Originally posted by HI-TECH Boxing
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GGG would crush Lara
Collapse
-
Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View PostLara was only 160 tonight, Vanes was 170.
The speed difference would be interesting to see, but the size difference would be just as big. Still a much better opponent than Monroe or Wade.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostCause he would go 12 and no clear winner. That's really what his fans are afraid of, not really that GGG would destroy him in 1 round or whatever bull**** they're going around saying. It's that it would disrupt the KO streak
Comment
-
Originally posted by AneesMoha View PostGGG isn't talking about it. Lara and his fans are the only ones talking about it. Golovkin has never spoken of Lara (Golovkin himself I'm not talking about his team).
No point in being against this fight at all. GGG plans to fight two more times this year, at least that's what his team said, so why not let Lara be one of the opponents.
It's going to be so rewarding when GGG beats Lara down.
I don't know why some people are against the match-up. It's a good name to add to GGG's resume.
We will also see if it's just a bluff on Lara's side. I want GGG to call his bluff!Last edited by HI-TECH Boxing; 05-22-2016, 06:22 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ИATAS View PostI was hoping he would look really impressive tonight and make a good case for himself but sadly he didn't he just reminded everyone that he doesn't belong at 160 especially against Golovkin. Definitely prefer Saunders Jacobs or Eubank but if not them, sure go for Lara but don't be a hypocrite after Lara is in the hospital.
+11111111
Comment
-
Originally posted by HI-TECH Boxing View PostI'm talking about GGG, I'm talking about the fans. People are saying that GGG would destroy Lara and I reply with let's see it instead of talking about it.
No point in being against this fight at all. GGG plans to fight two more times this year, at least that's what his team said, so why not let Lara be one of the opponents.
It's going to be so rewarding when GGG beats Lara down.
I don't know why some people are against the match-up. It's a good name to add to GGG's resume.
We will also see if it's just a bluff on Lara's side. I want GGG to call his bluff!
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeonSpinxMwfpce View PostWhats so good about a guy that struggles with vanes, molina and angulo? Enlighten me.
Jacobs will fight in July. He won't be available for those dates. Saunders? I seriously doubt Saunders would want to fight GGG in his first fight of the year. He hasn't fought since December and has no fight scheduled.
Canelo? Well, we will have to see if Canelo wants it.
SO PLEASE! WHY DON'T YOU ENLIGHTEN ME. WHO ELSE DOES GGG FIGHT?
You're the type of fan that makes and keeps making GGG look bad. I actually believe in GGG and I want him to end Lara. Why is that so bad?
Only good things will come from GGG beating Lara down. Why are some of you people against it? It's not like GGG has a huge list of fighters he can fight and GGG wants to stay active anyway, so why not have one of those fights be against Lara.
Either Lara accepts the fight and GGG beats his ass or GGG calls Lara's bluff. Nothing but good things for GGG come from that.
If GGG's team can negotiate a fight with Lara's people then I say try to make it. That would shut a lot of people up.
If he can't get Canelo next then I say GGG offer Lara a fight. That's not bad, now is it?
Lets see if Lara is serious or not!
September: GGG fights Lara if NO Canelo.
December: GGG fights again.
GGG wants to keep active.
Comment
Comment