like to see it because Lara has some boxing skills. I don't think Lara's hit and run tactics would work in this case but it would be entertaining to watch.

[HI-TECH Boxing]

If they announce Jacobs as a mandatory the only other fight Golovkin is supposed to be able to take is a unification fight, in this case it would be Saunders.

Jacobs is fighting in July though, so I think it is possible that the WBA allows GGG to also have an interim bout, without it having to be a unification fight, before they finally meet later this year. GGG is not going to want to sit out until the end of the year. His team already said they want to fight in September then December. So Jacobs fights on July 30 and GGG fights in early September, that would be a little over a month apart, then they face off in December.
I guess we would have to get more details to see what is going to happen.

GGG has no interest in Lara because quite frankly it wouldn't be much of a challenge for him. He's already been criticized for "not fighting anybody" here on this forum. Lara would be another one added to that list. It really wouldn't be a fair fight. I personally would like to see it because Lara has some boxing skills. I don't think Lara's hit and run tactics would work in this case but it would be entertaining to watch.

GGG likes to stay active. There is only so many fighters he could fight.
Maybe Lara will be a challenge or maybe he won't. I don't want to talk about it, I actually want to see it be done.
Once GGG whoops Lara it will be fun to see what those detractors have to say.
It is true that some people will never give GGG credit no matter what he does, but it will be satisfying for his fans to see GGG beat the guy he was "ducking."

[AneesMoha]

Jacobs is fighting in July though, so I think it is possible that the WBA allows GGG to also have an interim bout, without it having to be a unification fight, before they finally meet later this year. GGG is not going to want to sit out until the end of the year. His team already said they want to fight in September then December. So Jacobs fights on July 30 and GGG fights in early September, that would be a little over a month apart, then they face off in December.
I guess we would have to get more details to see what is going to happen.



GGG likes to stay active. There is only so many fighters he could fight.
Maybe Lara will be a challenge or maybe he won't. I don't want to talk about it, I actually want to see it be done.
Once GGG whoops Lara it will be fun to see what those detractors have to say.
It is true that some people will never give GGG credit no matter what he does, but it will be satisfying for his fans to see GGG beat the guy he was "ducking."

I'm sure that they could work something out. WBA still hasnt announced and last week they said the would by today so there goes that.

As for Lara beating Golovkin I get it you guys are fans but what weapons does Lara honestly have in his arsenal to beat Golovkin honestly? On paper it is a huge mismatch besides Lara's 5 inch reach advantage.

[HI-TECH Boxing]

I'm sure that they could work something out. WBA still hasnt announced and last week they said the would by today so there goes that.

As for Lara beating Golovkin I get it you guys are fans but what weapons does Lara honestly have in his arsenal to beat Golovkin honestly? On paper it is a huge mismatch besides Lara's 5 inch reach advantage.

I'm a GGG fan, although it's getting harder and harder to support him, where did I write that Lara beats GGG?
I think GGG whoops him, but I don't want to talk about it, I want to see it be done. Maybe it's going to be a huge mismatch or maybe it won't. Why not find out?
Beating Lara would do GGG more good than bad. I just don't understand why some people are so against it. Do you want people to keep saying GGG is ducking Lara? GGG will more than likely beat Lara, but let's see it so we can get rid-off this annoyance. Wouldn't you want that?

[AneesMoha]

I'm a GGG fan, although it's getting harder and harder to support him, where did I write that Lara beats GGG?
I think GGG whoops him, but I don't want to talk about it, I want to see it be done. Maybe it's going to be a huge mismatch or maybe it won't. Why not find out?
Beating Lara would do GGG more good than bad. I just don't understand why some people are so against it. Do you want people to keep saying GGG is ducking Lara? GGG will more than likely beat Lara, but let's see it so we can get rid-off this annoyance. Wouldn't you want that?

I wasn't talking about you specifically man. I was talking about those pushing for the fight stating that Lara beats Golovkin because of technique, his jab, movement. What I am saying is that Lara doesn't have the weapons to beat Golovkin at all.

[New England]

yes, he'd likely blast lara. i still wouldn't mind the fight. i'd even buy it on PPV.

better than free willy junior

[jqSide]

GGG would crush Lara.

I still want to see the fight. Make it happen.