Danny Jacobs goes into hiding

[Scipio2009]

If that is what it sounds like, than why wouldnt I just put in a regular bet?
I dont think I should have to put that much more money than you.
I do old-school bets, same amount.
I wouldn't even consider that regularly due to the types of odds these fights have.
Lots of guys are known for not paying on here too.

Weren't you the one trying to state that Jacobs didn't have a chance in hell? lol

Even if the odds end up being 20:1, if you're a person who actually stands by your words, you wouldn't sweat the odds and just expect to make your $100.

I've never backed out on a bet that was agreed to in my life, and I don't plan on doing that now.

After dogging out Jacobs the way you've done, falling back to "I only do old-school bets" is a bit rich.

[Herr Schmeling]

Please name one instance where the Sauerland's, upon winning a purse bid, shorted their fighter on their share of the contracted bid.

LOL. Happens all the time. Not only with Sauerland. It's a pretty common practice. Only because you have no idea how things work, if doesn't mean it's not like that. Most recent example is Abraham vs. Ramirez. Google the purses, ******.

[Chollo Vista]

Weren't you the one trying to state that Jacobs didn't have a chance in hell? lol

Even if the odds end up being 20:1, if you're a person who actually stands by your words, you wouldn't sweat the odds and just expect to make your $100.

I've never backed out on a bet that was agreed to in my life, and I don't plan on doing that now.

After dogging out Jacobs the way you've done, falling back to "I only do old-school bets" is a bit rich.

He accuses you of not accepting the bet, then he turns around and doesn't accept the bet.

[SweetPbfAli]

Dude legit beat cancer. Doubt he's afraid of another fighter. Just my perspective.

[_Maxi]

That's how it should be, those are the best MWs and they should all fight each other atleast once. If we don't get all or most of those fights, then boxing is a bigger joke than I think it is...

Also, you can throw Lee somewhere in the mix, he's quote the spoiler. And Korobov

I agree too. Everyone wants to see that. But I doub't they'll through Canelo into that mix at 160.

[Scipio2009]

LOL. Happens all the time. Not only with Sauerland. It's a pretty common practice. Only because you have no idea how things work, if doesn't mean it's not like that. Most recent example is Abraham vs. Ramirez. Google the purses, ******.

yet you still have yet to name an instance where the Sauerlands, or any promoter for that matter, has signed on for a contracted bid, shorted the bid, yet still were allowed to put on the fight.

Sauerlands won the purse bid for just north of $1.5m ($1125000/$375000), and Top Rank, almost immediately, made a deal with the Sauerlands to put that fight on the Pacquiao-Bradley III undercard (with Top Rank likely giving up some money and the Germany TV rights to the fight to the Sauerlands). Beyond that, purse numbers aren't ever complete.

Abraham: $500k + a share of the German TV rights for Pacquiao-Bradley III
Ramirez: $140k + a share of the TV Azteca money for Pacquiao-Bradley III

you played yourself.

[Herr Schmeling]

yet you still have yet to name an instance where the Sauerlands, or any promoter for that matter, has signed on for a contracted bid, shorted the bid, yet still were allowed to put on the fight.

Sauerlands won the purse bid for just north of $1.5m ($1125000/$375000), and Top Rank, almost immediately, made a deal with the Sauerlands to put that fight on the Pacquiao-Bradley III undercard (with Top Rank likely giving up some money and the Germany TV rights to the fight to the Sauerlands). Beyond that, purse numbers aren't ever complete.

Abraham: $500k + a share of the German TV rights for Pacquiao-Bradley III
Ramirez: $140k + a share of the TV Azteca money for Pacquiao-Bradley III

you played yourself.

Haha. What German TV money you're talking about? The card was streamed by a small online platform for 19,99 Euro, since German people don't get up for boxing at 4 am. Lol.

As I said, it's common practice. I don't care if u acknowledge it or not. If u prefer to live with your ******ity, it's your choice. But please stop talking about things u have no clue off.

[Scipio2009]

Haha. What German TV money you're talking about? The card was streamed by a small online platform for 19,99 Euro, since German people don't get up for boxing at 4 am. Lol.

As I said, it's common practice. I don't care if u acknowledge it or not. If u prefer to live with your ******ity, it's your choice. But please stop talking about things u have no clue off.

Abraham and Leon Bauer, both Saureland-promoted fighters, were on the bill and I doubt that the "small online platform" selling the fight for 20 Euros was a pirated operation.

Sauerlands won the bid for the fight (~$1.55m; $1,125,000 to Abraham/$375k to Ramirez), and swapped that won bid for a disclosed $500k to Abraham and the rights to Pacquiao-Bradley III in Germany (at 20 Euros a stream, 30k streams breaks even on the amount owed on the bid; wouldn't be shocked if the Sauerland's opted to sell the rights to the streaming outfit, rather than worry about carrying the risk on their own).

If Abraham is anywhere near as big a star as folks thin he is locally with Pacquiao allegedly being a global star, the fact that you can't even fathom the German broadcasting rights to the Pacquiao-Bradley III card even being worth $600k is laughable.

[glenn mcrory]

Weren't you the one trying to state that Jacobs didn't have a chance in hell? lol

Even if the odds end up being 20:1, if you're a person who actually stands by your words, you wouldn't sweat the odds and just expect to make your $100.

I've never backed out on a bet that was agreed to in my life, and I don't plan on doing that now.

After dogging out Jacobs the way you've done, falling back to "I only do old-school bets" is a bit rich.

I am not going to put 2000-4000 dollars on a ****ing bet to win 100 dollars.
You have 100 to lose. Real big man right there.
I only put down $100 on Salido-Lomachenko, a fight I was sure Salido would win and did.
I don't have that kind of money to put down on a bet. It's not even that I think I'll lose it, its that I don't have that kind of money to use for something like that. Most people don't.

[Scipio2009]

I am not going to put 2000-4000 dollars on a ****ing bet to win 100 dollars.
You have 100 to lose. Real big man right there.
I only put down $100 on Salido-Lomachenko, a fight I was sure Salido would win and did.
I don't have that kind of money to put down on a bet. It's not even that I think I'll lose it, its that I don't have that kind of money to use for something like that. Most people don't.

lol

Salido was brought in as the rugged guy to help Lomachenko set the record for fastest path to a world title and you were willing to put your money on that, yet you're spooked of laying down money on Golovkin on a fight like Golovkin-Monroe or on Garcia for a fight like Garcia-Salka?

gtfoh

Lomachenko was a 6:1 favorite for that ****ing fight, and you bet the underdog? you played yourself.